AGL 38.50 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 137.25 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.26%)
BOP 5.40 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
CNERGY 3.80 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.53%)
DCL 7.88 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DFML 46.35 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (1.2%)
DGKC 81.19 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (1.05%)
FCCL 29.50 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (2.08%)
FFBL 56.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.26%)
FFL 9.52 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.95%)
HUBC 105.80 Increased By ▲ 2.06 (1.99%)
HUMNL 14.28 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (2.22%)
KEL 3.92 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (5.38%)
KOSM 8.45 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.55%)
MLCF 37.92 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (1.39%)
NBP 68.60 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.29%)
OGDC 168.50 Increased By ▲ 1.90 (1.14%)
PAEL 25.50 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.96%)
PIBTL 6.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.13%)
PPL 131.50 Increased By ▲ 2.14 (1.65%)
PRL 23.76 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.38%)
PTC 15.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.19%)
SEARL 60.80 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 7.03 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.29%)
TOMCL 36.65 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (2.12%)
TPLP 7.86 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TREET 15.61 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (3.65%)
TRG 45.40 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.11%)
UNITY 25.80 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.57%)
WTL 1.23 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 9,267 Increased By 66 (0.72%)
BR30 27,904 Increased By 343.4 (1.25%)
KSE100 86,788 Increased By 730.5 (0.85%)
KSE30 27,289 Increased By 244.9 (0.91%)

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court, on Monday, dismissed Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI)’s review petition against its judgment, which deprived the party from “cricket bat” symbol in general elections held on February 8, 2024.

A three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa, and comprising Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Justice Musarrat Hilali, after hearing PTI’s lawyers Hamid Khan and Barrister Ali Zafar held: “Since no illegality or error in the judgment has been pointed out by the counsels; therefore, the instant petition is dismissed.”

Hamid told the bench that he does not want to argue; therefore, the Court gave opportunity to other lawyers: Barrister Syed Ali Zafar, Barrister Gohar Ali Khan, and Ajmal Toor. However, Ali Zafar stated he also does not want to argue.

Cricket bat symbol case: PTI seeks constitution of larger bench

Hamid requested the court to record his submission “that a judge who is highly biased against the party should not sit in the bench for hearing of a review petition.”

The chief justice observed that in the last hearing (October 11), Hamid had filed an application for adjournment of the case, but no objection was raised on the bench. Hamid replied he objected about it orally.

Justice Mazhar noted that that the application of biasness is filed, adding it cannot be done orally. Justice Musarrat questioned how they (the bench members) are biased. She further said that in the latest application, filed on October 19, PTI has prayed to form a larger bench, but no point of biasness of the bench was mentioned in it.

At the onset of the proceeding, Hamid Khan argued that the matter be sent to the larger bench as it involves constitutional interpretation. He then cited para 14 of majority judgment in reserved seats and asked the bench to examine it, as no stay has been granted against it so far.

The chief justice questioned why his sitting in the bench was challenged at the first stage. He said they would not make any comment on the judgment, as review petitions against it are pending. The CJP asked Hamid when the judgment on PTI intra-party was announced, and when the review against it was filed?

Hamid submitted that the judgment on PTI’s intra-party was passed on January 13, 2024. The chief justice noted that the party had filed review on February 6, two days before the general elections (February 8). Hamid contended that intra-party verdict became ineffective the moment eight judges’ verdict came.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

200 characters