AIRLINK 177.92 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (0.52%)
BOP 12.88 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.55%)
CNERGY 7.58 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.2%)
FCCL 45.99 Increased By ▲ 3.97 (9.45%)
FFL 15.16 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (2.16%)
FLYNG 27.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.3%)
HUBC 132.04 Decreased By ▼ -2.47 (-1.84%)
HUMNL 13.29 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (2.55%)
KEL 4.46 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.45%)
KOSM 6.06 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 56.63 Increased By ▲ 2.12 (3.89%)
OGDC 223.84 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (0.57%)
PACE 5.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.66%)
PAEL 41.51 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.51%)
PIAHCLA 16.01 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (2.5%)
PIBTL 9.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.79%)
POWER 11.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.09%)
PPL 186.63 Increased By ▲ 2.64 (1.43%)
PRL 34.90 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (1.72%)
PTC 23.53 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.81%)
SEARL 94.96 Increased By ▲ 3.89 (4.27%)
SILK 1.14 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.7%)
SSGC 35.50 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (4.47%)
SYM 15.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-2.01%)
TELE 7.87 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.13%)
TPLP 10.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.73%)
TRG 59.20 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (0.82%)
WAVESAPP 10.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.09%)
WTL 1.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.74%)
YOUW 3.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.26%)
AIRLINK 177.92 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (0.52%)
BOP 12.88 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.55%)
CNERGY 7.58 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.2%)
FCCL 45.99 Increased By ▲ 3.97 (9.45%)
FFL 15.16 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (2.16%)
FLYNG 27.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.3%)
HUBC 132.04 Decreased By ▼ -2.47 (-1.84%)
HUMNL 13.29 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (2.55%)
KEL 4.46 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.45%)
KOSM 6.06 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 56.63 Increased By ▲ 2.12 (3.89%)
OGDC 223.84 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (0.57%)
PACE 5.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.66%)
PAEL 41.51 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.51%)
PIAHCLA 16.01 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (2.5%)
PIBTL 9.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.79%)
POWER 11.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.09%)
PPL 186.63 Increased By ▲ 2.64 (1.43%)
PRL 34.90 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (1.72%)
PTC 23.53 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.81%)
SEARL 94.96 Increased By ▲ 3.89 (4.27%)
SILK 1.14 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.7%)
SSGC 35.50 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (4.47%)
SYM 15.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-2.01%)
TELE 7.87 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.13%)
TPLP 10.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.73%)
TRG 59.20 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (0.82%)
WAVESAPP 10.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.09%)
WTL 1.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.74%)
YOUW 3.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.26%)
BR100 12,130 Increased By 107.3 (0.89%)
BR30 37,246 Increased By 640.2 (1.75%)
KSE100 114,399 Increased By 685.5 (0.6%)
KSE30 35,458 Increased By 156.2 (0.44%)

EDITORIAL: About time Pakistan took its TTP (Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan)-specific concerns to the Security Council. The country’s ambassador to the UN, Munir Akram, has formally told the council that Islamabad has “clear evidence” that the outlawed terrorist group is supported by “our main adversary” and is allowed to conduct cross-border attacks at will.

He didn’t have to spell it out, but it was clear that he was alluding to the Indian government and its intelligence agencies’ financial and material support to TTP to attack security installations and personnel inside Pakistan in what is effectively its second insurgency against this state.

It’s a shame that the Afghan government did not keep its word about dismantling the TTP network on its side of the border. That was, after all, the quid pro quo for our help in bringing about the Doha negotiations that saw the end of the so-called war on terror and departure of all occupying troops from Afghanistan after more than two decades of constant fighting.

And now, after delivering a clear warning about “decisive action” to Kabul, taking the UN on board is part of a clear pattern that will, most probably, see Pakistan put its foot down and do whatever needs to be done to crush TTP once and for all; wherever it is holed up.

The Indian influence is not new. New Delhi worked closely with the Karzai and Ghani administrations, openly shared their anti-Pakistan obsession, and kept TTP fed and armed immediately after the Pakistani military smashed its command structure in the tribal area and forced its remaining fighters to flee across the Durand Line.

But the expectation that this influence – a clear violation of international law – would come to an end with the return of the Taliban proved completely wrong. And Pakistan not only faces a new, bloody insurgency but, quite rightly, also feels betrayed by the Afghan government.

No doubt this issue would have been touched upon during the army chief’s visit to the US as well. For, there is concern everywhere that TTP has got its hands on high-tech equipment left behind by American forces as they scrambled to leave the war-torn country. And that equipment, which includes night vision goggles and sophisticated sniper rifles, is being employed against the Pakistani military and police forces.

The Americans do not publicly admit to any unaccounted for hardware, blaming the former Afghan army instead, which melted away as soon as Ashraf Ghani fled the country, but the facts must have come out in military-to-military interactions between Pakistan and the US.

It’s significant that the head of the UN mission in Afghanistan has also endorsed Islamabad’s complaints, especially that “Afghan de facto authorities have done little to contain the TTP”. With complete international isolation looming – which is exactly what will happen once Islamabad turns its back on them – the Taliban may well regret their lack of wisdom in breaking their promise to Pakistan for the sake of TTP terrorists.

In fact, Pakistani authorities should have sniffed their insincerity when they first tried to delay action instead of taking their smart idea of talking to TTP. Even now, with attacks once again becoming a daily occurrence, there is a need for greater urgency in Pakistan’s response.

The future is uncertain, because the Taliban will not react well to any cross-border action. But that should not stop the military from taking all necessary action to exterminate TTP once and for all.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.

KU Dec 26, 2023 10:45am
The future is very certain if we chicken out on our right to defend the people and country. Our propaganda gurus mention only 80k martyred civilians and soldiers in terrorism, it's actually 100k, and keeps going on. Knowing international geopolitical odds against us, we should find some courage and speak the language best understood by enemies.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
TimetoMoVVeOn Dec 27, 2023 06:18am
So if the indian influence is so clear then why not say India at the UN. It is getting boring now to keep blaming India for your security failures. The giani govt is no longer in afgan it is your friends taliban that is in power. But keep blaming India for everything. Pathetic.
thumb_up Recommended (0)