AIRLINK 212.95 Increased By ▲ 3.40 (1.62%)
BOP 10.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.05%)
CNERGY 7.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.86%)
FCCL 34.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.7%)
FFL 18.18 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.72%)
FLYNG 22.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.22%)
HUBC 130.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.89 (-1.43%)
HUMNL 14.21 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.5%)
KEL 5.04 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.2%)
KOSM 7.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.28%)
MLCF 44.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.68 (-1.5%)
OGDC 217.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-0.31%)
PACE 7.65 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.92%)
PAEL 41.91 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.5%)
PIAHCLA 17.39 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.52%)
PIBTL 8.80 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.92%)
POWERPS 12.50 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 187.35 Decreased By ▼ -1.68 (-0.89%)
PRL 41.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-1.96%)
PTC 25.40 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.91%)
SEARL 101.80 Decreased By ▼ -2.16 (-2.08%)
SILK 1.04 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.97%)
SSGC 40.99 Increased By ▲ 1.75 (4.46%)
SYM 19.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.05%)
TELE 9.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.22%)
TPLP 12.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-2.37%)
TRG 69.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-0.26%)
WAVESAPP 10.80 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.75%)
WTL 1.87 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (9.36%)
YOUW 4.15 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.24%)
BR100 12,091 Increased By 11.9 (0.1%)
BR30 36,512 Decreased By -90.7 (-0.25%)
KSE100 116,124 Increased By 71.2 (0.06%)
KSE30 36,605 Increased By 27.3 (0.07%)

LAHORE: Industrial consumers have rejected winter electricity package, saying that their power consumption was down by approximately 40% YoY in October 2024, and 60% compared to the year before.

To benefit from the incremental package, they said, industries must first recover their reduced consumption to previous years’ levels, which is calculated based on the 50-30-20 weighted average of the past three years for the same month. After this, they are required to increase power usage by an additional 25% to fully maximize benefits.

Omar Hameed said this mechanism is highly unrealistic, as increasing power consumption is tied to manufacturing demand, which depends on confirmed orders. Scaling up production also involves significant costs, including labour and other overheads, which far outweigh the limited relief offered by the 25% incremental savings, he added.

Another person, requesting anonymity, said the 25% cap on incremental consumption is also unnecessarily restrictive. Current demand remains highly suppressed due to skyrocketing tariffs over the past two years, meaning the tipping point for higher generation costs is still far of. He was of the view that removing the cap would allow industries greater flexibility to benefit from the package.

Furthermore, one energy expert said the proposed Rs 26.07/kWh tariff is misaligned with actual marginal generation costs, which, based on expected winter demand levels of 8,000-13,000 MW, is closer to Rs 17/kWh. The higher tariff figure provided by CPPA-G appears inflated and fails to create a meaningful incentive for industries to increase energy demand on the grid. A revised tariff closer to Rs 17/kWh would encourage significantly higher consumption and support the government’s energy demand and transition-to-grid objectives.

Additionally, he said, the package could be further improved by accounting for intra-day fluctuations in power demand and generation costs. During off-peak hours, particularly at night, demand is much lower, and marginal generation costs are even below Rs 17/kWh. A time-of-use (ToU) pricing structure for incremental consumption could make the package more effective by offering lower rates during low-demand periods. The necessary infrastructure for ToU pricing already exists, as industries are equipped with smart meters, making it easy to implement.

There was a consensus that the package can significantly improve its appeal and utility for industrial consumers by removing the 25% cap, reducing the incremental tariff closer to Rs 17/kWh, and introducing ToU pricing.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.