AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

In the midst of all the IPP “negotiations” and attempts to “reform” the power sector – the biggest problem in the equation, that is the system demand from the grid, keeps getting trickier. No amount of cost-side measures will put an end to what has now become a significant affordability issue unless ways are found to bring back demand. There is more than one way to do that, but the results may take a long time to come.

Here are the latest numbers on power generation. September generation on the grid went down 6 percent year-on-year to 12.1 billion units. It was down 17 percent year-on-year in August. The cumulative 1QFY25 power generation is down 8 percent year-on-year to 39 billion units – the lowest in five years. This is 12 percent lower than the reference power generation for the same period which stands at 44 billion units. September’s generation is the lowest for the month since September 2018. The 12-month moving average monthly generation fell below 10 billion units for the first time in 44 months. August of 2018 had a higher 12-month moving average than September 2024. This is the extent to which the grid demand has fallen – and will take some doing to rebound.

The reference power generation for 1QFY25 is slated at 44 billion units in the Power Purchase Price (PPP) used for the reference base tariff. The actual generation of 39 billion net units should cause headaches and could possibly take the sheen off the groundwork done on account of IPP negotiations. The monthly Fuel Charges Adjustment (FCA) came down on the negative side for the third straight month, largely due to a more realistic set of assumptions used for the generation mix. One must not forget that the reference fuel prices for FY25 are significantly higher than last year. While the monthly adjustments may be under control, the periodic adjustments could well shoot up, as the capacity charge component will likely go up in unit terms, as the demand goes down.

It is hard to fathom that Pakistan’s domestic, commercial, and industrial electricity demand remains stuck to six years ago – even after accounting for purchasing power erosion and a monumental rise in tariffs. There are more people around, the use case is anecdotally higher, industries are still running (if not growing), and captive generation is significantly lower than five years ago. So, what gives?

Look no further than the rather absurd rooftop solar net metering policy that incentivizes power generation, which the grid buys at very lucrative rates. There have been suggestions to alter the policy to gross metering, but nothing has surfaced on that front as yet. The affluent class is having the cake and eating it too, while those stuck in the middle consumption slabs, have nowhere to go. Every unit that is not generated on the grid costs more to those who cannot move to solar. The policy needs a rethink soon. Without addressing the demand concerns, all efforts to improve transmission, reengineer IPP contracts, privatize discos, and end the single-buyer model – will only deliver half-backed results.

Comments

200 characters
Imran Malik Oct 29, 2024 09:36am
This is absurd. Renewable technology needs battery storage called BESS. Solution is in plain sight but pseudo intellect are wasting time.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Make in Pakistan Oct 29, 2024 11:56am
I see frequent negative comments about rooftop solar and net metering. The fact is only a fraction of it goes to grid, so why criticise it? The focus should be making it cheap for middle/lower class.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Wehshi gujjar Oct 29, 2024 01:21pm
Affluent class? People with 5 marla houses don’t constitute the affluent class. Most people with rooftop solar are firmly within the middle class territory making around 2-4 lakh a month.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Arif Oct 29, 2024 02:40pm
Yes I completely agree. We should burn more and more coal gas and furnace oil. Stop all renewable energy including wind solar hydro. Our air is not dirty enough for the poor to die more quickly.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Akif Janjua Oct 29, 2024 04:34pm
Invest in UPS & generators then throw them in junk.. invest in solar & then throw them at junk too! There is no single consistent policy an individual or company can setup his ROI targets!
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Aam Aadmi Oct 29, 2024 07:52pm
Please do not discourage the use of solar panels. Total dependence on the grid means dependence on corruption, inefficiency and much more. Let the alternative sources of energy flourish.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Nayyer Mahmood Hashmi Oct 29, 2024 07:53pm
I have many comments on this absurd and lucrative rated post but would only say that one thing is missing........ on the top it must be added "Paid Content"
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
ZAB Oct 29, 2024 07:55pm
@Arif, bravo, you think they understand this language. The business class seems above of it. Their religion is might and money.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Kamran Bashir Oct 29, 2024 10:12pm
Absurd argument without any substance.when you change the IPP agreements to take and pay there will be no capacity charges.paid content
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Zahid Amin Shah Oct 29, 2024 11:06pm
You just churned a lot of numbers and then concluded in the last paragraph that the sole cause of stagnating power demand is rooftop solar without quoting a single metric to support this conclusion.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Altaf Khan Oct 30, 2024 05:21am
What a farce analysis. The world is moving towards renewable power systems & the author of this article, on the pay roll of IPPs, is making illogical statements.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Maple leaf Oct 30, 2024 06:08am
Foolish logic supporting expensive electricity production, forcing citizens to buy it. He makes a case to Say NO to renewable source. He is so sad that expensive electric units are not selling.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Khan Oct 30, 2024 07:06am
It looks as saying that bring back people to costly electricity and don't allow them to runaway and take refuge in rooftop solar
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Nadeem Sheikh Oct 30, 2024 07:22am
The nation's commitment is 30% renewable by 2030 and that's a good one. So leave Rooftop Solars and focus instead on reducing theft and corruption in the Power sector
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Atif Oct 30, 2024 07:27am
Interesting..... The energy mix has 1% solar share and that is having such a huge impact.... Leaves our heads scratching.....are we missing something here....
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Adnan Zafar Oct 30, 2024 07:31am
Let DER flourish to meet net zero targets. Committed generation target should be booked to all based on sanctioned load with 50% of the cost booked to GoP for making unwise contracts with IPPs.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Tariq Qurashi Oct 30, 2024 11:16am
I find the conclusion and arguments of this article rather short sighted. Rooftop solar provides the grid with clean, low cost, renewable energy which is the only way to go in the future.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Bilal Oct 30, 2024 01:55pm
Your article indicate 2 things either you are paid for this or intellectually dishonest. Only wayto increase demand is by decreasing its price, at least have some integrity before being a mouthpiece.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Luxy Oct 30, 2024 11:38pm
BR Research, do you do any Research? yes sir, yes sir, 3 bags full
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Ammad Husain Oct 31, 2024 01:57am
Every unit that is not generated on the grid costs more to those who cannot move to solar. The article contains incorrect info issues like theft, non-payment, and losses contribute more to the burden
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Aamir Oct 31, 2024 02:42am
You hide behind the swan song of poor this middle class that just to punish the people who have become self reliant for their power needs ,your pain lies somewhere else and we know what it is
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Actual Truth Oct 31, 2024 03:23am
There is a very easy solution to this, bring the prices of electricity down to realistic levels and people will stop installing solar. Stop beating around the bush.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Munee R Oct 31, 2024 01:49pm
Those who contracted IPPs, should be made to pay all consequential costs / differentials. Be they, politicians, technocrats or bureaucrats. Sell their properties & assets.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply