AGL 38.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.16%)
AIRLINK 219.00 Increased By ▲ 11.23 (5.41%)
BOP 10.45 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (3.88%)
CNERGY 7.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.56%)
DCL 10.02 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.3%)
DFML 41.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.34%)
DGKC 104.52 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (1.02%)
FCCL 36.66 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.85%)
FFBL 91.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.1%)
FFL 14.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.34%)
HUBC 141.00 Increased By ▲ 1.57 (1.13%)
HUMNL 14.29 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.35%)
KEL 6.01 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.67%)
KOSM 7.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.65%)
MLCF 47.81 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (1.12%)
NBP 70.90 Decreased By ▼ -2.86 (-3.88%)
OGDC 229.25 Increased By ▲ 6.59 (2.96%)
PAEL 39.20 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (2.86%)
PIBTL 9.32 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.54%)
PPL 209.65 Increased By ▲ 3.80 (1.85%)
PRL 40.91 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.66%)
PTC 27.00 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.43%)
SEARL 110.56 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (0.29%)
TELE 9.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.87%)
TOMCL 38.84 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (1.65%)
TPLP 14.09 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (2.32%)
TREET 26.50 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
TRG 60.60 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.1%)
UNITY 34.30 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.47%)
WTL 1.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-1.6%)
BR100 12,438 Increased By 139.3 (1.13%)
BR30 39,420 Increased By 542.4 (1.4%)
KSE100 115,354 Increased By 493.1 (0.43%)
KSE30 36,380 Increased By 183.7 (0.51%)

This is apropos two back-to-back letters by this writer to Editor titled ‘Overcapacity dilemma: mismanagement or misjudgment?’ carried by the newspaper yesterday and Wednesday. Having said all this in my two previous letters to the Editor, a billion-dollar question remained unanswered: Why did Pakistan’s policy makers choose to install IPPs with double the capacity needed, while developed countries like the USA, Germany, and China maintain only a 20% reserve capacity.

This decision appears to stem from a short-sighted vision, plagued by sluggish and inefficient decision-making processes. Furthermore, inherent dishonesty and vested interests have often placed personal gains over national interests, leading to decisions that prioritize immediate benefits rather than long-term sustainability for the country.

It is high time that our political leadership clearly distinguish those power plants which are producing almost negligible electricity but enjoying the payment based upon capacity and those who are producing electricity as par with their capacity payment.

This is high time that our analysts, anchorpersons and civil society should change gear and be thankful to IPPs. We should admit our own mistakes and hold all those accountable who took imprudent decisions. Instead of advocating breaching agreements and pursuing legal action against IPPs, they should urge the government to engage with them respectfully, acknowledging their role in alleviating energy crises.

Moreover, the government should take decisive action to mitigate circular debt in the energy sector. Pakistan should introduce a performance-based payment system, prioritizing performance based payment systems. Besides, revising tariff structures to reflect the true cost of electricity, investing in energy efficiency through grid modernization, and enhancing governance to prevent corruption and mismanagement are crucial steps. These measures would reduce financial leakages and ensure a more sustainable and efficient energy sector.

Qamar Bashir

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.