AGL 38.89 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (0.86%)
AIRLINK 218.65 Increased By ▲ 10.88 (5.24%)
BOP 10.40 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (3.38%)
CNERGY 7.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.42%)
DCL 10.02 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.3%)
DFML 41.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.12%)
DGKC 104.90 Increased By ▲ 1.44 (1.39%)
FCCL 36.85 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.38%)
FFBL 93.11 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (1.66%)
FFL 14.67 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.48%)
HUBC 140.95 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (1.09%)
HUMNL 14.30 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (1.42%)
KEL 6.00 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.5%)
KOSM 7.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.78%)
MLCF 47.80 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (1.1%)
NBP 70.80 Decreased By ▼ -2.96 (-4.01%)
OGDC 229.05 Increased By ▲ 6.39 (2.87%)
PAEL 39.10 Increased By ▲ 0.99 (2.6%)
PIBTL 9.32 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.54%)
PPL 210.00 Increased By ▲ 4.15 (2.02%)
PRL 40.98 Increased By ▲ 1.13 (2.84%)
PTC 26.98 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (1.35%)
SEARL 110.80 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (0.51%)
TELE 9.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.98%)
TOMCL 38.84 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (1.65%)
TPLP 14.09 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (2.32%)
TREET 26.50 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
TRG 60.60 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.1%)
UNITY 34.30 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.47%)
WTL 1.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-1.6%)
BR100 12,438 Increased By 139.3 (1.13%)
BR30 39,420 Increased By 542.4 (1.4%)
KSE100 115,334 Increased By 473.6 (0.41%)
KSE30 36,354 Increased By 158.2 (0.44%)

This is apropos a letter to the Editor by this writer with the above headline carried by the newspaper recently.

I would like to add to what I have already said that the US and Europe may impose economic sanctions targeting key sectors of the Russian economy, such as energy and finance, and cyber countermeasures to strengthen defenses and retaliate against Russian attacks.

Diplomatically, they would isolate Russia internationally, rallying condemnation through forums like the UN and strengthening alliances with countries opposed to Russian actions.

Each of these actions carries significant risks and could lead to unpredictable and potentially catastrophic consequences, requiring careful international responses to avoid a broader and more devastating conflict.

Moreover, the implementation of Russia’s aggressive strategy and NATO’s counter-strategy would severely impact weaker economies like Pakistan’s.

Disruptions in Russian energy supplies to Europe would cause global energy prices to soar.

Pakistan, heavily reliant on energy imports, would face drastically increased fuel and electricity costs, straining its economy. This surge would lead to higher transportation, manufacturing, and household energy expenses, exacerbating inflation and reducing disposable income for its citizens.

The conflict would likely disrupt global supply chains, affecting shipping routes and logistics networks. Pakistan, which depends on imports for essential goods and raw materials, would experience delays and increased costs.

This disruption could lead to shortages of critical items, higher import prices, and further inflation, negatively impacting both consumers and businesses.

Financial markets would experience significant volatility, with investors seeking safer assets amid the uncertainty. This could result in capital outflows from emerging markets like Pakistan, causing the Pakistani rupee to depreciate.

A weaker currency would make imports more expensive, further fueling inflation and increasing the cost of servicing external debt, straining Pakistan’s financial stability.

QAMAR BASHIR

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.