AIRLINK 88.73 Increased By ▲ 1.18 (1.35%)
BOP 5.07 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (4.75%)
CNERGY 3.87 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (2.93%)
DFML 43.15 Increased By ▲ 2.62 (6.46%)
DGKC 90.48 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (0.79%)
FCCL 22.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.31%)
FFBL 38.15 Increased By ▲ 1.62 (4.43%)
FFL 9.20 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2%)
GGL 9.58 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.27%)
HASCOL 6.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.15%)
HBL 126.00 Increased By ▲ 1.05 (0.84%)
HUBC 164.00 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.15%)
HUMNL 10.62 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (3.51%)
KEL 4.71 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.52%)
KOSM 4.25 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (3.41%)
MLCF 37.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.53%)
OGDC 136.00 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.18%)
PAEL 25.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.28%)
PIBTL 6.20 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.81%)
PPL 123.77 Increased By ▲ 2.87 (2.37%)
PRL 23.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.39%)
PTC 12.63 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.08%)
SEARL 58.68 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (1%)
SNGP 66.10 Increased By ▲ 1.82 (2.83%)
SSGC 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.72%)
TELE 7.60 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.29%)
TPLP 8.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.23%)
TRG 62.30 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (0.89%)
UNITY 31.29 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.1%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.4%)
BR100 8,429 Increased By 101 (1.21%)
BR30 26,963 Increased By 257.7 (0.97%)
KSE100 79,553 Increased By 728.6 (0.92%)
KSE30 25,584 Increased By 214.3 (0.84%)

EDITORIAL: Confirming media reports that India has been providing drones and artillery shells to his country in its war on Gaza, a former Israeli ambassador to New Delhi, Daniel Carmon, has justified it as reciprocation for Tel Aviv’s support during the 1999 Kargil conflict with Pakistan. “The Indians”, he said, in an interview with a news outlet of that country, “don’t forget this and might now be returning the favour”.

Indeed, New Delhi received military supplies, including guided munitions and drones from Tel Aviv for its confrontation with Pakistan. This though did not happen in a vacuum. Although after initially voting against the establishment of Israel, India recognised it in 1950; but relations remained lukewarm in the next five decades; for the most part because India under Jawaharlal Nehru, who along with four other leaders, including Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt, founded the Non-Aligned Movement, did not want to offend the Arab countries. So the friendship failed to gain traction.

Interestingly, however, as revealed by thousands of Israeli documents declassified earlier this year, from the mid ’60s onwards the country, surrounded by its then hostile Arab neighbours, started forging ties with Hindu nationalist parties in India for their hatred of Muslims.

The strategy worked best when Narendra Modi came to power in 2014, and openly embraced Israel becoming the first Indian prime minister to visit Israel. The bond since has been growing from strength to strength, reinforcing ties in trade, defence and some other fields.

Yet adept at playing the game of running with the hare and hunting with the hounds, the Modi government has strongly condemned Israel’s actions in Gaza, terming the humanitarian crisis in the besieged enclave as “simply unacceptable”. That it said while supplying the aggressor with lethal weaponry for its campaign of genocide against the Gaza Palestinians.

Not very different is the policy towards the wider Gulf region. On the one hand, India maintains close economic and political relations with oil-rich Arab states, especially Saudi Arabia and the UAE, describing them together with Israel as its strategic partners.

On the other hand, it has significant economic engagement with their regional rival, Iran, from which not only it imports oil — disregarding US sanctions on that country — but has also helped Tehran develop the Chabahar Port which is to serve as major trading hub, connecting India via the port to Afghanistan and Central Asian states.

In theory ethics are central to international relations, but in practice increasingly assigned to the margins. India, obviously, subscribes to another view advanced by some scholars, according to which, the states’ behaviour is neither moral nor immoral — it is simply amoral. Ethics have no places in the conduct of its foreign policy.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

200 characters
KU Jun 28, 2024 11:54am
When they see economic power, wise countries invest for future, morality/ethics is now euphemism. Lessons to be learnt is to become economic power with resolve, because we may be threatened next.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Re=== Jun 29, 2024 07:05pm
Look Indians make practical decisions in the interest of one thing--their country. Which country is based on morality and ethics? Pakistan?
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Re=== Jun 30, 2024 05:35pm
Ethics have no place in the conduct of its foreign policy- where you have been living under a rock all these years and suddenly woke up to find this. Does Pak, China, USA, UK, Russia, have ethics?
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply