AGL 40.21 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.45%)
AIRLINK 127.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.05%)
BOP 6.67 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.91%)
CNERGY 4.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-3.26%)
DCL 8.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.68%)
DFML 41.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-1.01%)
DGKC 86.11 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (0.37%)
FCCL 32.56 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.22%)
FFBL 64.38 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.55%)
FFL 11.61 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (10.05%)
HUBC 112.46 Increased By ▲ 1.69 (1.53%)
HUMNL 14.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-1.73%)
KEL 5.04 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.28%)
KOSM 7.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.21%)
MLCF 40.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.47%)
NBP 61.08 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.05%)
OGDC 194.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-0.35%)
PAEL 26.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-2.18%)
PIBTL 7.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-6.79%)
PPL 152.68 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.1%)
PRL 26.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.35%)
PTC 16.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.74%)
SEARL 85.70 Increased By ▲ 1.56 (1.85%)
TELE 7.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-3.64%)
TOMCL 36.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.36%)
TPLP 8.79 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.5%)
TREET 16.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-4.64%)
TRG 62.74 Increased By ▲ 4.12 (7.03%)
UNITY 28.20 Increased By ▲ 1.34 (4.99%)
WTL 1.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.9%)
BR100 10,086 Increased By 85.5 (0.85%)
BR30 31,170 Increased By 168.1 (0.54%)
KSE100 94,764 Increased By 571.8 (0.61%)
KSE30 29,410 Increased By 209 (0.72%)

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has expressed serious concern over delay in the release of an imported Mercedes Benz, as Customs department refused to accept manufacturing date of used vehicle for assessment of duties/taxes.

In this regard, the FTO has issued an order against Collectorate of Customs Appraisement (East), Karachi.

The complaint was filed in terms of Section 10(1) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 (FTO Ordinance), against Collectorate of Customs Appraisement (East), Karachi, for consideration of manufacturing date of vehicle as per manufacturing company for assessment of duty/taxes.

The department should have kept all the above narrated facts and legal provisions in view and should have contacted the Actual Manufacturers of the impugned vehicle i.e. Mercedies Benz, Germany, instead of simply relying upon the info provided by their local agent viz Shahnawaz (Pvt) Ltd and on vin-info.com an independent website while “Oasis” is reportedly the official website).

Briefly, a used vehicle, Mercedes Benz, was shipped from UK on July 17, 2023, consigned to Khatoon, which, arrived at Karachi Port on August 13, 2023. On 07.08.2023, a letter was already being issued to Shahnawaz (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi, by Collectorate of Customs Appraisement (East), Karachi, for supply of Import Trade price (ITP) for the said vehicle. It replied, mentioning the total value as $99,447 and date of production as March 2022.

The clearing agent approached the office of Shahnawaz Ltd with the plea that the said vehicle is 2021 manufactured as well as few extra options are mentioned which are not fitted in the vehicle but they refused to make any changes. So, the complainant emailed a complaint to their principles Mercedes Benz Daimler along with proof of their claim, who forwarded the complaint to their Middle East regional office.

Shahnawaz respond through an email mentioning that they oversaw a few options which brought the total Import Trade Price (ITP) value down to $ 96,833 but still mentioned the date of production as March 2022. Shahnawaz Ltd are taking the date of shipment/delivery to Mercedese Benz UK dealer as the date of production.

According to the CGO14/2005, the assessment can only be made from the date of production and not from the date of shipment/delivery to the Mercedes Benz dealer.

Hence, Shahnawaz is deliberately not mentioning the actual date of production just to discourage the import of used Mercedes Benz vehicles. Another factory document known as Certificate of Conformity (CCC) was issued and placed in the vehicle right after the vehicle leaves the factory. The year of manufacture on this CCC document was mentioned as 2021.

In view of supra, it is evident that the issue of manufacturing date of the subject vehicle is a unique case in view of temporary closure of manufacturing process due to COVID lock down and remains the core issue of the subject complaint.

Therefore, the department should either have accepted the Certificate of Conformity (CoG) as sufficient evidence provided by the Complainant or should have approached the concerned manufacturing unit of the company i.e. Mercedes Benz, Germany, for verification and confirmation of manufacturing date of the said vehicle instead of simply relying upon the challenged information provided by the local agent. This confirms an unjust and discriminatory decision making by the department due to its neglects, inattention, delay, incompetence and inefficiency and is tantamount to maladministration, the FTO order stated.

The FTO has recommended the FBR to direct Collector of Customs Appraisement (East) to verify the certificate of conformity issued by the manufacturer i.e. Mercedes Benz under Article 6 of EU Council Directive No.92/53 which clearly states the date of manufacturing as March 25, 2021, directly from the manufacturing company; i.e., Mercedes Benz, Germany, as soon as possible but not later than 30 days, in case the verification is not made within the given timeline by the department, the documentary evidence of Certificate of Conformity (CCC) issued by the manufacturer, be used for determination of the year of manufacturing and the assessment be made accordingly, as per law, the FTO order added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.