AGL 38.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.26%)
AIRLINK 138.80 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (0.67%)
BOP 5.43 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
CNERGY 3.81 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.79%)
DCL 7.90 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.07%)
DFML 46.02 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.88%)
DGKC 81.30 Increased By ▲ 0.80 (0.99%)
FCCL 29.71 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.54%)
FFBL 56.20 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.72%)
FFL 9.23 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.54%)
HUBC 106.86 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (1.19%)
HUMNL 14.60 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (3.91%)
KEL 4.61 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (7.21%)
KOSM 8.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.07%)
MLCF 38.10 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.32%)
NBP 68.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-0.4%)
OGDC 167.80 Increased By ▲ 0.80 (0.48%)
PAEL 25.70 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.98%)
PIBTL 6.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-9.73%)
PPL 131.30 Increased By ▲ 0.95 (0.73%)
PRL 23.80 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.17%)
PTC 15.80 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.64%)
SEARL 64.50 Increased By ▲ 3.02 (4.91%)
TELE 7.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.43%)
TOMCL 36.35 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.69%)
TPLP 7.85 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.51%)
TREET 15.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.66%)
TRG 45.15 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.58%)
UNITY 25.63 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.47%)
WTL 1.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.57%)
BR100 9,277 Increased By 53.3 (0.58%)
BR30 28,018 Increased By 251.9 (0.91%)
KSE100 86,944 Increased By 477.3 (0.55%)
KSE30 27,308 Increased By 145.2 (0.53%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has ruled that an accused has the right to obtain a video recording of the alleged raid related to a case against him.

The court passed the ruling on an appeal of Iqbal Nasir facing trial of a narcotics case.

The court allowed the appeal and directed the trial court to provide a copy of the USB to the appellant.

The court said, in order to enable the accused to know exactly the contents of the USB and prepare his defence for rebutting the charge through cross-examination, supply of a copy of video record to the accused is necessary.

The court observed, under Article 87 of Qanun-i-Shahadat Order, 1984 any person who has right to inspect the public document can have copy of the same.

The maintained that an accused has every right to inspect the police report and documents annexed with the same except police diaries, therefore, the accused can obtain a copy of the document mentioned in and appended with the police report except police diary.

The court noted that the prosecution clearly stated that the video of the occurrence had been preserved in a USB, and it will be produced during trial for proving the charge against the accused.

As per the prosecution, a police official at the time of raid made video film through camera of his mobile phone regarding proceedings of the raid including arrest of the appellant which was preserved in USB.

The trial court dismissed an application of the appellant seeking the video recording of the raid.

The court regretted that the trial court could not appreciate this legal aspect while passing the impugned order.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

200 characters