AGL 38.84 Increased By ▲ 3.53 (10%)
AIRLINK 136.75 Decreased By ▼ -1.64 (-1.19%)
BOP 5.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.57%)
CNERGY 4.13 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.49%)
DCL 9.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.63%)
DFML 51.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-1.55%)
DGKC 81.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-0.81%)
FCCL 23.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.34%)
FFBL 45.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.66%)
FFL 9.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.47%)
HUBC 149.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.68 (-0.45%)
HUMNL 10.92 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.68%)
KEL 4.09 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.74%)
KOSM 9.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-2.71%)
MLCF 33.24 Decreased By ▼ -1.11 (-3.23%)
NBP 59.80 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (1.05%)
OGDC 137.25 Increased By ▲ 1.55 (1.14%)
PAEL 26.86 Increased By ▲ 1.16 (4.51%)
PIBTL 6.01 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.5%)
PPL 112.80 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (0.45%)
PRL 24.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.37%)
PTC 11.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.5%)
SEARL 57.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-0.78%)
TELE 7.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.92%)
TOMCL 41.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.12%)
TPLP 8.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.83%)
TREET 15.12 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.07%)
TRG 51.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.52 (-0.99%)
UNITY 29.18 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (1.85%)
WTL 1.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.6%)
BR100 8,311 Decreased By -53.3 (-0.64%)
BR30 26,914 Decreased By -1 (-0%)
KSE100 78,652 Decreased By -634.9 (-0.8%)
KSE30 24,817 Decreased By -256.3 (-1.02%)

LAHORE: A tyre importer has secured duty after proving that the customs department has assessed the goods in terms of valuation rulings which have already been declared illegal, unlawful and against the Customs Act, said sources.

According to details, the tyre importer had imported tyres of various sizes and filed Goods Declaration (GD) on the basis of the import documents. The assessing officer assessed it under the valuation ruling, which was already declared illegal by a customs tribunal.

The importer challenged the assessment on the ground that the department has assessed the goods in terms valuation rulings which have already been declared illegal, unlawful and against section 25 of the Customs Act.

He added that the said order of the tribunal was still in the field, therefore, binding on the department because it was for general application, and not person- specific. He further maintained that the department cannot pass the assessment in a stereotype manner without giving any valid and lawful reason and evidence.

He also highlighted the discriminatory treatment was extended to by the department in his case since he was denied of obtaining the benefit of the order of the tribunal on the fact that he was a party in the case.

However, the department denied the benefit on the plea that the said order was not for general application but person specific. Since the importer was not part to the case at the relevant time, therefore, he was not eligible to the benefit of the order passed by the tribunal.

But the relevant forum declared that the tribunal while setting aside the valuation ruling had set forth a principle that the valuation rulings in question contained patent illegalities therefore were set aside in general.

Once it was set aside and declared illegal the valuation ruling was to be deemed as ‘not in field’ for everyone importing that category of goods. The forum further maintained that assessment of goods on the basis of the declared transactional values of other importers tantamount to discrimination against the importer by the Customs Collectorate.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

SZS Aug 18, 2024 08:20am
So what was the follow-up if any? Was the complainant compensated ? if not when and how? Incomplete stores!
thumb_up Recommended (0)