AGL 40.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.02%)
AIRLINK 127.85 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.12%)
BOP 6.71 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.51%)
CNERGY 4.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-2.83%)
DCL 8.90 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.25%)
DFML 41.65 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.17%)
DGKC 87.00 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (1.41%)
FCCL 32.73 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.74%)
FFBL 64.62 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (0.92%)
FFL 11.45 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (8.53%)
HUBC 111.50 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (0.66%)
HUMNL 14.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.33%)
KEL 4.94 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.23%)
KOSM 7.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.07%)
MLCF 40.90 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (0.94%)
NBP 61.39 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (0.56%)
OGDC 194.98 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.06%)
PAEL 27.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.11%)
PIBTL 7.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.38%)
PPL 153.20 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (0.44%)
PRL 26.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.23%)
PTC 16.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.98%)
SEARL 84.60 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (0.55%)
TELE 7.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.38%)
TOMCL 36.90 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.82%)
TPLP 8.80 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.62%)
TREET 17.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-3.68%)
TRG 57.61 Decreased By ▼ -1.01 (-1.72%)
UNITY 26.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.3%)
WTL 1.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-3.62%)
BR100 10,000 No Change 0 (0%)
BR30 31,002 No Change 0 (0%)
KSE100 94,711 Increased By 519.6 (0.55%)
KSE30 29,401 Increased By 199.5 (0.68%)

FRANKFURT, (Germany): Companies in Germany can only promote their products as “climate neutral” if they back up the environmental claims with sufficient detail in the advert itself, a top court ruled Thursday.

The ruling was made in a case brought against German confectionery manufacturer Katjes by an association that aims to tackle unfair business practices.

It centred on an advert that appeared in a trade publication for the food industry, which stated that “since 2021, Katjes has been producing all products in a climate-neutral fashion”.

It included a picture of a packet of fruit gums with a “climate neutral” logo and the website address of a partner firm that helps companies in reducing their greenhouse gas emissions.

The ruling found the production of the sweets was not carbon-neutral however — rather, the confectionery manufacturer supported environmental protection projects to offset emissions through its partner.

Two lower courts had dismissed the case but the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) ruled in favour of the association, the Centre for Combatting Unfair Competition.

“In the case of advertising that uses an ambiguous environmental term such as ‘climate neutral’, the specific meaning must be explained in the advertising itself in order to avoid misleading the public,” the court said in its decision.

The risks of misleading were “particularly high” in environment-related advertising, it said, adding that labels such as “climate neutral” were important for consumers when making purchasing decisions.

When it came to the Katjes advert, it was vital to explain the claim as directly reducing emissions is considered more important for climate protection than offsetting them, the court found.

Comments

Comments are closed.