AGL 40.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.4%)
AIRLINK 129.53 Decreased By ▼ -2.20 (-1.67%)
BOP 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
CNERGY 4.63 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.58%)
DCL 8.94 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.36%)
DFML 41.69 Increased By ▲ 1.08 (2.66%)
DGKC 83.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.37%)
FCCL 32.77 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.33%)
FFBL 75.47 Increased By ▲ 6.86 (10%)
FFL 11.47 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.06%)
HUBC 110.55 Decreased By ▼ -1.21 (-1.08%)
HUMNL 14.56 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.75%)
KEL 5.39 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.26%)
KOSM 8.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-6.46%)
MLCF 39.79 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.91%)
NBP 60.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
OGDC 199.66 Increased By ▲ 4.72 (2.42%)
PAEL 26.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.15%)
PIBTL 7.66 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.41%)
PPL 157.92 Increased By ▲ 2.15 (1.38%)
PRL 26.73 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
PTC 18.46 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.87%)
SEARL 82.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-0.7%)
TELE 8.31 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 34.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.12%)
TPLP 9.06 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.84%)
TREET 17.47 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (4.61%)
TRG 61.32 Decreased By ▼ -1.13 (-1.81%)
UNITY 27.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.04%)
WTL 1.38 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (7.81%)
BR100 10,407 Increased By 220 (2.16%)
BR30 31,713 Increased By 377.1 (1.2%)
KSE100 97,328 Increased By 1781.9 (1.86%)
KSE30 30,192 Increased By 614.4 (2.08%)

LAHORE: Customs authorities are blamed for imposing duties and taxes on the goods in transit found in access of the quantities declared at the port of entry, said sources.

According to details, an importer had availed the transit facility under Pak-Afghan Transit Trade Agreement, 2010. Upon arrival at the Customs port, they were transported to the exit port through the licensed carriers after completion of the formalities prescribed in connection with the transit facility.

However, the customs officials examined the goods at the intermediary post and found the consignments in access of the quantities declared at the port of entry.

Consequently, a show-cause notice was served upon the importer and his clearing agent while confiscating the access quantities making it clear that redemption can only be possible subject to payment of fine.

However, the importer contested his case on the point that it was not the case of the department that the consignments were not transported in violation of the rules nor that the seals had been tampered with. The department had also not disputed that goods transported are not subject to levy or charge of customs duty and other taxes.

The importer further maintained in the case of transit, the territory of Pakistan is used solely for the purpose of transmitting goods and their import into Afghanistan, pursuant to the agreement between the two countries.

He further stressed that the department can levy and charge duty or taxes in case the transit goods are subject to unauthorized unloading from a licensed bonded carrier, or even such an attempt is made, or the transit rules are materially breached.

In the absence of such acts, he stressed, the goods in transit could not be subject to payment of duties and taxes. According to him, a show-cause notice was issued to him without proving that any attempt was made to pilfer the goods in transit for a purpose other than transit to Afghanistan. The appellate forums had no option but to side with the importer.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.