AIRLINK 200.29 Increased By ▲ 2.74 (1.39%)
BOP 10.49 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.14%)
CNERGY 7.21 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.74%)
FCCL 34.94 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (1.51%)
FFL 17.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.36%)
FLYNG 24.85 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.02%)
HUBC 127.81 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.06%)
HUMNL 13.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.14%)
KEL 5.00 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.46%)
KOSM 7.03 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (5.08%)
MLCF 44.62 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (1.06%)
OGDC 222.15 Decreased By ▼ -2.76 (-1.23%)
PACE 7.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.07%)
PAEL 42.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.14%)
PIAHCLA 17.39 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.99%)
PIBTL 8.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.35%)
POWER 9.15 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.33%)
PPL 192.73 Decreased By ▼ -1.57 (-0.81%)
PRL 41.50 Increased By ▲ 2.74 (7.07%)
PTC 24.44 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.41%)
SEARL 101.27 Increased By ▲ 1.40 (1.4%)
SILK 1.05 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (5%)
SSGC 43.87 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.25%)
SYM 18.76 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.97%)
TELE 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (4.61%)
TPLP 13.08 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.93%)
TRG 66.19 Increased By ▲ 2.09 (3.26%)
WAVESAPP 10.53 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.54%)
WTL 1.78 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 4.04 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.5%)
BR100 12,038 Decreased By -1.1 (-0.01%)
BR30 36,725 Increased By 36.1 (0.1%)
KSE100 115,361 Increased By 556.5 (0.48%)
KSE30 36,303 Increased By 200.8 (0.56%)

The oil production of Pakistan witnessed an uptick of 1.4 percent year-on-year in FY24. Meanwhile, gas production depicted a 4.4 percent year-on-year decrease. For Pakistan Oilfields Limited, oil and gas production fell during FY24 by 6 and 5 percent year-on-year respectively.

However, the company reported a growth in profitability and dividends, despite a decline in oil and gas production. For FY24, POL’s revenue growth stood at 7 percent year-on-year, which was primarily driven by the depreciation of the Pakistani rupee, offset the impact of declining oil and gas production.

The company’s bottomline also showed a growth of around 7 percent year-on-year to Rs39 billion for FY24. And one of factors behind earnings growth besides topline rise was a sharp reduction in exploration costs. The company’s exploration expenses fell by a remarkable 76 percent year-on-year, mainly attributed to the absence of dry wells during the year, which had contributed heavily to the previous year’s expenses.

Operating expenses, however, saw a 9 percent year-on-year increase, driven by higher costs associated with the company’s ongoing operations. Despite the rise in operational expenses, POL witnessed a growth in gross margins.

The company’s other income for FY24 declined by 39 percent year-on-year primarily due to the absence of foreign exchange gains that had bolstered earnings in the previous year. However, in the fourth quarter of FY24, other income rose by 21 percent year-on-year reflecting higher returns on the company’s cash and investment balances.

Despite the decline in oil and gas production, POL maintained solid operational performance. The drop in production was primarily a result of natural reserve depletion. The exploration activities were scaled back, resulting in lower geological and geophysical costs. Looking ahead, POL faces challenges due to its reliance on a limited number of non-operated blocks, which are depleting rapidly. The company’s exploration and development efforts have been relatively passive. However, POL continues to offer a robust dividend yield, making it an attractive option for income-focused investors.

Comments

200 characters