AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

ISLAMABAD: Port Qasim Electric Power Company Limited (PQEPC) has threatened to shut down operations of its 1,320 MW coal-fired power plant if its outstanding amount is not cleared by the government. This warning was issued by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), PQEPC, Liang Yongbin to Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb and other concerned authorities.

Under the guidance of the Government of Pakistan, the 1320 MW Port Qasim coal-fired Power Project was established under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), to provide most clean, reliable, and economical electricity to the national grid, and endeavored to control the circular debt.

The Power Company argues that it appreciates the efforts of the GoP and the Central Power Purchasing Agency-Guaranteed (CPPA-G) on arranging funds and making electricity tariff payment to IPPs, however, the total due amount of the project reached Rs. 88.2 billion, ie, $ 317 million by 27 September 2024, with a delay payment period of over 6 months and could further escalate.

Energy producers: Aurangzeb takes up payments issue with PQEPC team

“In this case, the Project Shareholders/Sponsors from China and Qatar disclosed significant discontent and request to immediately take all necessary measures to reduce the outstanding amount. We notify that current due amount entitles PQEPC to proceed to suspend the plant operation according to PPA Section 9.10 without any Liquidated Damages,” said the CEO.

The PQEPC claims that it has comparative advantages on the EPP tariff, compared with other oil and LNG power plants. In this regard, project suspension will be a lose-lose situation that both sides should jointly make efforts to avoid.

Therefore, timely settlement of due amount of the Project is imminently required to ensure sustainable power generation and avoid constitution of Loan Agreement Default and GoP Sovereignty Guarantee Default.

“We draw your attention to the critical situation of payment delay confronting the Port Qasim Power Project, and authorities to provide financial support to CPPA-G enabling it to pay off the outstanding amount as early as possible,” said CEO PQEPC, Liang Yongbin in a letter to Finance Minister.

A team of Port Qasim Electric Power Company Limited discussed debt restructuring, loan extension and conversion of its plant on Thar coal.

The company’s team held back to back meetings at Islamabad to explore different options with respect to its financial woes, debts, loans extension etc.

The meetings focused on various matters related to the power sector including the payments to the energy producers and possible ways to resolve the issues hindering timely payments. Matters related to the technical and financial feasibility of converting these projects to run on domestic coal, thereby reducing reliance on imported fuel were also discussed

The Finance Ministry, sources said, is also concerned about nonpayment of overdue amount to 1320 MW coal-fired coal power plant at Port Qasim despite a letter from former Prime Minister of Qatar Sheikh Hamad Bin Jasim Bin Jaber AI Thani.

The Finance Ministry, in a letter to Power Division referred to Prime Minister’s Office’s letter of May 15, 2024 along with a self-explanatory letter from Sheikh Thani to the Prime Minister and subsequent reminder of July 24, 2024 wherein it was stated that his company has not received any dividends on account of delay in the payment of receivables.

According to Finance Ministry, the matter is related to CPPA-G payables towards CPEC IPPs, Port Qasim Power Plant being one of them where Qatar has shareholding of 49%.

The payables of CPPA-G towards CPEC-IPPs as of June 3, 2024, stood at Rs.477 billion. The total receivables of Port Qasim Electric Power (coal) for the same period are around Rs.82 billion.

The Finance Ministry further stated that the matter of clearing payables of CPEC plants was raised before Prime Minister’s visit to China. Finance Division promptly released funds amounting to Rs.227 billion (AJK Rs.50bn, KE-arrears Rs.70bn & KE-TDS Advance Rs.102bn) before visit of Prime Minister in May, 2024. This additional liquidity to power sector was utilized to settle the CPEC-IPPs receivables to the extent of Rs.158 billion.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

Test Oct 06, 2024 09:16am
why govt not paying govt is taking all bills from nation but so many dues are pending.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Mubashir Munir Oct 06, 2024 01:37pm
The government should clear this IPP dues immediately while stop payments to IPPs who are making less than 60% electricity
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Cool Oct 06, 2024 07:45pm
When it coal became clean?
thumb_up Recommended (0)
RS Oct 07, 2024 09:03am
@Mubashir Munir, the contract is to prevail. IPP does not decide the level of capacity utilization. Can we punish an IPP for the consequences of our own decision?
thumb_up Recommended (0)