AGL 38.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.16%)
AIRLINK 212.00 Increased By ▲ 4.23 (2.04%)
BOP 9.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.59%)
CNERGY 6.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-7.49%)
DCL 9.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-3.1%)
DFML 40.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.14 (-2.77%)
DGKC 99.50 Decreased By ▼ -3.96 (-3.83%)
FCCL 34.76 Decreased By ▼ -1.59 (-4.37%)
FFBL 87.75 Decreased By ▼ -3.84 (-4.19%)
FFL 13.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-4.52%)
HUBC 131.75 Decreased By ▼ -7.68 (-5.51%)
HUMNL 14.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.71%)
KEL 5.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-5.36%)
KOSM 7.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-7.12%)
MLCF 46.11 Decreased By ▼ -1.17 (-2.47%)
NBP 66.38 Decreased By ▼ -7.38 (-10.01%)
OGDC 218.45 Decreased By ▼ -4.21 (-1.89%)
PAEL 38.11 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PIBTL 8.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-4.75%)
PPL 197.80 Decreased By ▼ -8.05 (-3.91%)
PRL 39.85 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PTC 25.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.87 (-3.27%)
SEARL 102.76 Decreased By ▼ -7.48 (-6.79%)
TELE 9.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.52%)
TOMCL 37.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.21 (-3.17%)
TPLP 13.97 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (1.45%)
TREET 25.30 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-4.35%)
TRG 58.50 Decreased By ▼ -2.04 (-3.37%)
UNITY 33.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.05%)
WTL 1.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-7.45%)
BR100 11,960 Decreased By -338.7 (-2.75%)
BR30 37,549 Decreased By -1328 (-3.42%)
KSE100 111,447 Decreased By -3414.1 (-2.97%)
KSE30 34,968 Decreased By -1228.4 (-3.39%)

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has expressed serious concern over delay in the release of an imported Mercedes Benz, as Customs department refused to accept manufacturing date of used vehicle for assessment of duties/taxes.

In this regard, the FTO has issued an order against Collectorate of Customs Appraisement (East), Karachi.

The complaint was filed in terms of Section 10(1) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 (FTO Ordinance), against Collectorate of Customs Appraisement (East), Karachi, for consideration of manufacturing date of vehicle as per manufacturing company for assessment of duty/taxes.

The department should have kept all the above narrated facts and legal provisions in view and should have contacted the Actual Manufacturers of the impugned vehicle i.e. Mercedies Benz, Germany, instead of simply relying upon the info provided by their local agent viz Shahnawaz (Pvt) Ltd and on vin-info.com an independent website while “Oasis” is reportedly the official website).

Briefly, a used vehicle, Mercedes Benz, was shipped from UK on July 17, 2023, consigned to Khatoon, which, arrived at Karachi Port on August 13, 2023. On 07.08.2023, a letter was already being issued to Shahnawaz (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi, by Collectorate of Customs Appraisement (East), Karachi, for supply of Import Trade price (ITP) for the said vehicle. It replied, mentioning the total value as $99,447 and date of production as March 2022.

The clearing agent approached the office of Shahnawaz Ltd with the plea that the said vehicle is 2021 manufactured as well as few extra options are mentioned which are not fitted in the vehicle but they refused to make any changes. So, the complainant emailed a complaint to their principles Mercedes Benz Daimler along with proof of their claim, who forwarded the complaint to their Middle East regional office.

Shahnawaz respond through an email mentioning that they oversaw a few options which brought the total Import Trade Price (ITP) value down to $ 96,833 but still mentioned the date of production as March 2022. Shahnawaz Ltd are taking the date of shipment/delivery to Mercedese Benz UK dealer as the date of production.

According to the CGO14/2005, the assessment can only be made from the date of production and not from the date of shipment/delivery to the Mercedes Benz dealer.

Hence, Shahnawaz is deliberately not mentioning the actual date of production just to discourage the import of used Mercedes Benz vehicles. Another factory document known as Certificate of Conformity (CCC) was issued and placed in the vehicle right after the vehicle leaves the factory. The year of manufacture on this CCC document was mentioned as 2021.

In view of supra, it is evident that the issue of manufacturing date of the subject vehicle is a unique case in view of temporary closure of manufacturing process due to COVID lock down and remains the core issue of the subject complaint.

Therefore, the department should either have accepted the Certificate of Conformity (CoG) as sufficient evidence provided by the Complainant or should have approached the concerned manufacturing unit of the company i.e. Mercedes Benz, Germany, for verification and confirmation of manufacturing date of the said vehicle instead of simply relying upon the challenged information provided by the local agent. This confirms an unjust and discriminatory decision making by the department due to its neglects, inattention, delay, incompetence and inefficiency and is tantamount to maladministration, the FTO order stated.

The FTO has recommended the FBR to direct Collector of Customs Appraisement (East) to verify the certificate of conformity issued by the manufacturer i.e. Mercedes Benz under Article 6 of EU Council Directive No.92/53 which clearly states the date of manufacturing as March 25, 2021, directly from the manufacturing company; i.e., Mercedes Benz, Germany, as soon as possible but not later than 30 days, in case the verification is not made within the given timeline by the department, the documentary evidence of Certificate of Conformity (CCC) issued by the manufacturer, be used for determination of the year of manufacturing and the assessment be made accordingly, as per law, the FTO order added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.