AGL 38.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.16%)
AIRLINK 136.75 Increased By ▲ 2.56 (1.91%)
BOP 9.22 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (4.18%)
CNERGY 4.75 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.28%)
DCL 8.83 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.85%)
DFML 38.44 Decreased By ▼ -1.34 (-3.37%)
DGKC 85.40 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.29%)
FCCL 35.35 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (1.29%)
FFBL 76.99 Increased By ▲ 1.39 (1.84%)
FFL 12.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.31%)
HUBC 108.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-0.6%)
HUMNL 14.74 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (4.54%)
KEL 5.55 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (2.78%)
KOSM 8.05 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (3.87%)
MLCF 40.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-1.62%)
NBP 71.40 Increased By ▲ 1.70 (2.44%)
OGDC 194.75 Increased By ▲ 1.13 (0.58%)
PAEL 27.00 Increased By ▲ 0.79 (3.01%)
PIBTL 7.48 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.81%)
PPL 167.95 Increased By ▲ 4.10 (2.5%)
PRL 26.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.42%)
PTC 20.40 Increased By ▲ 0.93 (4.78%)
SEARL 92.84 Increased By ▲ 8.44 (10%)
TELE 7.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.25%)
TOMCL 35.32 Increased By ▲ 1.27 (3.73%)
TPLP 8.98 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (2.98%)
TREET 17.34 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.93%)
TRG 59.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.50 (-2.46%)
UNITY 31.00 Increased By ▲ 2.04 (7.04%)
WTL 1.39 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.46%)
BR100 10,895 Increased By 118.9 (1.1%)
BR30 32,660 Increased By 426.2 (1.32%)
KSE100 101,357 Increased By 1274.6 (1.27%)
KSE30 31,488 Increased By 295 (0.95%)

ISLAMABAD/ KARACHI: The creation of Special Refund Zones (SRZs) by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has failed to ensure timely payment of refunds and adjustments to taxpayers.

According to a communication of Pakistan Tax Bar Association to FBR chairman, the Bar would like to recall that specific refund zones have been established by the FBR. However, even then taxpayers are facing hardship in getting their refunds/ adjustments.

It said the Bar would appreciate if FBR can share with statistics about the progress of refund zones. Furthermore, in the presence of MIS, there is no justification for delays in issuing refunds/adjustments.

Non-payment of refunds hits export of seasonal fruits hard

The FBR should make the arrangements for automated process for issuance of Orders issued under section 170 of the Ordinance, initially in the cases of salaried person, already overburden category of taxpayer, at the earliest so that they feel facilitated and relieved.

Otherwise, delay in their refunds/ adjustments will enhance the trust deficit already existed between FBR and taxpayers.

The bar further said that the FBR has legitimatized the category of non-filer by specifying higher rates of tax deduction under various provisions of the Income Tax Ordinance (The Ordinance) for withholding purposes.

The FBR officers have sufficient information of non-filers collected during the course of various proceedings including audit, monitoring of withholdings taxes, further tax paid under Sales Tax Act, 1990 by the taxpayer for doing business with unregistered taxpayer’s and withholdings taxes deducted under section 236 G and 236H of the Ordinance. Therefore, FBR should share the information about the status of non-filers converted into filers.

Almost more than two years have been passed for the implementation drive of point of sale to document the supply chain. The FBR should public the data that how many point of sale have been installed across Pakistan and what is the impact of such implementation in terms of tax revenue collected through this real time invoice mechanism.

The bar has also sought data regarding FIRs registered, amount of tax evaded and how the culprits have been apprehended and brought to justice.

A concept of Synchronized Withholding Administration and payment system (SWAPS) and SWAPS agent were introduced through the Finance Act, 2022. Therefore, when FBR intends to initiate monitoring of withholding taxes through technology, ie, the SWAPS and SWAPS agent? PTBA added.

Meanwhile, sources said that FBR during the recent meeting of the Senate Standing Committee on Finance admitted that Rs 309 million from POS service fees, which was supposed to be utilized for customer incentives and technical improvements, was diverted to employee welfare. The board had collected Rs 647 million since July 2023 through a Re 1 fee on each POS invoice.

Sources said that FBR obtained approval from the former finance minister to deposit the said fee collection in a private bank account, ostensibly to run a customer prize scheme, smoothly. While the scheme was suspended shortly after launch, the Re 1 fee collection continues, primarily benefiting FBR employees, they added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

200 characters