AGL 37.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.08%)
AIRLINK 215.53 Increased By ▲ 18.17 (9.21%)
BOP 9.80 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (2.73%)
CNERGY 6.79 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (14.89%)
DCL 9.17 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (3.97%)
DFML 38.96 Increased By ▲ 3.22 (9.01%)
DGKC 100.25 Increased By ▲ 3.39 (3.5%)
FCCL 36.70 Increased By ▲ 1.45 (4.11%)
FFBL 88.94 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 14.49 Increased By ▲ 1.32 (10.02%)
HUBC 134.13 Increased By ▲ 6.58 (5.16%)
HUMNL 13.63 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.96%)
KEL 5.69 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (6.95%)
KOSM 7.32 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (4.57%)
MLCF 45.87 Increased By ▲ 1.17 (2.62%)
NBP 61.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.23%)
OGDC 232.59 Increased By ▲ 17.92 (8.35%)
PAEL 40.73 Increased By ▲ 1.94 (5%)
PIBTL 8.58 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (4%)
PPL 203.34 Increased By ▲ 10.26 (5.31%)
PRL 40.81 Increased By ▲ 2.15 (5.56%)
PTC 28.31 Increased By ▲ 2.51 (9.73%)
SEARL 108.51 Increased By ▲ 4.91 (4.74%)
TELE 8.74 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (5.3%)
TOMCL 35.83 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (2.37%)
TPLP 13.84 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (4.06%)
TREET 24.38 Increased By ▲ 2.22 (10.02%)
TRG 61.15 Increased By ▲ 5.56 (10%)
UNITY 34.84 Increased By ▲ 1.87 (5.67%)
WTL 1.72 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (7.5%)
BR100 12,244 Increased By 517.6 (4.41%)
BR30 38,419 Increased By 2042.6 (5.62%)
KSE100 113,924 Increased By 4411.3 (4.03%)
KSE30 36,044 Increased By 1530.5 (4.43%)

ISLAMABAD: Ministry of Finance (MoF) is reportedly unwilling to support Power Division’s plan to legalise revenue-based load shedding across the country, arguing that the matter relating to load shedding to prevent higher cost of electricity needs to be weighed against the fact that capacity payments would still be paid for the available but unutilised electricity, well informed sources told Business Recorder.

Currently all power Distribution Companies (Discos) and K-Electric (KE) are enforcing economic load shedding on a policy decision of Power Division, which does not have legal support of National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra), the Regulator.

At a public hearing on FCA, replying to a question, Chairman Nepra Ch Waseem Mukhtar stated that current revenue-based load shedding is illegal which is why the Regulator is imposing fines on Discos, adding that the government should legalise it if it intends to continue with the policy.

As per IMF dictation but in violation of Nepra’s law: 6- to 12-hour load-shedding under the garb of ‘big losses’

The sources said soon after the comments of Chairman Nepra, Power Division began preparation of its proposal titled “amendments in legal framework to implement economic load management in the country”.

According to Power Division, Prime Minister, while chairing a series of meetings to deliberate on power sector reforms on 15, 18, and 25 April 2024 directed the Power Division to review and propose amendments in existing legal and policy frameworks about Policy and Aggregate Technical & Commercial (AT&C) based Load Management in the country. To initiate such legal point and regulatory changes, the Power-Division notified a committee with members from the PPIB, CPPA, Law Division, Nepra, and independent legal and regulatory experts.

Power Division sent the draft summary to the concerned Ministries as per the rules of business for their comments prior to it submission to the ECC, CCoE or the federal cabinet to make the economic management legal.

Finance Ministry, in its comments, opined that the summary does not contain any empirical data which could be used to analyse the stated benefits of the proposal.

Power Division, in its summary, argued that distribution companies carry out revenue-based load shedding in areas with high line losses. On the other hand, given the trend of sharp increase in power price for the central pool, at times it also becomes economically and financially imprudent to purchase such costly electricity for delivery to consumers.

Due to economic compulsions, in such situations a well-structured load shedding plan is the only feasible solution for viability of power sector. However, Nepra and other legal forums have discussed economic load shedding policies and implementation and have highlighted the need for bringing load shedding due to economic or revenue compulsions into the legal framework.

It however, appears that NEPRA is not in favour of the proposed amendments and has expressed serious reservations on the same.

Finance Division, in its comments, stated that it is primarily concerned with the fiscal implications of the proposal, adding that while the phenomenon of load shedding in high line losses areas may have some rationale, the matter relating to load shedding to prevent higher cost of electricity needs to be weighed against the fact that capacity payments would still be paid for the available but unutilized electricity.

Power Division has been requested to explain to the Cabinet in some detail, the comparative advantage of load shedding aimed at preventing high cost of electricity.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

Waheed ud din Oct 24, 2024 11:54am
This policy will not help in reducing power sector theft. Policy issues should be the Actions that can help to achieve zero power theft.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Mohammad Anwar Oct 24, 2024 12:15pm
Government should seriously focus on curtailing line losses
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Mohammad Anwar Oct 24, 2024 12:16pm
Line losses burden should not be passed on to consumers
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Aam Aadmi Oct 25, 2024 09:26pm
I get sick over reading such news items. It appears I am living in a psychiatric ward. Nobody raises voice over such mad ideas of load shedding. This country has been turned into a Hell.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Tarif Khan Oct 25, 2024 10:40pm
IPPs are getting paid regardless so they should not do load shedding. Govt needs to recover line losses.
thumb_up Recommended (0)