AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of Pakistan has upheld the Competition Appellate Tribunal’s (CAT) order imposing a penalty of Rs 6 million on a local restaurant chain for deceiving consumers by fraudulently using “STARBUCKS” branding for selling its coffee.

STARBUCKS, a globally recognised chain of coffeehouses registered in the State of Washington, filed a formal complaint that the Lahore-based restaurant, Options International, was selling “Starbucks Coffee” while fraudulently using “STARBUCKS MARKS” in its branding.

The Supreme Court ruled that the appellant, “Options International,” put itself forward by selling its products under the international brand name Starbucks and by using its logo, which must have had the effect of distorting competition within Pakistan because a local vendor selling similar products, as those being sold by the appellant, would be at a serious disadvantage and not be able to compete therewith since the understanding public would believe, understand, or perceive the same to be the genuine products of Starbucks.

The CCP’s enquiry concluded that Options International had prima facie deceived its consumers and harmed the business Interests of their competitor by disseminating false and misleading information. During the enquiry, Options admitted to the violation. In its order, CCP’s bench noted that although Options had stopped using STARBUCKS MARKS and committed to complying with the Commission’s directions, the unauthorized use of STARBUCKS MARKS spanned a substantial period.

The CCP bench, besides baring M/s Options International from using STARBUCKS MARKS, imposed a penalty of PKR 5 million on M/s Options International. Additionally, the bench directed Options International to inform the general public through newspaper advertisements for three consecutive days about its fraudulent use of STARBUCKS MARKS.

Options International filed an appeal against the CCP’s order before CAT, which dismissed the appeal and increased the penalty amount from PKR 5 million to PKR 6 million and modified the daily penalty. Subsequently, M/s Options International has filed an appeal to the Supreme Court of Pakistan against the CAT’s order, which the court dismissed.

Using distorted or misleading information and trademarks for marketing of products violate competition laws as it can influences consumer decisions and may prevent them from considering alternative products. The CCP is committed to safeguarding consumers and businesses from deceptive marketing practices through spreading awareness and strict enforcement of competition laws.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.