AIRLINK 180.49 Decreased By ▼ -2.22 (-1.22%)
BOP 10.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-3.44%)
CNERGY 8.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.47%)
CPHL 93.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.61 (-0.65%)
FCCL 46.40 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.26%)
FFL 16.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.99%)
FLYNG 28.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.11%)
HUBC 143.99 Decreased By ▼ -1.79 (-1.23%)
HUMNL 13.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.23%)
KEL 4.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.91%)
KOSM 6.03 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (4.15%)
MLCF 67.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.15%)
OGDC 213.79 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (0.24%)
PACE 6.08 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PAEL 46.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.74 (-3.64%)
PIAHCLA 17.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.35%)
PIBTL 9.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.6%)
POWER 14.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.56%)
PPL 169.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-0.39%)
PRL 33.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-1.47%)
PTC 21.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-1.84%)
SEARL 94.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.74 (-0.78%)
SSGC 41.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-1.97%)
SYM 15.83 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.41%)
TELE 7.73 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.48%)
TPLP 10.02 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.3%)
TRG 67.19 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.45%)
WAVESAPP 9.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.62%)
WTL 1.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.74%)
YOUW 3.88 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.31%)
AIRLINK 180.49 Decreased By ▼ -2.22 (-1.22%)
BOP 10.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-3.44%)
CNERGY 8.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.47%)
CPHL 93.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.61 (-0.65%)
FCCL 46.40 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.26%)
FFL 16.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.99%)
FLYNG 28.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.11%)
HUBC 143.99 Decreased By ▼ -1.79 (-1.23%)
HUMNL 13.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.23%)
KEL 4.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.91%)
KOSM 6.03 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (4.15%)
MLCF 67.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.15%)
OGDC 213.79 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (0.24%)
PACE 6.08 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PAEL 46.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.74 (-3.64%)
PIAHCLA 17.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.35%)
PIBTL 9.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.6%)
POWER 14.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.56%)
PPL 169.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-0.39%)
PRL 33.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-1.47%)
PTC 21.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-1.84%)
SEARL 94.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.74 (-0.78%)
SSGC 41.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-1.97%)
SYM 15.83 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.41%)
TELE 7.73 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.48%)
TPLP 10.02 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.3%)
TRG 67.19 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.45%)
WAVESAPP 9.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.62%)
WTL 1.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.74%)
YOUW 3.88 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.31%)
BR100 12,615 Decreased By -60.8 (-0.48%)
BR30 37,890 Decreased By -249.1 (-0.65%)
KSE100 117,873 Decreased By -557.3 (-0.47%)
KSE30 36,246 Decreased By -157.5 (-0.43%)

LAHORE: The Lahore Tax Office (LTO) failed to deduct tax on transfer from construction work in progress (CWIP) to fixed assets, as no payment was made, said sources.

According to details, the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals -l) had deleted the demand regarding non-deduction of tax levied under the heading of transfer from CWIP to fixed assets against a chemical firm.

However, the concerned Commissioner termed it unjustified and argued that the default surcharge is a mandatory levy and hence cannot be deleted and to be imposed in a scenario where tax was not deducted as per law. He further maintained that the previously passed order is bad in law and against the facts of the case, as the taxpayer was rightly charged with the tax as the taxpayer failed to furnish supporting evidence of the declared results before the Assessing Officer.

However, the taxpayer company provided the appellate forum with a letter and stated that reply with evidence was duly made to the assessing officer through the said letter. Without taking into consideration the reply made the tax was levied on the taxpayer, it maintained. Additionally, copy of ledgers, income tax return and accounts financial statement were also submitted by the company.

The appellate tribunal held that for the issue of deletion of the tax amount arising from transfer of CWIP to fixed assets, the department rightfully deleted the charge as the transfer from CWIP to fixed assets was made without any payment, henceforth, no deduction is necessary.

It was further held that on the issues of tax deletion under the heads of packing material, consumed stores & spare and advances to supplier, the produced copies of the ledger by the taxpayer company indicates that wherever tax was applicable was duly deducted and deposited.

In addition thereto, the ATIR held that the produced copy of the income tax return reflects that there was a substantial amount of refund, due to which default surcharge cannot be levied. Therefore, the departmental Appeal was rejected by the appellate tribunal.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.