AGL 40.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.4%)
AIRLINK 129.53 Decreased By ▼ -2.20 (-1.67%)
BOP 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
CNERGY 4.63 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.58%)
DCL 8.94 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.36%)
DFML 41.69 Increased By ▲ 1.08 (2.66%)
DGKC 83.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.37%)
FCCL 32.77 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.33%)
FFBL 75.47 Increased By ▲ 6.86 (10%)
FFL 11.47 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.06%)
HUBC 110.55 Decreased By ▼ -1.21 (-1.08%)
HUMNL 14.56 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.75%)
KEL 5.39 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.26%)
KOSM 8.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-6.46%)
MLCF 39.79 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.91%)
NBP 60.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
OGDC 199.66 Increased By ▲ 4.72 (2.42%)
PAEL 26.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.15%)
PIBTL 7.66 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.41%)
PPL 157.92 Increased By ▲ 2.15 (1.38%)
PRL 26.73 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
PTC 18.46 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.87%)
SEARL 82.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-0.7%)
TELE 8.31 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 34.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.12%)
TPLP 9.06 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.84%)
TREET 17.47 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (4.61%)
TRG 61.32 Decreased By ▼ -1.13 (-1.81%)
UNITY 27.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.04%)
WTL 1.38 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (7.81%)
BR100 10,407 Increased By 220 (2.16%)
BR30 31,713 Increased By 377.1 (1.2%)
KSE100 97,328 Increased By 1781.9 (1.86%)
KSE30 30,192 Increased By 614.4 (2.08%)

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan is struggling to keep pace in the global internet race as the country’s average broadband speed languishes at around 10-20 Mbps, far below the global average of 78.62 Mbps, as reported by Speedtest.net.

In the modern world, where internet speed and connectivity form the backbone of economies, Pakistan’s struggle to keep up with global standards is becoming increasingly evident. While countries like the United States, Europe and multiple Arab countries have set minimum broadband speeds of 100 Mbps or more, Pakistan’s average broadband speed languishes at around 10-20 Mbps, far below the global average of 78.62 Mbps, as reported by Speedtest.net.

This considerable digital divide is leaving Pakistan behind in global competitiveness, stifling innovation, and curbing access to the digital economy.

Shahzad Arshad, chairman of the Wireless and Internet Service Providers Association of Pakistan (WISPAP), identified the critical barriers that internet service providers (ISPs) face in their efforts to modernise Pakistan’s internet infrastructure.

“Our infrastructure is outdated and fragmented,” he explains. “We have failed to make the necessary investments in fibre-optic networks that would bring our connectivity up to par with international standards.” The consequences are dire, with unreliable connections and sluggish speeds affecting sectors from education to businesses reliant on fast internet.

He further said that one of the most significant challenges facing ISPs in Pakistan is the Right-of-Way (ROW) issue. “Whenever we attempt to expand our networks, we encounter insurmountable financial barriers,” Arshad said.

He further claimed that Pakistan Railways demands a staggering Rs2 million (approximately) for permitting fibre-optic cables to cross railway lines, either overhead or underground. This challenge is compounded by the fees imposed by housing societies, particularly in newly developed areas, that demand various charges for allowing ISPs to lay fibre-optic cables. “We are essentially being taxed to lay the very infrastructure that will drive the country’s digital future,” Arshad added.

He highlighted the difficulties of deploying fibre-optics in cantonment areas, where the bureaucratic hurdles make it “as difficult as passing through a river of fire.”

These domestic obstacles are only part of the problem.

Pakistan’s ISPs also face the burden of dealing with “monopolistic international gateways”, which provide global internet connectivity at exorbitant rates. These gateways charge ISPs in US dollars, while local ISPs earn in Pakistani rupees. “Every fluctuation in the USD-PKR exchange rate directly increases our costs,” said Arshad. “This system is unsustainable. We are forced to pass these increased costs onto consumers, which is why the internet remains expensive and speeds remain low.” The lack of competition among international gateways only exacerbates the problem. “The limited number of gateways keeps prices artificially high,” explains the chairman WISPAP.

“Without more competition, we have no alternatives, and this strangles the internet sector in Pakistan. Our reliance on these monopolistic gateways leaves little room for improvement or innovation.” Adding to these financial and logistical challenges is Pakistan’s outdated regulatory framework. Countries like the United States have regulatory bodies, such as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), that mandate minimum broadband speeds of 100 Mbps, pushing ISPs to continually upgrade their infrastructure.

In contrast, Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) has yet to enforce a similar regulatory framework. “There is no pressure and help from the PTA to enforce higher speeds and remove hurdles or modernise infrastructure,” Arshad laments. “If the PTA mandated a 100 Mbps minimum broadband speed and removes hurdles, ISPs would be compelled to upgrade their services.”

A further complication arises from licensing issues. While DATA-CVAS licences issued by the PTA allow ISPs to operate, they don’t permit the laying of fibre-optic cables, leaving ISPs dependent on those holding Local Loop (LL) or Fixed Local Loop (FLL) licences. Moving to an FLL licence, however, brings its own set of hurdles, including a licence fee that has jumped from 1.5 million PKR two years ago to Rs2.8 million today, not to mention the significant investment required in equipment and infrastructure. Worse still, the fee is denominated in US dollars, which makes it harder for local companies to afford it.

“Why should a Pakistani business, earning in rupees, have to pay for its licence in dollars?” Arshad asked. FLL licences also come with the outdated requirement to provide landline voice services, a legacy technology that has little demand in a world where most people already own one or more mobile phones. “The mandate to install landlines is redundant,” argues Arshad. “Why should ISPs be forced to invest in a technology that hardly anyone uses anymore?” Arshad offers several solutions to address these systemic issues. He believes that “government intervention” is critical. “The government needs to step in with policies that incentivize ISPs to invest in fibre-optic networks, whether through subsidies, tax breaks, or reducing the regulatory burden,” he said. Arshad also advocates for “increased competition” in the international gateway market. "If more players are allowed into the market as international gateways, prices for bandwidth will drop, and ISPs will have more room to improve their services."

Addressing the issue of fluctuating exchange rates, Arshad urges the government to “localise costs”.

“Pakistan’s ISPs should not be beholden to foreign currency fluctuations. The PTA should find a way to price international bandwidth in “Pakistani rupees” or create safeguards against currency volatility.”

Arshad believes that raising the minimum broadband speed to “100 Mbps” is essential for Pakistan’s digital future. “If the PTA enforces a “100 Mbps” standard and removes the hurdles ISPs face, we would be more than happy to upgrade our infrastructure. Without immediate action to address these infrastructural and regulatory challenges, the country’s digital economy will continue to stagnate, limiting its potential for growth and innovation.”

“The future of Pakistan’s economy is digital,” said Arshad.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.