AIRLINK 196.15 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (1.34%)
BOP 10.17 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.21%)
CNERGY 7.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.63%)
FCCL 39.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-1.85%)
FFL 17.04 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.07%)
FLYNG 27.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-2.02%)
HUBC 133.93 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (1.02%)
HUMNL 13.99 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.72%)
KEL 4.71 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (2.39%)
KOSM 6.66 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.6%)
MLCF 47.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-1.07%)
OGDC 215.05 Increased By ▲ 1.14 (0.53%)
PACE 6.96 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.43%)
PAEL 41.95 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (1.72%)
PIAHCLA 17.19 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.23%)
PIBTL 8.53 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.43%)
POWER 9.69 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.52%)
PPL 183.90 Increased By ▲ 1.55 (0.85%)
PRL 42.85 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (2.12%)
PTC 25.11 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.84%)
SEARL 110.70 Increased By ▲ 3.86 (3.61%)
SILK 1.00 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (1.01%)
SSGC 44.11 Increased By ▲ 4.01 (10%)
SYM 17.76 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (1.66%)
TELE 8.99 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.7%)
TPLP 13.01 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (2.04%)
TRG 67.45 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (0.75%)
WAVESAPP 11.70 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (3.27%)
WTL 1.82 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (1.68%)
YOUW 4.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.72%)
BR100 12,224 Increased By 179.4 (1.49%)
BR30 36,907 Increased By 326.4 (0.89%)
KSE100 115,472 Increased By 1433.8 (1.26%)
KSE30 36,318 Increased By 523.7 (1.46%)

The oil production of Pakistan witnessed an uptick of 1.4 percent year-on-year in FY24. Meanwhile, gas production depicted a 4.4 percent year-on-year decrease. For Pakistan Oilfields Limited, oil and gas production fell during FY24 by 6 and 5 percent year-on-year respectively.

However, the company reported a growth in profitability and dividends, despite a decline in oil and gas production. For FY24, POL’s revenue growth stood at 7 percent year-on-year, which was primarily driven by the depreciation of the Pakistani rupee, offset the impact of declining oil and gas production.

The company’s bottomline also showed a growth of around 7 percent year-on-year to Rs39 billion for FY24. And one of factors behind earnings growth besides topline rise was a sharp reduction in exploration costs. The company’s exploration expenses fell by a remarkable 76 percent year-on-year, mainly attributed to the absence of dry wells during the year, which had contributed heavily to the previous year’s expenses.

Operating expenses, however, saw a 9 percent year-on-year increase, driven by higher costs associated with the company’s ongoing operations. Despite the rise in operational expenses, POL witnessed a growth in gross margins.

The company’s other income for FY24 declined by 39 percent year-on-year primarily due to the absence of foreign exchange gains that had bolstered earnings in the previous year. However, in the fourth quarter of FY24, other income rose by 21 percent year-on-year reflecting higher returns on the company’s cash and investment balances.

Despite the decline in oil and gas production, POL maintained solid operational performance. The drop in production was primarily a result of natural reserve depletion. The exploration activities were scaled back, resulting in lower geological and geophysical costs. Looking ahead, POL faces challenges due to its reliance on a limited number of non-operated blocks, which are depleting rapidly. The company’s exploration and development efforts have been relatively passive. However, POL continues to offer a robust dividend yield, making it an attractive option for income-focused investors.

Comments

200 characters