AIRLINK 182.71 Increased By ▲ 2.54 (1.41%)
BOP 10.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.97 (-8.49%)
CNERGY 8.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.4%)
CPHL 94.21 Decreased By ▼ -1.02 (-1.07%)
FCCL 46.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.52%)
FFL 16.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.74%)
FLYNG 28.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.52%)
HUBC 145.78 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (0.37%)
HUMNL 13.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.53%)
KEL 4.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-2%)
KOSM 5.79 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.12%)
MLCF 67.30 Decreased By ▼ -2.14 (-3.08%)
OGDC 213.28 Increased By ▲ 1.05 (0.49%)
PACE 6.08 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1%)
PAEL 47.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.1%)
PIAHCLA 17.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.17%)
PIBTL 9.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-6.24%)
POWER 14.26 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (5.32%)
PPL 170.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.09%)
PRL 34.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-1.93%)
PTC 22.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-1.81%)
SEARL 95.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.79 (-0.82%)
SSGC 42.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.27 (-2.93%)
SYM 15.61 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (10.01%)
TELE 7.47 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (2.75%)
TPLP 9.99 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.01%)
TRG 66.89 Increased By ▲ 1.29 (1.97%)
WAVESAPP 9.88 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.82%)
WTL 1.35 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.5%)
YOUW 3.83 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (2.41%)
AIRLINK 182.71 Increased By ▲ 2.54 (1.41%)
BOP 10.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.97 (-8.49%)
CNERGY 8.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.4%)
CPHL 94.21 Decreased By ▼ -1.02 (-1.07%)
FCCL 46.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.52%)
FFL 16.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.74%)
FLYNG 28.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.52%)
HUBC 145.78 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (0.37%)
HUMNL 13.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.53%)
KEL 4.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-2%)
KOSM 5.79 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.12%)
MLCF 67.30 Decreased By ▼ -2.14 (-3.08%)
OGDC 213.28 Increased By ▲ 1.05 (0.49%)
PACE 6.08 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1%)
PAEL 47.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.1%)
PIAHCLA 17.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.17%)
PIBTL 9.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-6.24%)
POWER 14.26 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (5.32%)
PPL 170.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.09%)
PRL 34.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-1.93%)
PTC 22.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-1.81%)
SEARL 95.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.79 (-0.82%)
SSGC 42.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.27 (-2.93%)
SYM 15.61 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (10.01%)
TELE 7.47 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (2.75%)
TPLP 9.99 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.01%)
TRG 66.89 Increased By ▲ 1.29 (1.97%)
WAVESAPP 9.88 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.82%)
WTL 1.35 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.5%)
YOUW 3.83 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (2.41%)
BR100 12,666 Decreased By -36.5 (-0.29%)
BR30 38,108 Decreased By -149.5 (-0.39%)
KSE100 118,430 Increased By 47 (0.04%)
KSE30 36,403 Increased By 8.1 (0.02%)

EDITORIAL: Evidently embarrassed at the Punjab government’s enactment of a new defamation law, roundly condemned by the media and civil society, the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), a quasi-partner of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), is trying to distance itself from it.

At a presser on Monday the party’s central Punjab general secretary Syed Hassan Murtaza explained that the bill was introduced in the provincial assembly without consultation with the PPP, and when most of its members were absent from the House.

Critics, though, question their en masse nonappearance, suggesting that the party’s present stance is for the sake of appearances. But Murtaza announced that the PPP would go to court against the law after its high command makes a decision.

Clearly meant to control the traditional and social media, the law has already been challenged first in the Sindh High Court, and now in the Lahore High Court by two journalists on the obvious grounds that it is in sheer violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution as well as the right to a fair trial in every case.

All print and electronic media bodies are also up in arms against this transparent attempt to suppress dissenting voices. If the fake news spread by social media is a concern, as articulated by some, the existing defamation law is good enough to deal with any harm or damage caused to the reputation of a person.

The driving force behind the law seems to be the main opposition party’s political narrative, especially on social media. It may have been disturbing some people’s peace of mind, but that should be no excuse to clamp down on freedom of expression.

It is worth recalling in this context that during the 2016 US presidential election campaign, Russia was accused of spreading damaging propaganda on social media to help Donald Trump win the White House. Then president Barack Obama had even ordered a “full review” of the alleged interference, but no restriction was placed on social media users since the country’s defamation law is equally applicable to everyone, whether private citizens or in the media. Abridging of freedom of speech or the press is strictly prohibited. Functioning democracies protect rather than make compromises on freedom of expression.

The PPP is expected to take a clear and strong stand on this highly controversial piece of legislation. The ruling PML-N also needs to realise that power is a fickle mistress. Sooner or later the situation will change. What will serve it in the longer run are its policies that bring about improvement in the lives of the people, and also safeguard democratic values. One can only hope good sense will prevail and the government will withdraw the Defamation Act, widely seen as a black law.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

KU Jun 12, 2024 12:21pm
Relevant defamation parallels can be quoted from history, which were used to gag media from exposing the corrupt n injustice. This law is a true milestone to despotic rule by the corrupt.
thumb_up Recommended (0)