AIRLINK 176.90 Decreased By ▼ -3.46 (-1.92%)
BOP 11.08 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.81%)
CNERGY 8.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
CPHL 97.20 Decreased By ▼ -3.21 (-3.2%)
FCCL 45.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.67%)
FFL 16.00 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.2%)
FLYNG 28.00 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.39%)
HUBC 142.50 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.02%)
HUMNL 13.01 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 4.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.66%)
KOSM 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
MLCF 61.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.81%)
OGDC 212.55 Decreased By ▼ -1.77 (-0.83%)
PACE 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.03%)
PAEL 46.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-0.62%)
PIAHCLA 17.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.18%)
PIBTL 10.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.19%)
POWER 12.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.49%)
PPL 170.43 Decreased By ▼ -2.28 (-1.32%)
PRL 34.79 Decreased By ▼ -1.23 (-3.41%)
PTC 22.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.33%)
SEARL 94.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.16 (-1.21%)
SSGC 40.25 Decreased By ▼ -1.09 (-2.64%)
SYM 14.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.66%)
TELE 7.41 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.41%)
TPLP 10.20 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.19%)
TRG 66.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.50 (-2.21%)
WAVESAPP 10.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
WTL 1.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.49%)
YOUW 3.82 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.26%)
AIRLINK 176.90 Decreased By ▼ -3.46 (-1.92%)
BOP 11.08 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.81%)
CNERGY 8.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
CPHL 97.20 Decreased By ▼ -3.21 (-3.2%)
FCCL 45.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.67%)
FFL 16.00 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.2%)
FLYNG 28.00 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.39%)
HUBC 142.50 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.02%)
HUMNL 13.01 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 4.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.66%)
KOSM 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
MLCF 61.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.81%)
OGDC 212.55 Decreased By ▼ -1.77 (-0.83%)
PACE 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.03%)
PAEL 46.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-0.62%)
PIAHCLA 17.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.18%)
PIBTL 10.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.19%)
POWER 12.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.49%)
PPL 170.43 Decreased By ▼ -2.28 (-1.32%)
PRL 34.79 Decreased By ▼ -1.23 (-3.41%)
PTC 22.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.33%)
SEARL 94.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.16 (-1.21%)
SSGC 40.25 Decreased By ▼ -1.09 (-2.64%)
SYM 14.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.66%)
TELE 7.41 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.41%)
TPLP 10.20 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.19%)
TRG 66.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.50 (-2.21%)
WAVESAPP 10.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
WTL 1.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.49%)
YOUW 3.82 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.26%)
BR100 12,475 Decreased By -6.1 (-0.05%)
BR30 37,685 Decreased By -322.7 (-0.85%)
KSE100 116,805 Increased By 29.5 (0.03%)
KSE30 35,895 Increased By 45.8 (0.13%)

NEW YORK: The U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) criticised the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) on Wednesday for “doubling down on half-truths”, after the global body published a document outlining its handling of a case involving Chinese swimmers.

WADA has been under fire since the New York Times reported, opens new tab last month that 23 Chinese swimmers tested positive for trimetazidine (TMZ) ahead of the Tokyo Games in 2021 but were allowed to compete after being cleared by a Chinese inquiry.

WADA accepted the findings of a Chinese investigation that the swimmers were inadvertently exposed to the drug and the case was not made public.

In a “frequently asked questions” (FAQ) document released days ago, WADA said there were “strong indicators that these cases could be a case of group contamination.”

“The facts and intelligence also support a finding of coordinated intentional doping such that WADA should have initiated an investigation into the source of these positive tests,” USADA wrote on Wednesday.

“But it did not, failing all clean athletes.”

A WADA spokesperson said the organisation stands by the contents of its FAQ sheet and that it “followed every process and line of inquiry when reviewing this file”.

“Based on the science and the verifiable facts, as well as external legal counsel, (WADA) decided not to take what inevitably would have been a doomed appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport,” the spokesperson said in a statement.

“To this day, no evidence has been produced that would change our position on that. Very serious and defamatory allegations continue to be made about WADA without so much as a shred of supporting evidence. WADA continues to reject those allegations as entirely baseless.”

USADA’s 16-page document, opens new tab outlined a wide array of concerns and is the latest salvo in a public spat between the two sides.

WADA said last week that it would launch an independent review over its handling of the case amid a widespread backlash, after USADA called for a complete overhaul of the global body to restore confidence ahead of the Paris Games.

Comments

Comments are closed.