AIRLINK 156.12 Increased By ▲ 0.74 (0.48%)
BOP 10.01 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (3.3%)
CNERGY 7.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.84%)
CPHL 84.13 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.07%)
FCCL 44.65 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (2.79%)
FFL 14.89 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.68%)
FLYNG 33.34 Increased By ▲ 3.03 (10%)
HUBC 135.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-0.51%)
HUMNL 12.82 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (2.48%)
KEL 4.16 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (3.48%)
KOSM 5.07 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1%)
MLCF 71.60 Increased By ▲ 2.16 (3.11%)
OGDC 200.22 Decreased By ▼ -3.03 (-1.49%)
PACE 5.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.2%)
PAEL 43.89 Increased By ▲ 1.39 (3.27%)
PIAHCLA 16.74 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.03%)
PIBTL 8.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.91%)
POWER 14.91 Increased By ▲ 0.98 (7.04%)
PPL 148.48 Decreased By ▼ -2.35 (-1.56%)
PRL 29.55 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (2.21%)
PTC 20.85 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.58%)
SEARL 83.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-0.68%)
SSGC 40.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.55%)
SYM 14.88 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.34%)
TELE 6.99 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.14%)
TPLP 8.38 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.33%)
TRG 63.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-0.66%)
WAVESAPP 8.87 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (3.5%)
WTL 1.34 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (5.51%)
YOUW 3.46 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (1.17%)
AIRLINK 156.12 Increased By ▲ 0.74 (0.48%)
BOP 10.01 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (3.3%)
CNERGY 7.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.84%)
CPHL 84.13 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.07%)
FCCL 44.65 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (2.79%)
FFL 14.89 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.68%)
FLYNG 33.34 Increased By ▲ 3.03 (10%)
HUBC 135.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-0.51%)
HUMNL 12.82 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (2.48%)
KEL 4.16 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (3.48%)
KOSM 5.07 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1%)
MLCF 71.60 Increased By ▲ 2.16 (3.11%)
OGDC 200.22 Decreased By ▼ -3.03 (-1.49%)
PACE 5.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.2%)
PAEL 43.89 Increased By ▲ 1.39 (3.27%)
PIAHCLA 16.74 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.03%)
PIBTL 8.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.91%)
POWER 14.91 Increased By ▲ 0.98 (7.04%)
PPL 148.48 Decreased By ▼ -2.35 (-1.56%)
PRL 29.55 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (2.21%)
PTC 20.85 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.58%)
SEARL 83.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-0.68%)
SSGC 40.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.55%)
SYM 14.88 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.34%)
TELE 6.99 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.14%)
TPLP 8.38 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.33%)
TRG 63.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-0.66%)
WAVESAPP 8.87 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (3.5%)
WTL 1.34 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (5.51%)
YOUW 3.46 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (1.17%)
BR100 12,149 Decreased By -11.3 (-0.09%)
BR30 35,394 Increased By 37.7 (0.11%)
KSE100 114,102 Decreased By -11.7 (-0.01%)
KSE30 34,809 Decreased By -108.8 (-0.31%)

ISLAMABAD: Ministry of Finance (MoF) is reportedly unwilling to support Power Division’s plan to legalise revenue-based load shedding across the country, arguing that the matter relating to load shedding to prevent higher cost of electricity needs to be weighed against the fact that capacity payments would still be paid for the available but unutilised electricity, well informed sources told Business Recorder.

Currently all power Distribution Companies (Discos) and K-Electric (KE) are enforcing economic load shedding on a policy decision of Power Division, which does not have legal support of National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra), the Regulator.

At a public hearing on FCA, replying to a question, Chairman Nepra Ch Waseem Mukhtar stated that current revenue-based load shedding is illegal which is why the Regulator is imposing fines on Discos, adding that the government should legalise it if it intends to continue with the policy.

As per IMF dictation but in violation of Nepra’s law: 6- to 12-hour load-shedding under the garb of ‘big losses’

The sources said soon after the comments of Chairman Nepra, Power Division began preparation of its proposal titled “amendments in legal framework to implement economic load management in the country”.

According to Power Division, Prime Minister, while chairing a series of meetings to deliberate on power sector reforms on 15, 18, and 25 April 2024 directed the Power Division to review and propose amendments in existing legal and policy frameworks about Policy and Aggregate Technical & Commercial (AT&C) based Load Management in the country. To initiate such legal point and regulatory changes, the Power-Division notified a committee with members from the PPIB, CPPA, Law Division, Nepra, and independent legal and regulatory experts.

Power Division sent the draft summary to the concerned Ministries as per the rules of business for their comments prior to it submission to the ECC, CCoE or the federal cabinet to make the economic management legal.

Finance Ministry, in its comments, opined that the summary does not contain any empirical data which could be used to analyse the stated benefits of the proposal.

Power Division, in its summary, argued that distribution companies carry out revenue-based load shedding in areas with high line losses. On the other hand, given the trend of sharp increase in power price for the central pool, at times it also becomes economically and financially imprudent to purchase such costly electricity for delivery to consumers.

Due to economic compulsions, in such situations a well-structured load shedding plan is the only feasible solution for viability of power sector. However, Nepra and other legal forums have discussed economic load shedding policies and implementation and have highlighted the need for bringing load shedding due to economic or revenue compulsions into the legal framework.

It however, appears that NEPRA is not in favour of the proposed amendments and has expressed serious reservations on the same.

Finance Division, in its comments, stated that it is primarily concerned with the fiscal implications of the proposal, adding that while the phenomenon of load shedding in high line losses areas may have some rationale, the matter relating to load shedding to prevent higher cost of electricity needs to be weighed against the fact that capacity payments would still be paid for the available but unutilized electricity.

Power Division has been requested to explain to the Cabinet in some detail, the comparative advantage of load shedding aimed at preventing high cost of electricity.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

Waheed ud din Oct 24, 2024 11:54am
This policy will not help in reducing power sector theft. Policy issues should be the Actions that can help to achieve zero power theft.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Mohammad Anwar Oct 24, 2024 12:15pm
Government should seriously focus on curtailing line losses
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Mohammad Anwar Oct 24, 2024 12:16pm
Line losses burden should not be passed on to consumers
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Aam Aadmi Oct 25, 2024 09:26pm
I get sick over reading such news items. It appears I am living in a psychiatric ward. Nobody raises voice over such mad ideas of load shedding. This country has been turned into a Hell.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Tarif Khan Oct 25, 2024 10:40pm
IPPs are getting paid regardless so they should not do load shedding. Govt needs to recover line losses.
thumb_up Recommended (0)