AGL 37.47 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.59%)
AIRLINK 123.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-0.5%)
BOP 5.85 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (4.09%)
CNERGY 3.72 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DCL 8.45 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (2.42%)
DFML 40.65 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (0.94%)
DGKC 86.00 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.3%)
FCCL 33.19 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (1.81%)
FFBL 66.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.38%)
FFL 10.16 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUBC 105.25 Increased By ▲ 2.15 (2.09%)
HUMNL 13.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.37%)
KEL 4.30 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.18%)
KOSM 7.24 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.84%)
MLCF 38.65 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.91%)
NBP 63.70 Decreased By ▼ -1.31 (-2.02%)
OGDC 174.55 Increased By ▲ 0.75 (0.43%)
PAEL 25.11 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.84%)
PIBTL 5.80 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 142.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.14%)
PRL 23.02 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.17%)
PTC 15.45 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (2.25%)
SEARL 65.50 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.23%)
TELE 7.03 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.43%)
TOMCL 36.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-1.11%)
TPLP 7.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.54%)
TREET 14.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.56%)
TRG 50.90 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (2.41%)
UNITY 26.69 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (2.07%)
WTL 1.25 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.81%)
BR100 9,635 Increased By 33.3 (0.35%)
BR30 28,770 Increased By 196.9 (0.69%)
KSE100 90,635 Increased By 348.3 (0.39%)
KSE30 28,344 Increased By 0.7 (0%)

EDITORIAL: The Board of Directors (BoD) of the Pakistan Steel Mills (PSM) is either reading too much into recent headlines or it understands that the situation is so bad that murmurs in the press about the government finally shutting it down for good might really be true this time.

Either way, the Board has clearly been jolted enough to reach out to both the SIFC (Special Investment Facilitation Council) and the prime minister’s office, strongly opposing “complete closure” as “ill advised”.

This issue, and the bigger financial black hole that most SOEs (State-Owned Enterprises) have become, is as old as time in this country. But now things are really so bad that this haemorrhaging will simply have to stop; not least to stay on the IMF programme and unlock its later tranches. It is, therefore, troubling, that even as PSM advocates a “comprehensive liability settlement exercise” – and then getting on with business as usual – and the government seems to be sharpening the axe, there’s no serious debate about privatisation.

That those speaking for SOEs, and benefitting from the trillions the government sinks into them every year, would be inherently biased against such a course of action is only natural, and quite understandable. Yet, once again, there’s nothing left in the kitty to fund their expensive life-support any longer; and it would not have been wise to do so even if there was a little more money to burn in the reserves.

It’s shocking that the country’s decision-makers have still not realised that they have neither the money nor the time to keep juggling the same options over and over again.

For the sake of national interest, they must do what is needed to proceed with privatisation of all sick SOEs and slowly remove this tumor from the national economy. Unfortunately, even before specialists and experts can sit down for extremely complicated calculations, there will be political hurdles to overcome in a cabinet badly split on the issue.

Let’s remember that this coalition government tried to look strong coming out of a disputed election by claiming that it understood the gravity of the economic collapse and therefore was the only administration capable of “doing whatever it takes” to get the economy up and running again. Surely, it would have understood that everything hinged on another IMF bailout, and SOEs were going to be a central part of the wider debate and, of course, one of the biggest problems in the economy.

Yet here we stand, wasting more resources and still getting nowhere. The government must indeed engage all stakeholders, as PSM has rightly demanded. But the agenda should be identifying points of convergence, followed by a process of give-and-take so all parties can find common ground for privatisation. Then this process should be extended to other loss-makers.

This debate, and the burden on the economy (read honest taxpayers), has gone on long enough. The government cannot kick this can any further down the road. If it does not get its act together even now, the whole house of cards will collapse, and it will go down in history as the administration that did not do what would still have given the economy one last fighting chance.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

Fatima Jul 19, 2024 09:28am
PSM is the pride of the nation, a nation that can’t produce steel is not a nation.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
KU Jul 19, 2024 11:45am
A country over run by crooks n cartels, they can appose/threat privatization, despite the losses Rs. 30 billion in 2024, total loss to date over Rs. 230 billion n Rs. 1.24 billion for salaries/perks.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Tariq Qurashi Jul 19, 2024 12:06pm
Privatize PSM but insist it is made operational to make steel locally. Steel is the basis of all industrialization and the country needs it.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
M. Zahid Iftikhar Jul 19, 2024 03:22pm
No debate. Sell these leeches & save our taxes. To hell with PPP, PTI, & whoever else opposes SOE sell-off. Enough already!
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Nawaz Jul 19, 2024 04:00pm
There is a need to simplify the privatization/ sell off procedure. the current process is too lengthy. The unnecessary steps should be deleted. this privatization process is obsolete and cannot work
thumb_up Recommended (0)