AIRLINK 197.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-0.23%)
BOP 9.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.9%)
CNERGY 7.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.41%)
FCCL 36.67 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (1.86%)
FFL 16.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.01%)
FLYNG 26.20 Increased By ▲ 1.16 (4.63%)
HUBC 135.12 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (0.81%)
HUMNL 14.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.71%)
KEL 4.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.84%)
KOSM 6.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.73%)
MLCF 45.65 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (1.49%)
OGDC 216.97 Decreased By ▼ -1.26 (-0.58%)
PACE 6.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.14%)
PAEL 40.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-1.28%)
PIAHCLA 17.02 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.95%)
PIBTL 8.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.3%)
POWER 9.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.96%)
PPL 184.70 Decreased By ▼ -1.23 (-0.66%)
PRL 41.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.15%)
PTC 24.89 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.48%)
SEARL 103.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.85 (-0.81%)
SILK 1.02 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.99%)
SSGC 40.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.64%)
SYM 17.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.16%)
TELE 8.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.8%)
TPLP 12.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.79%)
TRG 66.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.3%)
WAVESAPP 11.30 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
WTL 1.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-1.69%)
YOUW 3.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.25%)
BR100 12,098 Decreased By -10.9 (-0.09%)
BR30 36,576 Decreased By -22.1 (-0.06%)
KSE100 114,722 Decreased By -320.1 (-0.28%)
KSE30 36,089 Decreased By -110.9 (-0.31%)

This is apropos a letter to the Editor titled ‘Xinjiang, Balochistan and FATA’ to the Editor carried by this newspaper yesterday.

In my view, to counter the Baloch insurgency and integrate the Baloch people into the national mainstream, the government only had to adopt a holistic approach to address the root causes of the conflict, including economic marginalization, political exclusion, and cultural grievances by investing in local development, ensuring fair resource distribution, and enhancing political representation while granting greater administrative autonomy to Balochistan.

On the contrary, the government response to deal with insurgency in Balochistan is normally perceived exactly the opposite.

The propaganda war has inculcated the impression albeit without any conclusive evidence that the response of Pakistan’s government included military operations, targeted killings, enforced disappearances.

The media is rife with reports that tens of thousands of people, including insurgents, civilians, and security personnel, have been killed in the ongoing conflict making this conflict as one of Pakistan’s deadliest.

Similarly the response of the Government to erstwhile FATA is perceived primarily kinetic. Reportedly, the Pakistani government has conducted numerous military operations (e.g., Operation Zarb-e-Azb) to dismantle militant networks. The insurgency and counter-insurgency operations have led to tens of thousands of deaths, including militants, security forces, and civilians.

Displacement and destruction of infrastructure have also been significant. Contrastingly, in Xinjiang, the Chinese government primarily pursued the policy of development which worked like magic.

The region has purposefully made a lynchpin of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). During the 13th Five-Year Plan period (2016-2020), China invested over $100 billion in Xinjiang’s development.

The substantial investment has also been made in infrastructure, industry, IT, and modern agriculture, as part of its broader strategy to integrate the region more closely with the rest of the country and to address the underlying economic disparities that contribute to unrest.

Qamar Bashir

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.