AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

EDITORIAL: Whatever the nuts and bolts of the Second Amendment Bill to the Election Act 2024 – it does not matter – the gist is that the government is not going to waste any time in doing whatever it can to resist the Supreme Court’s July 12 ruling about reserved seats that made PTI the largest party in the house.

Some wondered what PML-N would pull out of the hat once its review petition was put off till after the court’s annual vacations and its decision to ban PTI did not sit too well with its own coalition partners.

And this is clearly the answer; introduction of a bill by a private member to legislate an amendment in the election laws that would undo the effect of the Supreme Court judgement.

The government claims the amendment seeks to plug a loophole in the constitution by not allowing independent candidates to join parties “after the stipulated time” and preventing parties from getting reserved seats if they don’t submit their lists “in time”, etc., ought to answer one very important question.

What about the popular vote?

It is also noteworthy that the proposed amendment has a declaration that the provisions of the amendment would take precedence over court orders, including the Supreme Court’s. What the government considers necessary legislation is being seen by many as blatantly lighting the fuse on the powder keg that the deepening executive-judiciary cleavage has become.

There is no ambiguity about the function and power of the legislature to frame laws but equally unambiguous is the function and power of the judiciary to interpret the laws enacted by the legislature. Such is the scheme of the constitution under the principle of separation of powers.

There is little doubt that if an amendment in law is enacted to nullify the judgement of the apex court, it would be challenged and struck down. There is, therefore, an urgent need for all parties, especially the executive that includes the establishment, to step back and reassess this situation.

The SC judgement was supposed to be the end of this matter, yet we’re farther from settling the dust from the Feb 8 election than at any point since. In fact, the stakes have consistently risen and now another confrontation between two premier state institutions is inevitable just when political instability is the last thing the country needs as it desperately negotiates a bailout programme and tries to lure foreign investment.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

KU Aug 03, 2024 01:31pm
These crooked tactics for rule are quite familiar in annals of world history, n so is the similar fate of countries that are no more. Democracy is now 'by the Raj n for the Raj', people don't count.
thumb_up Recommended (0)