AIRLINK 180.99 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (0.35%)
BOP 11.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.36%)
CNERGY 8.54 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
CPHL 100.65 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.24%)
FCCL 45.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.13%)
FFL 16.09 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (1.77%)
FLYNG 27.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.5%)
HUBC 141.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-0.58%)
HUMNL 13.04 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.23%)
KEL 4.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.44%)
KOSM 5.87 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.51%)
MLCF 61.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.32%)
OGDC 210.94 Decreased By ▼ -3.38 (-1.58%)
PACE 5.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.34%)
PAEL 46.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-1.35%)
PIAHCLA 17.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.23%)
PIBTL 10.70 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.75%)
POWER 12.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.16%)
PPL 169.50 Decreased By ▼ -3.21 (-1.86%)
PRL 35.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.75%)
PTC 23.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.52%)
SEARL 95.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-0.39%)
SSGC 40.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-1.43%)
SYM 14.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.39%)
TELE 7.45 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.95%)
TPLP 10.34 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (2.58%)
TRG 67.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.74%)
WAVESAPP 10.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
WTL 1.34 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 3.86 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.31%)
AIRLINK 180.99 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (0.35%)
BOP 11.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.36%)
CNERGY 8.54 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
CPHL 100.65 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.24%)
FCCL 45.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.13%)
FFL 16.09 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (1.77%)
FLYNG 27.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.5%)
HUBC 141.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-0.58%)
HUMNL 13.04 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.23%)
KEL 4.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.44%)
KOSM 5.87 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.51%)
MLCF 61.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.32%)
OGDC 210.94 Decreased By ▼ -3.38 (-1.58%)
PACE 5.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.34%)
PAEL 46.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-1.35%)
PIAHCLA 17.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.23%)
PIBTL 10.70 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.75%)
POWER 12.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.16%)
PPL 169.50 Decreased By ▼ -3.21 (-1.86%)
PRL 35.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.75%)
PTC 23.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.52%)
SEARL 95.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-0.39%)
SSGC 40.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-1.43%)
SYM 14.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.39%)
TELE 7.45 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.95%)
TPLP 10.34 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (2.58%)
TRG 67.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.74%)
WAVESAPP 10.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
WTL 1.34 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 3.86 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.31%)
BR100 12,456 Decreased By -25.1 (-0.2%)
BR30 37,699 Decreased By -308.4 (-0.81%)
KSE100 116,644 Decreased By -131.2 (-0.11%)
KSE30 35,778 Decreased By -71.2 (-0.2%)

As the world holds its breath over Israel’s response to Iran’s missile attack earlier this month, the global oil market has taken the most heat. In a see-saw weekly movement pattern, seen for the first time in six years, oil prices have swayed one way and the other every single week for six straight weeks. All this while, fundamentals have largely stayed intact, with a bit of balancing on both supply and demand fronts.

What has visibly worsened is the outlook on geopolitical stability. Although the physical disruption of oil supplies both in terms of production and transportation, has not materialized to any meaningful degree – it is the risk that seems to have increased manifolds from a month ago. The Middle East has arguably never been closer to a full-blow regional war in a very long time than it is today, and it is only fair for that to carry a premium higher than skirmishes the world is used to.

Brent crude’s march to $80/bbl, after having dipped to the lowest in three years – as a result of the sharpest weekly gain in nearly 20 months. The jury is out on when and how Israel respond to the Iranian attack – and the oil market’s response will be in accordance. Speculators in the algo market have switched bets from a sharp bear run just last month to giving ears to calls of oil hitting $100/bbl before the year-end.

The likes of Goldman Sachs and Citi have chalked out the possible disruption scenario if the forthcoming Israel attack on Iran does end up targeting Iranian oil infrastructure. Granted, there is ample reserve capacity in the global system to make up for any loss from Iran, but it will take time to draw from reserves, and fulfilling China’s demands would not be managed overnight. Mind you, Chinese demand may well be struggling to regroup, the stimulus from the government has offered enough legs to maintain strong demand for the rest of 2024.

Meanwhile, authorities in Pakistan continue to shield retail prices from higher incidence of Petroleum Levy. Lopsided taxation choices are a Pakistanspecialty and that continues till date – with the government likely to scamper for tax revenues in the second half of the fiscal year when pushed into a tight corner. With the IMF back in the fold officially, pressure to meet revenue targets will intensify around the end of 2QFY25. Sooner or later, the authorities will have to give up their resistance to PL. It is just unfortunate they may have to do it the tough way- at the time of higher international prices, having failed to take advantage when prices were falling.

Comments

Comments are closed.