AGL 35.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.84%)
AIRLINK 130.80 Decreased By ▼ -2.70 (-2.02%)
BOP 5.03 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.21%)
CNERGY 3.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.24%)
DCL 8.50 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.95%)
DFML 47.58 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.38%)
DGKC 74.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.2%)
FCCL 24.64 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (1.61%)
FFBL 48.30 Increased By ▲ 2.30 (5%)
FFL 9.00 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.78%)
HUBC 147.50 Decreased By ▼ -6.60 (-4.28%)
HUMNL 10.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.27%)
KEL 4.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.74%)
KOSM 8.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-6.31%)
MLCF 33.00 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.76%)
NBP 57.90 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.17%)
OGDC 143.52 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (0.5%)
PAEL 26.10 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.35%)
PIBTL 5.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.52%)
PPL 116.30 Increased By ▲ 1.70 (1.48%)
PRL 24.25 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.41%)
PTC 11.52 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.44%)
SEARL 58.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 7.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.78%)
TOMCL 41.27 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.32%)
TPLP 8.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-3%)
TREET 15.37 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (1.92%)
TRG 58.45 Decreased By ▼ -1.45 (-2.42%)
UNITY 28.31 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.11%)
WTL 1.35 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 8,561 Increased By 101.7 (1.2%)
BR30 27,080 Decreased By -187.9 (-0.69%)
KSE100 81,937 Increased By 1476.1 (1.83%)
KSE30 25,925 Increased By 457.3 (1.8%)

LAHORE: The Punjab University (PU) on Monday assured the Lahore High Court that roll number slip will be issued to petitioner a Baloch student Sadia for LLB examinations.

The court sought replies from the respondents within a week as the petitioner’s counsel wanted to proceed further.

The court was hearing a petition of Sadia Baloch who challenged a notification suspending her from the university’s rolls after declaring her a miscreant student.

Earlier, the court asked the PU counsel to seek instructions on matter today.

The university’s counsel later returned to the court and presented another notification and assured the court that the petitioner shall be issued her roll number slip. He also assured the court to hold the proceedings before a discipline committee.

The court at this asked the petitioner’s counsel if he would like to press your petition further. The petitioner’s counsel responded in affirmation urging the court that the petitioner had challenged the powers exercised by the vice chancellor and other respondents against her. He said the subsequent notification presented by the university’s counsel did not annul the original notification.

The court at this directed the PU authorities to issue roll number slip to the petitioner without further delay and sought replies from the respondents.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.