AGL 40.21 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.45%)
AIRLINK 127.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.05%)
BOP 6.67 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.91%)
CNERGY 4.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-3.26%)
DCL 8.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.68%)
DFML 41.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-1.01%)
DGKC 86.11 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (0.37%)
FCCL 32.56 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.22%)
FFBL 64.38 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.55%)
FFL 11.61 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (10.05%)
HUBC 112.46 Increased By ▲ 1.69 (1.53%)
HUMNL 14.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-1.73%)
KEL 5.04 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.28%)
KOSM 7.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.21%)
MLCF 40.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.47%)
NBP 61.08 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.05%)
OGDC 194.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-0.35%)
PAEL 26.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-2.18%)
PIBTL 7.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-6.79%)
PPL 152.68 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.1%)
PRL 26.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.35%)
PTC 16.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.74%)
SEARL 85.70 Increased By ▲ 1.56 (1.85%)
TELE 7.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-3.64%)
TOMCL 36.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.36%)
TPLP 8.79 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.5%)
TREET 16.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-4.64%)
TRG 62.74 Increased By ▲ 4.12 (7.03%)
UNITY 28.20 Increased By ▲ 1.34 (4.99%)
WTL 1.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.9%)
BR100 10,086 Increased By 85.5 (0.85%)
BR30 31,170 Increased By 168.1 (0.54%)
KSE100 94,764 Increased By 571.8 (0.61%)
KSE30 29,410 Increased By 209 (0.72%)

This is apropos a Business Recorder op-ed “Latest IMF projections” carried by the newspaper on Tuesday.

The writer, Dr Hafiz A Pasha, has analysed the Fund’s assessment in a meaningful way by saying, among other things, that “however, the outcome of the general election has opened up uncertainties about developments on the political front.

This could heighten risks also on the economic front and make it more difficult to achieve any improvement in the state of the economy.” The focal point of his conclusion, in my view, is the “political front” phrase.

No doubt, the Feb 8 general election has unfortunately given birth to a highly toxic situation owing to deeply polarized mandate besetting the country in which the task of achieving political stability seems to have become a formidable challenge for any political party or a coalition of political parties.

That is why perhaps the recent general election could be described as the most controversial one in the entire history of the country.

Having said that, I wish to make two points in relation to the approaches of two adversarial political forces to the IMF and its programme.

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), which is vying to form its governments at Centre, in Punjab and KP, is not in favor of going back to the IMF; it has even hinted at the possibility of saying goodbye to the lender of last resort for ever.

Insofar as the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) and its partners such as Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) and Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) are concerned, it is increasingly clear that the incoming government’s approach to the Fund would not be different from Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) coalition government’s and its successor or current interim government’s.

The likely arrival of PDM coalition, which is aptly described as ‘PDM 2.0’, will surely augur well for the health of the ongoing Pakistan-IMF Standby Arrangement and the prospects for future Fund programmes for the country.

In other words, the Shehbaz Sharif-led coalition government will be expected to work harder to help lower risks on the economic front. However, it has to be seen how it will go about achieving political stability, which, without an iota of doubt, is a sine qua non of economic stability.

Rasheed Ahmad Chughtai (Karachi)

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.