AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

ISLAMABAD: The K-Electric has proposed amendments to the Consumer Service Manual (CSM) to safeguard the protected domestic consumers from occasional excess from the 200 units per month limit and avoid misuse of temporary disconnection clause due to recent rebasing of tariff, well-informed sources told Business Recorder.

The power utility company has submitted these recommendations after a thorough review of a decision of NEPRA with respect to rebasing of consumer-end tariff, effective from July 1, 2024 and CSM issued by the Regulator on January 31, 2021.

Currently, the Government is facing a challenging situation and delivering a rebased consumer tariff which prioritizes industrial consumers to boost industrial growth across the country while protecting the most vulnerable segments of society.

Consumers’ recommendation, Discos, KE tariff: PD submits addendum to Nepra

KE is expecting that the introduction of fixed charges closely aligns it with the tariff structure applicable in regional countries, hoping this will help in achieving financial stability of the sector.

In this regard, KE has submitted few recommendations to the Power Division with respect to different categories of consumers which are as follows:

i) Protected consumers’ status: The current tariff regime applies lower rates to protected consumers, defined as those who consistently use less than 200 units per month for six consecutive months, typically belonging to the low-income segment.

However, if these consumer exceed 200 units in any given month, their protected status is temporarily revoked, and they are charged higher, unprotected consumer rates for the following six months.

For instance, if a protected consumer loses his protected status and consumes 201 units in a month, followed by 200 units each month for the next six months until its protected status is reinstated, the consumer incurs an additional cost of approximately Rs 20,000 due to the higher tariff rates, thereby significantly burdening the end consumer.

Considering this matter and to alleviate the burden on these consumers, if they exceed 200 units in one month (but remain below 200 units in the next month), KE has suggested that their protected status should be reinstated from the next month onwards, rather than subjecting them to higher tariffs for the next six consecutive months, thus allowing them a one month exception in six months period.

This adjustment is aimed at sustaining the affordability and accessibility of electricity tariffs by ensuring that residential consumers are not duly burdened by penalties for occasional excess consumption, thereby allowing them continued access to essential electricity services at reasonable rates, promoting economic stability and social welfare.

Moreover, considering that recovery is also a critical element with respect to the overall sector sustainability, therefore, additional incentives should be introduced for consumers with continued good paying behaviour.

ii) Timely issuance of tariff decisions: Sharing views on issuance of tariff decisions, KE has suggested initiating its billing process by fifth of each calendar month. In this regard, the power utility company has requested Power Division to issue all decisions relating to consumer tariff including Fuel Charge Adjustment (FCA), applicable for the same month, before the start of the billing process, taking into account the time required for notification of SRO, as any impact of changes to the consumer tariff in pursuance of Authority’s decisions after the start of billing, is passed on to the consumers in the next billing cycle as arrears, potentially overburdening them and leading to late recovery.

iii) Opportunity of misuse of the temporary disconnection clause of CSM: Commenting on opportunity of misuse of the temporary disconnection clause of Consumer Service Manual (CSM), the power utility company has explained that as per clause 8.3.2 of the existing CSM, consumers may opt for temporary disconnection of supply for a maximum period of eleven months and are exempted from payment of actual notified minimum/fixed charges during the period of temporary disconnection.

Moreover, as per the reconnection policy under clause 8.5.2 of the CSM, consumers are exempt from payment of minimum/fixed charges for the first ninety days and thereafter are required to pay minimum charges/fixed charges for one month out of a quarter only.

The KE argues that by virtue of the above clauses, consumers have an opportunity to avoid paying monthly minimum/fixed charges determined by the Authority/GoP resulting in under recovery of fixed charges which will ultimately burden other consumers.

KE has proposed an amendment to the clause that there should be no exemption from fixed/minimum charges to ensure that consumers do not use the provision to avoid minimum/fixed charges.

The KE has sought comprehensive overhaul of the tariff structure, which has already been initiated by the Power Division, to unlock the country’s full potential and provide sustainable economic and social upliftment and growth for years to come and to create a more balanced and beneficial environment for consumers in the long run, ensuring fair distribution of costs and enhancing efficiency and growth in the energy sector.

KE maintains that the proposed recommendations would aid in the achievement of these objectives, requesting Power Division to issue necessary guidelines to the Nepra.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

Altaf Aug 18, 2024 07:22am
One of the worst institute which destroy Pakistan economy and create problems for citizens, how they charged FAC of previous year in current month, are they not capable of calculate cost of current.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Sabih Aug 18, 2024 11:51am
Every rule goes against helpless consumer,who pays the unlawful charges and plenty of taxes,in fact the lower middle classes and middle class Electricity charges more than house rent due to taxes.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Agha Raza Aug 18, 2024 02:43pm
IT IS A GOOD NEWS FOR PROTACTED CUSTOMERS.I ALSO FACED THE SAME SITUATION IN PAST WHEN K.E MADE READING ON 32ND DAY RATHER THAN 30TH AND COUNT 206 UNITS AND MADE ME VICTIMIZED FOR NEXT SIX MONTHS.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
saif Aug 18, 2024 07:14pm
nepra is one of the worsr department in pakistan which is not protecting the consumers..up to 200 units usage in one month thn 6 months punishment is out of sense..so think about it
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Tauseef Ahmed Jilani Aug 18, 2024 11:24pm
What is protected and UN protected is any country follow this miserable policy Or only we ignorant fools
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Mustafa Malik Aug 18, 2024 11:58pm
If consumer use the electricity in one month above 200 unit.He will wait for 6months. To come back in protective consumer.the new fix charges impose.please safe consumer by NEPRA and power division.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Tafheem Alam Aug 19, 2024 01:21am
Only Pakistan has these types of ridiculous policies. What is protected/non protested, slab based rates? The should be a flat rate for everyone. Even companies give releif for more usage consumption.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
M.Q.Siddiqui Aug 19, 2024 10:10am
Protected & Unprotected terms use for electricity user in Pakistan. KE is monopolist for Karachi users of electricity. NEPRA fully protected KE for their policies of killing Pakistan.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
M.Q.Siddiqui Aug 19, 2024 11:35am
Free from KE to Karachi allow every energy suppliers domestic & Foreigner's for electricity consumptions. KE is so-called monopolist for Karachi & allied areas.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Huzaifa Ahmed Aug 19, 2024 03:05pm
Kindly at least gives relief to us who have bill under 300 or 270 units because of that we are middle class people who don't have air condition at thier homes . Thank you
thumb_up Recommended (0)
owais Aug 19, 2024 06:51pm
in any where in world there is no tariff based on protected or non protected catagory. Fed govt nepra minisitry all are incompetent have no professional skills to manage tariff.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Ammar Aug 20, 2024 02:20am
@Tafheem Alam, many people cannot even afford a fan at 30-70 Rs /unit, to be able to avoid a heatstroke, they need subsidy. Just need to separate them from rich people with net metering through AIM.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Anwer Naqvi Aug 20, 2024 05:43am
Uniform rates should be charged from all consumers whether they use less than 200 units or more. All subsidies must be removed because it is the greatest fraud.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Umair Aug 21, 2024 09:06am
Good News for protecred users.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Umair Aug 21, 2024 09:06am
Bettwr news in cirrent situation. KE purposal is highlh appreciated
thumb_up Recommended (0)