AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

LAHORE: An Additional District & Sessions Judge Lahore has held that an application under section 22-A of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction in a matter of wrong posting of the NTN Number in Sales Tax Return is not maintainable nor the Sessions Court has jurisdiction to pass any direction in this regard.

The court gave this ruling while dismissing an application under section 22-A CrPC moved by a citizen Zafar Iqbal Bhatti. The court observed that the petition was devoid of jurisdiction and maintainability.

The petitioner Zafar visited his Tax Expert on 27.07.24 for submission of his income tax return for the period 2023-24 and found that one Dr Riaz had posted/processed five transactions against his NTN number of valuing Rs1913315.00 for which FBR demanded sales tax from him whereas he neither dealt in medicine nor met any representative of said company and even did not visit Ferozpur road, Lahore.

He submitted that the respondent company had committed fraud with him by preparing fake documents and showing fake entries against his NTN number. His counsel Nadeem Haider contended that the respondent had committed fraud with his client however, representing the respondent company advocate Jalilur Rehman argued that it was a case of unintentional error or omission in posting the NTN number for which a revision had already been submitted to the FBR Department for correction of the NTN number. He further contended that the petition was not maintainable and prayed to dismiss the same.

The court while agreeing with the contentions of the counsel of the respondent company Jalilur Rehman dismissed the petition.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.