AIRLINK 195.80 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (0.5%)
BOP 9.84 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.31%)
CNERGY 7.43 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.95%)
FCCL 40.40 Increased By ▲ 1.82 (4.72%)
FFL 16.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.3%)
FLYNG 28.62 Increased By ▲ 1.08 (3.92%)
HUBC 132.95 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (0.91%)
HUMNL 13.94 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.58%)
KEL 4.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.86%)
KOSM 6.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.6%)
MLCF 46.35 Increased By ▲ 0.96 (2.12%)
OGDC 214.80 Increased By ▲ 0.81 (0.38%)
PACE 6.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.29%)
PAEL 40.62 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (1.4%)
PIAHCLA 17.50 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (4.23%)
PIBTL 8.41 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.08%)
POWER 9.75 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (3.39%)
PPL 183.50 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (0.72%)
PRL 42.19 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.86%)
PTC 24.82 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.06%)
SEARL 104.15 Increased By ▲ 1.62 (1.58%)
SILK 1.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 40.15 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (1.8%)
SYM 17.39 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.35%)
TELE 8.80 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.46%)
TPLP 12.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.24%)
TRG 66.30 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (1.38%)
WAVESAPP 11.16 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.45%)
WTL 1.70 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 3.96 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.51%)
BR100 12,027 Increased By 53.1 (0.44%)
BR30 36,465 Increased By 318.9 (0.88%)
KSE100 113,763 Increased By 319.4 (0.28%)
KSE30 35,755 Increased By 119.9 (0.34%)

A day after Hamas’ unprecedented attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, I penned an article titled “Hamas Stunted Israel,” in which I warned that the Israeli response would be robust, devastating, and exemplary. I predicted that once the conflict began, it would not subside quickly. For Israel, a full-scale assault on Hamas would significantly endanger Palestinian civilians, leading to a global backlash against civilian casualties.

This conflict was likely to escalate into multiple fronts, involving Hamas, Fatah, Hezbollah, and even Israel’s own Arab citizens. Given the historical context of the Palestine-Israel conflict, the impotence and vulnerabilities of the Muslim world, their dependence on the USA, and some knowledge of Middle Eastern politics, this outcome seemed inevitable. Ironically, while three of the five major superpowers support Israel in its military actions, resulting in indiscriminate violence against Palestinians, the remaining superpowers issue rhetoric and call for a permanent ceasefire without applying any tangible pressure through kinetic, economic, trade, or investment measures.

This has emboldened Israel to continue its pursuit of Palestinians and those supporting or facilitating them, particularly in the Middle East but also globally, with total impunity. Amid this crisis, global attention has shifted to a fundamental question that could reshape international dynamics: “Who will be the next President of the USA?”

Kamala Harris and Donald Trump have notably different approaches to the Israel-Gaza conflict and the broader West Bank situation, yet the ultimate outcomes might appear similar. Kamala Harris supports Israel’s right to self-defense, particularly in response to the Hamas attacks on October 7, 2023, which resulted in significant Israeli civilian casualties. She also acknowledges the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and has called for a ceasefire, emphasizing that how Israel conducts its defense is crucial. Despite increasing calls from progressive factions, Harris has not proposed conditioning US military aid to Israel. She remains committed to working towards a two-state solution that ensures self-determination for both Israelis and Palestinians.

Qamar Bashir

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.