AGL 38.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 213.91 Increased By ▲ 3.53 (1.68%)
BOP 9.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.63%)
CNERGY 6.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-2.93%)
DCL 8.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-2.12%)
DFML 42.21 Increased By ▲ 3.84 (10.01%)
DGKC 94.12 Decreased By ▼ -2.80 (-2.89%)
FCCL 35.19 Decreased By ▼ -1.21 (-3.32%)
FFBL 88.94 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 16.39 Increased By ▲ 1.44 (9.63%)
HUBC 126.90 Decreased By ▼ -3.79 (-2.9%)
HUMNL 13.37 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.6%)
KEL 5.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-3.45%)
KOSM 6.94 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.14%)
MLCF 42.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.80 (-4.02%)
NBP 58.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.37%)
OGDC 219.42 Decreased By ▼ -10.71 (-4.65%)
PAEL 39.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.33%)
PIBTL 8.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.56%)
PPL 191.66 Decreased By ▼ -8.69 (-4.34%)
PRL 37.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.96 (-2.47%)
PTC 26.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-2.01%)
SEARL 104.00 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.36%)
TELE 8.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.71%)
TOMCL 34.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-1.42%)
TPLP 12.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.64 (-4.73%)
TREET 25.34 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.32%)
TRG 70.45 Increased By ▲ 6.33 (9.87%)
UNITY 33.39 Decreased By ▼ -1.13 (-3.27%)
WTL 1.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-3.37%)
BR100 11,881 Decreased By -216 (-1.79%)
BR30 36,807 Decreased By -908.3 (-2.41%)
KSE100 110,423 Decreased By -1991.5 (-1.77%)
KSE30 34,778 Decreased By -730.1 (-2.06%)

For what it’s worth, Fazlur Rahman’s trip to Kabul has left me five hundred rupees richer. I bet with a journalist friend that the maulana would be received with the pomp and show of an official visit – which is what it was, after all – that the Taliban would assure him that Afghan soil was not and shall never be used for attacks on Pakistan, and that that would be the end of the matter. There would be no surprises, and certainly no breakthrough.

Hence the quick 500. Thank you very much.

I was surprised, though, that the prime minister of the “emirate”, Mullah Hassan Akhund, asked Islamabad to end its “cruel attitude” towards Afghan refugees. That’s rich. Because most of the Afghans here who’ve been asked to return to their country – except the ones on missions to run sleeper cells and carry out suicide attacks, etc. – were only here because of the Taliban’s own very cruel attitude towards them, their religions and sects, their liberal beliefs, especially their desire for a normal, progressive life.

If the Taliban were never too concerned about those refugees when they lived inside Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, why are they so worried about how they’re treated in Pakistan? Especially since most of them fled Afghanistan, for their lives, to take refuge in Pakistan. If it was meant to dilute the delegation’s one-point agenda – of discussing what needs to be done about TTP – then it worked. For, unable to overcome his penchant for dissing Islamabad whenever and wherever possible, the maulana promptly enlightened his hosts, reportedly, about how JUI-F “opposed the treatment meted out to the Afghan refugees in Pakistan and asserted that such an attitude was the root cause of the problems between the two sides”, according to the front-page lead of a major English daily.

Root cause? The refugees, not TTP? From what little reached the press, they must have talked about this a lot; at least more than they talked about TTP. Because the statement out of Kabul after the talks “did not make any reference to this contentious issue and only obliquely referred to the oft-repeated statement of the Taliban regime that it would not allow anybody to use the Afghan soil against any country”, the same report added.

So the maulana returned just as empty handed as he left. That’s not surprising. What is shocking, however, is that the Pakistani establishment is still groping in the dark about dealing with the TTP threat. Nobody believes that the maulana went on a private visit. And the most the media is saying is that he led a nine-member delegation, with at least one editorial in a reliable newspaper confirming that “Pakistan’s top diplomat in Kabul [was] with him during his engagements, indicating that the JUI-F chief’s visit had official sanction”.

What now? Reminding the Taliban of their promise in Doha didn’t help. Taking their advice and negotiating directly with TTP – for which plan- and bus-loads of clerics belonging to only one sectarian denomination were taken to Kabul to negotiate on behalf of the entire state of Pakistan and all its people with terrorists that have already claimed 90,000 innocent lives – didn’t help either. Then the threat of “decisive action” was laughed away by Kabul and also didn’t help at all. Now the maulana was shuttled to Afghanistan, most probably to leverage his connections with some Taliban officials that go back to their student days in Pakistani seminaries, and that too did not help.

Meantime, TTP’s insurgency is gaining momentum and Pakistanis, especially security forces, are falling to their bombs and bullets just like all those years ago when their attack, amid all the noise of the war on terror, caught the country off guard. This time, though, it was as predictable as the maulana’s failure as assured. And now it’s certain that the Taliban are not going to shut down TTP inside Afghanistan. And that TTP will continue with its attacks.

But it’s shameful that Pakistan’s response has become equally predictable. We go round the same circle after each attack – remind the Taliban of their pledge, then take their word that Afghan soil was not used and wait for the next TTP attack, which is often bolder and kills more people than the previous one.

One would have thought that the lowest point was when the PTI government green-lighted repatriation of TTP fighters into the tribal area, insulting thousands upon thousands of Pakistanis who had put loved ones in early graves only because the state could not protect them. Yet it keeps getting worse.

Now they’ve even played the maulana card, and failed once again. But will this make them realise that they are only doing favours to people who’re betting against them opening their eyes anytime soon?

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Shahab Jafry

The writer can be reached at [email protected]

Comments

Comments are closed.

KU Jan 11, 2024 11:40am
Maulana is well known for his abilities to huff and puff, but only in Pakistan. What needs to be answered is the curious or mysterious source of financing the TTP, not only weapons but the wages given to its members and mercenaries. And then the question begs purpose or ideology behind TTPs terrorism, its obviously not religion nor is it US nor is it border dispute. The answer perhaps lies in geo-politics and increase in pressure on our government to unfriend our relations with China and walk according to the length of the leash. We have no option but to respond and respond with finality, or if the will is waning, hand the response to local tribes and declare open-season to start an end to this problem.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
TimetoMoVVeOn Jan 11, 2024 01:35pm
@KU, My feeling is that TTP is a way for the Afgan Taliban to have strategic depth into Pakistan. The Afgan Taliban do not recognize the Durand line that separates Pak from Afganistan and divides the Pashtoons. TTP helps with the cause. You cannot rule out financing from India towards the TTP to counterbalance any infiltration from Pak to Kashmir.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Sohail Jan 11, 2024 09:56pm
@KU, your question is an apt one and the answer is in plain sight. TTP gets most of its sourcing from kidnapping people in Pakistan especially Karachi and bhatta from businesses in FATA and Karachi. About the weaponry, it comes from the money and purchased in Afghanistan. Why Taliban support TTP? Well, the answer is again plain and simple. Taliban factions support TTP because they are political entity and their influence and fear is real in Taliban. So Taliban cannot take action against them and it is matter if convenience for them to allow TTP to operate with impunity.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Jan 11, 2024 11:43pm
Everyone wants someone to deliver results in one go. Why can't it be a collective effort, with everyone, pitching in. As the saying goes, you fail, if you don't even try.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Jan 11, 2024 11:47pm
One meeting and the problem is solved. Most often, things are not so easy. Even for the US, it took a lot of meetings and negotiations, before the exit.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Jan 12, 2024 12:26am
Most everyone, everywhere, wants someone to deliver it, for them. Trying will not be enough. Results should be delivered, while they are busy with their everyday life.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Jan 12, 2024 12:28am
Did the guy offer his services for a fee, with money back guarantee. If so, then he should return the money.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Jan 12, 2024 12:28am
Did the guy offer his services for a fee, with money back guarantee. If so, then he should return the money.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Jan 12, 2024 12:31am
At least he tried. And there is a saying, you only fail, if you didn't try.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Jan 12, 2024 12:32am
If someone tries and fails, you can laugh at him, or you can laud him for trying.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Jan 12, 2024 05:48pm
If someone is trying to stop against his countrymen, everyone should pray and hope that they succeed, not bet against him succeeding. It is a shameful act, that one would bet that he is going to fail. And if someone fails in their efforts, it is a sad thing, as more people would end up as victims. You don't gloat about it in a news article. Very shameful.
thumb_up Recommended (0)