AGL 40.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.4%)
AIRLINK 129.53 Decreased By ▼ -2.20 (-1.67%)
BOP 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
CNERGY 4.63 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.58%)
DCL 8.94 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.36%)
DFML 41.69 Increased By ▲ 1.08 (2.66%)
DGKC 83.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.37%)
FCCL 32.77 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.33%)
FFBL 75.47 Increased By ▲ 6.86 (10%)
FFL 11.47 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.06%)
HUBC 110.55 Decreased By ▼ -1.21 (-1.08%)
HUMNL 14.56 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.75%)
KEL 5.39 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.26%)
KOSM 8.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-6.46%)
MLCF 39.79 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.91%)
NBP 60.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
OGDC 199.66 Increased By ▲ 4.72 (2.42%)
PAEL 26.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.15%)
PIBTL 7.66 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.41%)
PPL 157.92 Increased By ▲ 2.15 (1.38%)
PRL 26.73 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
PTC 18.46 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.87%)
SEARL 82.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-0.7%)
TELE 8.31 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 34.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.12%)
TPLP 9.06 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.84%)
TREET 17.47 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (4.61%)
TRG 61.32 Decreased By ▼ -1.13 (-1.81%)
UNITY 27.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.04%)
WTL 1.38 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (7.81%)
BR100 10,407 Increased By 220 (2.16%)
BR30 31,713 Increased By 377.1 (1.2%)
KSE100 97,328 Increased By 1781.9 (1.86%)
KSE30 30,192 Increased By 614.4 (2.08%)

LAHORE: The Commissioner Inland Revenue, RTO-lI Lahore, has failed to establish chargeability of capital gain on disposal of immovable property between the spouses, said sources.

According to the notice issued by the department, the wife was confronted that she should pay tax @ 5% on gain on sale of immovable property.

However, after failing to convince the Commissioner Appeals, the department approached the appellate tribunal and argued that the immovable property in question was acquired by the taxpayer from her spouse through gift in July 2013, which was disposed of in April 2015.

The taxpayer, on the other hand, submitted that the property in question was gifted by spouse in June 2013. The agreement of sell with third party was executed on April 2015, and the gain arising on such immovable property was partially received, and the remaining balance amount was receivable in June 2015, but, by the end of the financial tax year 2015 i.e. 30th June 2015, the remaining amount was not received by the Respondent.

As a result, the Respondent declared/booked the same as receivable in her wealth statement as on 30th June 2015. Subsequently, the same was received in July 2015, thus, the property was transferred to the buyer.

The tribunal held that the property in question was acquired by the taxpayer from her husband through gift and the acquisition of such asset has been acquired with the same character as the person disposing of the asset. As the date of acquisition in the hands of spouse was 28.11.1991 hence, the date of acquisition remains the same for the present taxpayer as well. This intent of law is evident as transfer of asset between spouses is not a taxable event.

The ATIR further held that the Officer Income Tax had wrongly noted it as July 2013. The execution of sale of such property was not completed by 15.06.2015 as per agreement to sell on account of non-payment, therefore, the taxpayer declared the balance amount as receivable in the wealth Statement for the Tax Year 2015. However, the final payment was received on 09.07.2015 by the learned Respondent.

The ATIR held that the holding period is more than two years. Hence, the capital gain in such case is 0% as per section 37(1A) read with Division VIII of Part-l of First Schedule of ITO.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.