AIRLINK 198.49 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (0.26%)
BOP 10.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.4%)
CNERGY 7.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.27%)
FCCL 36.36 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (1%)
FFL 16.96 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.3%)
FLYNG 25.30 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.04%)
HUBC 134.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.02%)
HUMNL 14.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.21%)
KEL 4.78 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 6.94 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 45.00 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.04%)
OGDC 217.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-0.15%)
PACE 6.97 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.43%)
PAEL 41.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.75%)
PIAHCLA 16.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.06%)
PIBTL 8.51 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.59%)
POWER 9.41 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.21%)
PPL 185.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-0.5%)
PRL 41.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.65%)
PTC 24.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.69%)
SEARL 104.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-0.62%)
SILK 1.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.94%)
SSGC 40.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.27%)
SYM 18.05 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.11%)
TPLP 12.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.93%)
TRG 66.99 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (0.59%)
WAVESAPP 11.50 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (1.77%)
WTL 1.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.56%)
YOUW 4.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.25%)
BR100 12,109 No Change 0 (0%)
BR30 36,598 No Change 0 (0%)
KSE100 115,006 Decreased By -36.3 (-0.03%)
KSE30 36,147 Decreased By -52.2 (-0.14%)

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has rejected an order passed by the Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) and ruled that refund cannot be blocked due to pendency of any tax reference before the high court.

It is reliably learnt that a landmark order has been passed by IHC and ruled that merely because the petitioner chose to avail a remedy before the FTO who has stayed his hand for the time being doesn’t mean that the tax department has carte blanche to refuse to comply with the order of the Tribunal.

IHC order stated, “Contention that because a tax reference has been pending against the refund order passed by the Tribunal, wherein no injunctive order has been issued, a refund has not been processed.

FTO orders’ implementation: IHC issues show cause notice to CIR for filing false statements

He has failed to adduce any provision of law or any case law, which establishes that the filing of a reference creating sufficient cause for the tax department to defy an order of the Tribunal which is in the field. Grievance emanates from the order of the FTO, who chose not to proceed further on grounds of maladministration pursuant to order given that the matter was subjudice. This is also insufficient basis for the question of maintainability of the petition.

The Tribunal’s order directed the tax authorities to process a refund that is in the field and has not been complied with. Merely because the petitioner chose to avail a remedy before the FTO who has stayed his hand for the time being doesn’t mean that the tax department has carte blanche to refuse to comply with the order of the Tribunal, IHC order added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

T Sep 09, 2024 09:14am
fto, fbr and the courts all wandering clueless on modern rules of business, no wonder pakistan looks like a lost buffalo in arbitrations.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Faiz Jalib Sep 09, 2024 11:43am
Every official: My is the law of the land. "Too many applications hence the delay". Instead of honouring their commitments and working towards halal rozi, they come up with the flimsiest of excuses
thumb_up Recommended (0)