AGL 40.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.4%)
AIRLINK 129.53 Decreased By ▼ -2.20 (-1.67%)
BOP 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
CNERGY 4.63 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.58%)
DCL 8.94 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.36%)
DFML 41.69 Increased By ▲ 1.08 (2.66%)
DGKC 83.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.37%)
FCCL 32.77 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.33%)
FFBL 75.47 Increased By ▲ 6.86 (10%)
FFL 11.47 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.06%)
HUBC 110.55 Decreased By ▼ -1.21 (-1.08%)
HUMNL 14.56 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.75%)
KEL 5.39 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.26%)
KOSM 8.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-6.46%)
MLCF 39.79 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.91%)
NBP 60.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
OGDC 199.66 Increased By ▲ 4.72 (2.42%)
PAEL 26.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.15%)
PIBTL 7.66 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.41%)
PPL 157.92 Increased By ▲ 2.15 (1.38%)
PRL 26.73 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
PTC 18.46 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.87%)
SEARL 82.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-0.7%)
TELE 8.31 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 34.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.12%)
TPLP 9.06 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.84%)
TREET 17.47 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (4.61%)
TRG 61.32 Decreased By ▼ -1.13 (-1.81%)
UNITY 27.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.04%)
WTL 1.38 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (7.81%)
BR100 10,407 Increased By 220 (2.16%)
BR30 31,713 Increased By 377.1 (1.2%)
KSE100 97,328 Increased By 1781.9 (1.86%)
KSE30 30,192 Increased By 614.4 (2.08%)

Exports may be saving the day for many cement manufacturers in FY24. The cement exports share in the total sales mix in last year’s quarterly average (for the first three quarters) was 9 percent. This year, the same has grown to 15 percent. During FY20 and FY21 meanwhile, these averages were 17 percent and 18 percent. Certainly, exports are occupying more space in the total mix in FY24, and yet in value terms (or in terms of their contribution to the mix) they are still not at their peak.

Domestic demand has faltered. In 10MFY24, total cement offtake rose almost 3 percent, only because exports had rebounded from last year’s lows. Locally, sales fell by 4 percent compared to 10MFY23. Domestic demand had seen better days even last year, but this year, average demand in the local markets is lower than it has been since FY17 according to BR Research calculations (Read: “Cement: No steam”, May 14, 2024). Government policies have ensured demand suppression and for many industries, it has worked. Local construction demand appears sensitive to prices as well as income—rising prices and falling incomes weaken demand. This shows in not only cement offtake numbers but other allied industries too including commodities such as steel.

Manufacturers are then left with few options as they struggle to cover their fixed costs. Many cement manufacturers have also raised capacities in the hopes of meeting—what they thought would be—expanding demand. And yet, this cycle of expansion was served a basket of really rotten eggs. In a long stretch between FY17 and FY20, the industry raised capacities in order to meet expected demand from CPEC, and other large infrastructure structures including a massive housing plan that the PTI government had launched its tenure. Much of this demand was being absorbed, with offtake reaching the peak in FY18. In FY23 once again, more capacities came online as cement manufacturers wanted to be prepared for a demand boom. That has yet to come. In FY23, demand plummeted. At the time, exports also remained weak. But companies became more proactive which resulted in exports growing to meet the gap that domestic offtake left vacant. Factors such as favourably high prices, subdued competition in spite of that, lower coal prices and energy efficiency investments have allowed cement companies to stay above the fray without crumbling. FY24 will end on that note.

Comments

200 characters
Az_Iz May 31, 2024 04:36pm
Surviving in a tough environment without seeking dole outs from the government.One should appreciate that.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply