AIRLINK 176.25 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.2%)
BOP 10.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.73%)
CNERGY 8.22 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.75%)
FCCL 46.70 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (1.26%)
FFL 16.12 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.31%)
FLYNG 27.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.26%)
HUBC 145.98 Increased By ▲ 2.02 (1.4%)
HUMNL 13.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.97%)
KEL 4.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.56%)
KOSM 5.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.5%)
MLCF 60.20 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.18%)
OGDC 230.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.77 (-0.76%)
PACE 5.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.02%)
PAEL 47.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.17%)
PIAHCLA 17.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.28%)
PIBTL 10.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.76%)
POWER 11.38 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 191.31 Decreased By ▼ -1.99 (-1.03%)
PRL 37.35 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.95%)
PTC 23.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.14%)
SEARL 99.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.06%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 37.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.27%)
SYM 14.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.67%)
TELE 7.77 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.26%)
TPLP 10.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.1%)
TRG 65.55 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.63%)
WAVESAPP 10.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.01%)
WTL 1.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.49%)
YOUW 3.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.79%)
AIRLINK 176.25 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.2%)
BOP 10.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.73%)
CNERGY 8.22 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.75%)
FCCL 46.70 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (1.26%)
FFL 16.12 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.31%)
FLYNG 27.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.26%)
HUBC 145.98 Increased By ▲ 2.02 (1.4%)
HUMNL 13.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.97%)
KEL 4.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.56%)
KOSM 5.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.5%)
MLCF 60.20 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.18%)
OGDC 230.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.77 (-0.76%)
PACE 5.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.02%)
PAEL 47.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.17%)
PIAHCLA 17.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.28%)
PIBTL 10.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.76%)
POWER 11.38 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 191.31 Decreased By ▼ -1.99 (-1.03%)
PRL 37.35 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.95%)
PTC 23.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.14%)
SEARL 99.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.06%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 37.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.27%)
SYM 14.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.67%)
TELE 7.77 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.26%)
TPLP 10.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.1%)
TRG 65.55 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.63%)
WAVESAPP 10.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.01%)
WTL 1.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.49%)
YOUW 3.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.79%)
BR100 12,584 Decreased By -24.7 (-0.2%)
BR30 39,264 Increased By 1.7 (0%)
KSE100 117,790 Increased By 17.2 (0.01%)
KSE30 36,299 Increased By 2.6 (0.01%)

The Punjab government has imposed a two-week ban on all public visits, meetings and interviews at Rawalpindi’s Adiala jail. A notification issued in this regard by province’s home department makes an interesting reading, so to speak, as it states, among other things, that “the Internal Security Wing of the Home Department Punjab has conveyed that there exist different types of threats to the security of Adiala Jail as some anti-state terrorist groups supported by the enemies of Pakistan have planned to conduct targeted attacks thereof.

As the purpose of the planned attacks is to create lawlessness and anarchy within the whole country, it is imperative that some measures are taken without delay”. Expectedly, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has assailed the government move, arguing that the ban is aimed at depriving incarcerated party founder Imran Khan of his right to meet his party leaders and family members inside jail.

Although the PTI’s allegations are not misplaced in view of the fact that the party and its leadership have been meted out a shabby and hostile treatment by the successive governments ever since the then prime minister Imran Khan was ousted through a no-confidence motion against him in 2022, the existence of security threats cannot be ruled out.

The powers that are inimical to the existence of Pakistan have been seeking to create a civil war-like situation in the country for quite some time. Carrying out an attack on Imran Khan with a view to eliminating him through their proxies will surely ignite violence on an unimaginable scale in the length and breadth of the country.

It is true that the incumbent government like its successors—interim setup and Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) government—has demonstrated an anti-Imran Khan approach from the day one. It may be true that imposing a two-week ban on his meetings or interviews is a step that does not necessarily stem from security concerns.

But security threats to Imran Khan could also be real. In my view, however, PTI should bide the time. With its strong presence in National Assembly and the assemblies of two key provinces—Punjab and KPK—the party is in a position to continue its protest drive against vote rigging inside assemblies and outside in an effective and meaningful manner.

We all know that jail is where Imran Khan has enough quiet and privacy to strategize and plan for the future. He can still share his thoughts and plans with his party leadership without actually meeting them.

Mehrunnisa Qizlibash

Peshawar

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.