AGL 40.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.4%)
AIRLINK 129.53 Decreased By ▼ -2.20 (-1.67%)
BOP 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
CNERGY 4.63 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.58%)
DCL 8.94 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.36%)
DFML 41.69 Increased By ▲ 1.08 (2.66%)
DGKC 83.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.37%)
FCCL 32.77 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.33%)
FFBL 75.47 Increased By ▲ 6.86 (10%)
FFL 11.47 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.06%)
HUBC 110.55 Decreased By ▼ -1.21 (-1.08%)
HUMNL 14.56 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.75%)
KEL 5.39 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.26%)
KOSM 8.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-6.46%)
MLCF 39.79 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.91%)
NBP 60.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
OGDC 199.66 Increased By ▲ 4.72 (2.42%)
PAEL 26.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.15%)
PIBTL 7.66 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.41%)
PPL 157.92 Increased By ▲ 2.15 (1.38%)
PRL 26.73 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
PTC 18.46 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.87%)
SEARL 82.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-0.7%)
TELE 8.31 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 34.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.12%)
TPLP 9.06 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.84%)
TREET 17.47 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (4.61%)
TRG 61.32 Decreased By ▼ -1.13 (-1.81%)
UNITY 27.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.04%)
WTL 1.38 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (7.81%)
BR100 10,407 Increased By 220 (2.16%)
BR30 31,713 Increased By 377.1 (1.2%)
KSE100 97,328 Increased By 1781.9 (1.86%)
KSE30 30,192 Increased By 614.4 (2.08%)

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s BRT systems showed high levels of satisfaction, but highlighted the lack of effective transport to reach the BRT systems, says the Asian Development Bank (ADB).

The bank in its latest report, “CAREC Road Safety Engineering Manual, why and how to manage speed”, stated that Pakistan has adopted multiple BRT systems in major cities since the first BRT installation in Lahore in 2013. Research has found satisfaction and efficacy for the systems in Lahore, Multan, and Rawalpindi-Islamabad.

Analyses highlighted lessons to be learned from the PRC’s and Pakistan’s BRT systems. The PRC’s BRT systems often include high quality services to increase use; Pakistan’s BRT systems show high levels of satisfaction with the BRT itself, but highlight the lack of effective transport to reach the BRT systems, it added.

The report further stated that in Pakistan, population density, development volume, and land use for economic activities all increased after the BRT systems were operating; they could be further improved by addressing transit, walking, and security issues for women. Ridership could also be improved if lane design allowed for faster movement of BRT than other traffic with more dedicated lanes for BRT overtaking.

Selective development of BRTs where demand is high would allow for fares to cover more of the operating costs, while station spacing can be increased to improve BRT speed and reliability, though this must be balanced with acceptable walking distances for users.

The report also noted that a study of factors in crash severity on motorways in Pakistan identified speed as a critical factor.

Managing speed is one of the most powerful and cost-effective ways to achieve road safety. It has the potential to reduce crash frequency and severity, as well as to deliver many other direct economic and social benefits. Despite this, the practice of speed management remains underestimated, poorly understood, and inadequately addressed around the world.

This manual works toward correcting this by perusing evidence on the benefits of safe speed. While the manual does not suggest lowering speeds to a point restricting mobility, lowering speeds from extremely high levels to lower but still high levels is ultimately not enough. This manual instead promotes working toward “safe system” speeds. This manual provides a summary of evidence to guide improved speed management across multiple areas of opportunity in Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC) countries.

A selection of specific speed management interventions are canvased and prioritized. A business case for speed management is presented. The manual also addresses common misunderstandings and prevalent misinformation to guide communications with the public and informal discussions with decision-makers, partners, and stakeholders.

The costly impacts of speed can be effectively managed by adopting evidence-based interventions to deliver safe speeds. Interventions that reduce speed are a cost-effective opportunity for CAREC countries to dramatically reduce crash deaths and injuries within a reasonable time frame. Speed-managing interventions are highly cost effective, with some returning $17 in savings for every $1 invested.

CAREC governments will find it challenging to find investments with stronger returns than these. Reducing travel speeds by just 10 km/h across all roads in the CAREC region would result in a reduction in the number of crash deaths to less than half current levels and deliver additional economic benefits.

A broad adoption of multiple powerful speed reducing interventions is critical for road safety and for other social and economic benefits.

The business case is compelling for CAREC member countries to adopt speeds that protect pedestrians and other vulnerable road users, and to move beyond the misinformation that has constrained speed management policy all over the world, the report noted.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.