AIRLINK 188.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.01%)
BOP 12.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-2.19%)
CNERGY 7.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.55%)
FCCL 40.55 Increased By ▲ 1.84 (4.75%)
FFL 15.10 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.75%)
FLYNG 25.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-1.7%)
HUBC 132.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.91 (-1.42%)
HUMNL 13.45 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.9%)
KEL 4.88 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (15.37%)
KOSM 6.48 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (10.77%)
MLCF 47.14 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.53%)
OGDC 204.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-0.46%)
PACE 6.27 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (3.13%)
PAEL 38.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.23%)
PIAHCLA 16.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.12%)
PIBTL 8.11 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (3.44%)
POWER 10.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.19%)
PPL 173.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.96 (-0.55%)
PRL 34.10 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (1.25%)
PTC 23.49 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (1.78%)
SEARL 99.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (0.49%)
SILK 1.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.79%)
SSGC 30.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.86 (-2.73%)
SYM 17.83 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.96%)
TELE 8.19 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.61%)
TPLP 12.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.66%)
TRG 61.11 Increased By ▲ 0.81 (1.34%)
WAVESAPP 11.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.85%)
WTL 1.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.33%)
YOUW 4.21 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (9.07%)
AIRLINK 188.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.01%)
BOP 12.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-2.19%)
CNERGY 7.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.55%)
FCCL 40.55 Increased By ▲ 1.84 (4.75%)
FFL 15.10 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.75%)
FLYNG 25.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-1.7%)
HUBC 132.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.91 (-1.42%)
HUMNL 13.45 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.9%)
KEL 4.88 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (15.37%)
KOSM 6.48 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (10.77%)
MLCF 47.14 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.53%)
OGDC 204.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-0.46%)
PACE 6.27 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (3.13%)
PAEL 38.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.23%)
PIAHCLA 16.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.12%)
PIBTL 8.11 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (3.44%)
POWER 10.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.19%)
PPL 173.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.96 (-0.55%)
PRL 34.10 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (1.25%)
PTC 23.49 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (1.78%)
SEARL 99.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (0.49%)
SILK 1.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.79%)
SSGC 30.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.86 (-2.73%)
SYM 17.83 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.96%)
TELE 8.19 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.61%)
TPLP 12.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.66%)
TRG 61.11 Increased By ▲ 0.81 (1.34%)
WAVESAPP 11.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.85%)
WTL 1.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.33%)
YOUW 4.21 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (9.07%)
BR100 11,905 Decreased By -12.8 (-0.11%)
BR30 35,359 Increased By 40.9 (0.12%)
KSE100 113,342 Increased By 254 (0.22%)
KSE30 35,292 Decreased By -16.7 (-0.05%)

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC), Wednesday, set aside the Islamabad chief commissioner’s order to revoke the No Objection Certificate (NOC), granted to the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) for holding a rally.

A single bench of IHC comprising Chief Justice of IHC Justice Aamer Farooq issued the judgment in a petition of the PTI through its president Islamabad chapter Aamer Masood Mughal.

Mughal moved the court through his counsel Shoaib Shaheen advocate and challenged the order dated 05.07.2024 passed by respondent No2 (Chief Commissioner Islamabad), whereby, NOC, granted to the petitioner for holding a rally in Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT), was revoked.

Counsel for the petitioner contended that in the similar facts and circumstances, this court vide order dated 27.03.2024 in case titled Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf through Aamer Masood Mughal (President, Islamabad Region) Vs. Federation of Pakistan etc (W.P. No.1026-2024), allowed the petition and set aside decision taken by the deputy commissioner.

It was further contended that at present, the facts and circumstances, are quite similar, hence the order impugned merits same treatment. The counsel further contended that the reason cited for revocation of NOC is law and order situation and the security, but nothing cogent was shared with the petitioner to the effect.

Advocate General ICT submitted that respondents are willing to allow the petitioner to hold the rally after “Chehlum” of Hazrat Imam Hussain (RA) due to security concerns and law and order situation.

The bench observed in its written order that the petitioner is a political party and is interested to hold rally in ICT and is aggrieved of revocation of NOC by respondent No2 through the impugned order.

It added that the reason cited in the impugned order for revocation of NOC is law and order situation due to the month of Muharram, however, “it is pertinent to observe that no prior intimation was made to the petitioner or any of its office bearers before revocation of NOC.”

The IHC bench continued that this court already has dealt with the similar question in somewhat similar circumstances vide order dated 27.03.2024 in case titled Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf through Aamer Masood Mughal (President, Islamabad Region) Vs Federation of Pakistan etc.

It concluded, “In view of referred position of law and facts, the impugned order dated 05.07.2024 is set aside. Since the date of NOC for holding the rally has passed, application for grant of NOC by the petitioner shall be deemed to be pending and decided in accordance with the observations made here in above and the relevant law.”

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.