AGL 40.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.4%)
AIRLINK 129.53 Decreased By ▼ -2.20 (-1.67%)
BOP 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
CNERGY 4.63 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.58%)
DCL 8.94 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.36%)
DFML 41.69 Increased By ▲ 1.08 (2.66%)
DGKC 83.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.37%)
FCCL 32.77 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.33%)
FFBL 75.47 Increased By ▲ 6.86 (10%)
FFL 11.47 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.06%)
HUBC 110.55 Decreased By ▼ -1.21 (-1.08%)
HUMNL 14.56 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.75%)
KEL 5.39 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.26%)
KOSM 8.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-6.46%)
MLCF 39.79 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.91%)
NBP 60.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
OGDC 199.66 Increased By ▲ 4.72 (2.42%)
PAEL 26.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.15%)
PIBTL 7.66 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.41%)
PPL 157.92 Increased By ▲ 2.15 (1.38%)
PRL 26.73 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
PTC 18.46 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.87%)
SEARL 82.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-0.7%)
TELE 8.31 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 34.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.12%)
TPLP 9.06 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.84%)
TREET 17.47 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (4.61%)
TRG 61.32 Decreased By ▼ -1.13 (-1.81%)
UNITY 27.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.04%)
WTL 1.38 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (7.81%)
BR100 10,407 Increased By 220 (2.16%)
BR30 31,713 Increased By 377.1 (1.2%)
KSE100 97,328 Increased By 1781.9 (1.86%)
KSE30 30,192 Increased By 614.4 (2.08%)

LAHORE: Faulty FIRs against hundi/hawala operators fail to prove illegal activity in courts, said sources.

In most of the cases, they said the prosecution fails to establish that the information obtained from the laptops are sufficient to prove that certain amounts against the names of individuals are proceeds of hundi/hawala.

Generally, the FIA officials carry out raids upon receiving inside information that a particular shop of money exchange is dealing in the unlawful business of hundi/hawala. These raids are considered to be successful on account of the arrest of shop managers as well as recovery of heavy cash amounts, mobile phones, cheque books and laptops.

Interestingly, the shop managers also admit before the raiding team about their dealings in the illegal business of hundi/hawala, known as incriminating articles in support of canvassed allegations. Since some of these articles are found missing to be mentioned in the FIR or in the statements of witnesses on the first day of registration of the FIR. Therefore, the adjudication forums do not entertain the inferences drawn from the forensic analysis of the electronic gadgets, containing the names of some individuals along with certain amounts of money against them.

The courts usually maintain that the concession of bail cannot be withheld from an accused merely on the basis of inferences and presumptuous, instead the prosecution must collect some confidence inspiring incriminating material reasonably connecting the accused with the commission of crime.

Sources in the money exchange market said one big reason behind the growth of hundi/hawala business is the faulty FIRs and statements of witnesses by the FIA officials. They have apprehended that unscrupulous elements within the agency miss out such links to cut underhand deals with the responsible ones.

They are primarily required to prove that the confiscated property is proceeds of crime but no tangible material is collected before prosecuting those involved in the unlawful business of hundi/hawala.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.