AGL 40.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 130.95 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (1.1%)
BOP 6.75 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.05%)
CNERGY 4.71 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.73%)
DCL 8.98 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.45%)
DFML 43.24 Increased By ▲ 1.55 (3.72%)
DGKC 83.98 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.25%)
FCCL 32.80 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.09%)
FFBL 77.60 Increased By ▲ 2.13 (2.82%)
FFL 11.54 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.61%)
HUBC 111.00 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (0.41%)
HUMNL 14.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.21%)
KEL 5.46 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.3%)
KOSM 8.46 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.71%)
MLCF 40.00 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.53%)
NBP 60.76 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (0.78%)
OGDC 198.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.16 (-0.58%)
PAEL 26.80 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.56%)
PIBTL 7.90 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (3.13%)
PPL 158.98 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (0.67%)
PRL 26.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.75%)
PTC 18.85 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (2.11%)
SEARL 82.66 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.27%)
TELE 8.43 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.44%)
TOMCL 34.80 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.84%)
TPLP 9.19 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.43%)
TREET 17.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.4%)
TRG 61.85 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (0.86%)
UNITY 27.83 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.46%)
WTL 1.39 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.72%)
BR100 10,490 Increased By 83.1 (0.8%)
BR30 31,857 Increased By 144.1 (0.45%)
KSE100 98,015 Increased By 686.2 (0.71%)
KSE30 30,409 Increased By 216.1 (0.72%)

EDITORIAL: The far-right Hindu nationalist government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi had enacted the highly contentious Citizenship (Amendment) Act, in 2019, which fast-tracks citizenship requests from non-Muslims fleeing “religious persecution” from India’s Muslim-majority neighbours — Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladeshi — but excludes Muslim refugees from those countries.

Along with the setting up a national register of citizens (NRC), an equally controversial move, the CAA was aimed at denying Bangladeshi Muslims living in India’s eastern states of citizenship rights, widely seen as a discriminatory legislation for granting citizenship rights to Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, and Parsees to the exclusion of a particular religious community. It could not be implemented until the necessary rules were notified. The Modi government failed to do that in the face of countrywide protests by opposition parties and protracted sit-ins by civil society groups, leading to clashes with the police that left several people dead and hundreds injured.

Yet on Monday India’s home ministry announced the rules allowing the Modi government to bring the divisive law into effect. Why now? Modi who has made a career out of anti-Muslim hate rhetoric and actions is seeking a third term using his party BJP’s Hindutva agenda. The BJP, of course, has hailed the notification on the social media, calling the home ministry’s decision as a “watershed moment in the history of India.” Predictably, however, opposition parties have strongly criticised the government for notifying the rules just weeks before the elections. Congress Party spokesperson Jairam Ramesh questioned its timing, saying: “after seeking nine extensions for the notification of the rules, the timing right before the elections is evidently designed to polarise the elections, especially in West Bengal and Assam.” Notably, those are the two states where majority of Bangladeshi Muslims have settled. Speaking in a similar vein at a news conference, West Bengal chief minister Mamta Banerjee averred, “now that the elections are coming, they have brought this, but it will not benefit anyone”. And in his reaction, president of the Assam Jatiya Parishad termed it “a black day for Assam”.

The BJP has chosen to implement the CAA aware that it will draw another round of protests by people who worry about marginalisation of India’s Muslim community. It is a clever, calculated move as it fits in perfectly well with Narendra Modi’s Hindutva narrative. Louder the protests the more they are likely to rile up his support base, increasing his prospects of returning to the prime minister’s office. That makes it all the more important for others to fight for the restoration of Indian democracy’s founding principle of secularism celebrating its pluralism.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

KU Mar 18, 2024 01:42pm
They will get away with religious genocide as the new world trade order favours them. The recent attack on university students praying on campus tells a lot about their prejudice and state of mind.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Hello Mar 18, 2024 02:07pm
The editorial isnt correct. Muslims from those countries can still apply as refugees under the default law and rules,it may not be as advantageous as CAA.Muslims arent barred from seeking citizenship
thumb_up Recommended (0)