AGL 40.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.4%)
AIRLINK 129.53 Decreased By ▼ -2.20 (-1.67%)
BOP 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
CNERGY 4.63 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.58%)
DCL 8.94 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.36%)
DFML 41.69 Increased By ▲ 1.08 (2.66%)
DGKC 83.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.37%)
FCCL 32.77 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.33%)
FFBL 75.47 Increased By ▲ 6.86 (10%)
FFL 11.47 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.06%)
HUBC 110.55 Decreased By ▼ -1.21 (-1.08%)
HUMNL 14.56 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.75%)
KEL 5.39 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.26%)
KOSM 8.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-6.46%)
MLCF 39.79 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.91%)
NBP 60.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
OGDC 199.66 Increased By ▲ 4.72 (2.42%)
PAEL 26.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.15%)
PIBTL 7.66 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.41%)
PPL 157.92 Increased By ▲ 2.15 (1.38%)
PRL 26.73 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
PTC 18.46 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.87%)
SEARL 82.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-0.7%)
TELE 8.31 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 34.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.12%)
TPLP 9.06 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.84%)
TREET 17.47 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (4.61%)
TRG 61.32 Decreased By ▼ -1.13 (-1.81%)
UNITY 27.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.04%)
WTL 1.38 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (7.81%)
BR100 10,407 Increased By 220 (2.16%)
BR30 31,713 Increased By 377.1 (1.2%)
KSE100 97,328 Increased By 1781.9 (1.86%)
KSE30 30,192 Increased By 614.4 (2.08%)
Pakistan

SC orders ECP to immediately implement reserved seats verdict

  • Top court says electoral watchdog trying to 'create confusion' over SC's original verdict
Published September 14, 2024

The Supreme Court Saturday criticised the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP)‘s request to seek clarification from the top court on its ruling on reserved seats and ordered that it immediately implement the top court’s original decision in the case.

According to the eight judges who earlier ruled in favor of allotting PTI reserved seats in the July verdict, the electoral watchdog’s request was an “attempt to create confusion” and “obstruct” the implementation of the court’s original order.

ECP decides to implement Supreme Court’s order in reserved seats case

“Putting together the record placed before us [top court], and considering the same in light of the short order, leaves in little doubt that the clarification sought by the commission is nothing more than a contrived device and adoption of dilatory tactics,” the eight judges stated in a clarification.

“Having itself recognised Barrister Gohar Ali Khan as the chairman of PTI, the commission cannot now turn around and purport to seek guidance from the court with regard to how the certifications are to be dealt with. The commission cannot approbate and reprobate, taking whatever [shifting] stance as it desires and as may seem to suit its immediate purposes for the moment.”

The verdict further said that “the commission, even if one were to consider the application in the most sympathetic light, has apparently forgotten the well-known de facto doctrine or rule, in terms of which the acts of a person who holds an office are protected even if there may be [and no such conclusion is reached here in relation to the PTI] any issue with the position de jure. It sufficed and the commission was duty-bound in terms of the Constitution to keep in mind that the admitted position [as stated before the court during the hearing of the appeals] is that the PTI was, and is, an enlisted political party.”

On July 12, a 13-judge full bench of the top court overturned the ECP and Peshawar High Court’s (PHC) decision to deprive SIC – the home of PTI-backed independents – of reserved seats and handing it over to the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) led ruling coalition.

The 8-5 majority short verdict ruled that the PTI was eligible for reserved seats for women and minorities in the national and provincial assemblies.

Implementation of SC verdict: ECP fails to chart its course of action

The decision was widely criticised by the government as it not only deprived the ruling alliance of its two-thirds majority but also made PTI the single largest party in both houses.

Following the court’s ruling, the electoral watchdog decided to implement the decision of the Supreme Court.

However, later the ECP asked the Supreme Court to review its 12th July judgment in reserved seats of women and non-Muslims for PTI.

The ECP submitted that it has implemented the judgment to the extent of 39 candidates in due deference to the Court, and also sought clarification from it, but the same may not be taken to prejudice the instant review being a constitutional right of the petitioner.

Reserved seats verdict: ECP files review petition

The ECP stated that the impugned judgment, respectfully, is not in accordance with the Constitution, law and the precedents of this Court; hence the petitioner desires to obtain review of the impugned judgment.

Comments

200 characters
ALI AKBER Sep 14, 2024 07:58pm
ECP heads & members are
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Anthony Samuel Sep 14, 2024 08:09pm
I need loan because we are stuck in too much debt soo plz pass my application for loan
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply