AGL 40.22 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.52%)
AIRLINK 127.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.99 (-0.77%)
BOP 6.61 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.15%)
CNERGY 4.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-2.17%)
DCL 8.63 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.77%)
DFML 41.65 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.41%)
DGKC 87.00 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (0.49%)
FCCL 32.40 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.81%)
FFBL 65.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.03%)
FFL 10.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.2%)
HUBC 109.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.89 (-0.81%)
HUMNL 14.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.02%)
KEL 5.13 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 7.60 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (6.74%)
MLCF 41.65 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
NBP 59.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-0.82%)
OGDC 194.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-0.15%)
PAEL 28.20 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.89%)
PIBTL 7.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.5%)
PPL 152.40 Increased By ▲ 1.23 (0.81%)
PRL 26.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.15%)
PTC 16.03 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.19%)
SEARL 81.61 Increased By ▲ 3.41 (4.36%)
TELE 7.47 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.08%)
TOMCL 35.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.7%)
TPLP 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (4.3%)
TREET 16.10 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (1.32%)
TRG 52.92 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.3%)
UNITY 26.80 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.94%)
WTL 1.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.79%)
BR100 9,910 Decreased By -10.5 (-0.11%)
BR30 30,787 Increased By 35.1 (0.11%)
KSE100 93,458 Increased By 233.4 (0.25%)
KSE30 28,963 Increased By 78.1 (0.27%)

ISLAMABAD: President Dr Arif Alvi has directed Islamabad Electric Supply Company (IESCO) to refund Rs139,860 to Haji Akhtar Raheem (the complainant) who had been wrongly issued an additional demand notice for the installation of an electricity connection along with a transformer due to cost escalation.

“IESCO had violated its own procedure by not installing the connection within 30 days and later sent an additional demand notice to the complainant, who had already paid the original requisite amount, on account of the escalation of the cost of the material,” the president issued these directions while deciding upon a representation filed by IESCO assailing the order of the Wafaqi Mohtasib directing IESCO to refund the amount to the complainant and adopt proper procedure/rules/regulation, which were violated by IESCO, resulting in maladministration.

Haji Akhtar Rahim (the complainant) had applied with IESCO for an electricity connection along with a 25 KVA transformer. Subsequently, a demand notice of Rs305,656, including the cost of allied material was issued to him. He deposited the amount, however, IESCO instead of installing his connection timely, issued an additional demand notice of Rs139,860 on account of the escalation of the cost of the material.

He approached IESCO for withdrawal of the demand notice but to no avail. Feeling aggrieved, he approached the Wafaqi Mohtasib for the redressal of his grievance, who passed the order in his favour. IESCO, then, filed a representation against the order of the Mohtasib with the president.

After personally hearing the case and going through the record of the case, the president directed IESCO to refund the amount to the complainant. He referred to IESCO’s Consumer Service Manual which provided that once the demand notice had been issued by IESCO and paid by the applicant in full, no further charges/demand notice could be raised on account of the escalation of the cost of the material. He further noted that as per the Manual, IESCO was bound to install the connection within 30 days but it delayed the installation by seven months.

The president concluded that Wafaqi Mohtasib’s decision was based on sound reasoning and was sustainable in the eyes of the law. He, therefore, rejected the IESCO’s representation and upheld the Mohtasib’s decision.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.