AIRLINK 182.70 Increased By ▲ 2.53 (1.4%)
BOP 11.55 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.14%)
CNERGY 8.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.82%)
CPHL 94.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-0.66%)
FCCL 47.02 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.07%)
FFL 16.44 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.86%)
FLYNG 28.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.7%)
HUBC 147.20 Increased By ▲ 1.96 (1.35%)
HUMNL 13.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.31%)
KEL 4.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.56%)
KOSM 5.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.35%)
MLCF 68.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.88 (-1.27%)
OGDC 212.50 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (0.13%)
PACE 6.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.33%)
PAEL 48.40 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (1.06%)
PIAHCLA 17.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.06%)
PIBTL 10.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.61%)
POWER 14.60 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (7.83%)
PPL 171.01 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.12%)
PRL 34.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-1.18%)
PTC 22.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.06%)
SEARL 95.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.35%)
SSGC 42.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.87 (-2.01%)
SYM 15.61 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (10.01%)
TELE 7.57 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (4.13%)
TPLP 10.19 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (3.03%)
TRG 65.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-0.44%)
WAVESAPP 9.80 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
WTL 1.36 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.26%)
YOUW 3.81 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.87%)
AIRLINK 182.70 Increased By ▲ 2.53 (1.4%)
BOP 11.55 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.14%)
CNERGY 8.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.82%)
CPHL 94.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-0.66%)
FCCL 47.02 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.07%)
FFL 16.44 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.86%)
FLYNG 28.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.7%)
HUBC 147.20 Increased By ▲ 1.96 (1.35%)
HUMNL 13.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.31%)
KEL 4.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.56%)
KOSM 5.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.35%)
MLCF 68.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.88 (-1.27%)
OGDC 212.50 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (0.13%)
PACE 6.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.33%)
PAEL 48.40 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (1.06%)
PIAHCLA 17.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.06%)
PIBTL 10.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.61%)
POWER 14.60 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (7.83%)
PPL 171.01 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.12%)
PRL 34.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-1.18%)
PTC 22.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.06%)
SEARL 95.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.35%)
SSGC 42.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.87 (-2.01%)
SYM 15.61 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (10.01%)
TELE 7.57 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (4.13%)
TPLP 10.19 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (3.03%)
TRG 65.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-0.44%)
WAVESAPP 9.80 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
WTL 1.36 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.26%)
YOUW 3.81 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.87%)
BR100 12,710 Increased By 7.6 (0.06%)
BR30 38,389 Increased By 131.4 (0.34%)
KSE100 118,538 Increased By 155 (0.13%)
KSE30 36,404 Increased By 8.8 (0.02%)

KARACHI: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) and a top Chartered Accountants (CA) firm are at loggerheads over Rs.1.8 million in sales tax deductions on services rendered for automated data processing and audit work.

According to the details, the dispute stems from a contract awarded to the CA firm for the Audit of Pakistan Revenue Automation (Private) Limited. Following delayed payments, the firm sought legal recourse through the Islamabad High Court, which resulted in a court-directed payment of Rs. 60 million issued on June 27, 2024.

The timing of services and tax implementation is at the heart of the controversy. While the CA firm provided services between February 2019 and July 2019, payment was released in June 2024.

PRAL & FBR staff found involved: A dormant account used for Rs1.625trn fake supplies?

The firm contended that the sales tax deduction was inappropriate since the relevant tax provision under the ICT (Tax on Services) Ordinance, 2001 became effective July 1, 2019 – after their services were completed.

The Directorate General IT & DT has sought clarification from the member (IR-Policy) regarding the legitimacy of the sales tax charges and the associated withholding.

“No response was received so far, highlighting potential administrative inefficiencies within the FBR,” sources said.

Adding complexity to the matter, sources revealed that despite objecting to the tax deduction, the CA firm had not reflected the invoices of the said service in their monthly sales tax returns since 2019. Additionally, neither the concerned commissioner nor field formation took action on the issue. However, the court has now been informed that the amount in question has been made available on the portal for adjustment in the forthcoming tax returns.

The situation is further complicated as other departments are making higher withholding tax deductions, reportedly influenced by the scrutiny from the Auditors General of Pakistan (AGP).

Sources informed that due to the lack of FBR’s effective monitoring mechanism for withholding tax deductions, the AGP was frequently identifying discrepancies in deduction amounts.

Furthermore, sources said that the absence of clear guidelines from the FBR, despite several requests, has created uncertainty for taxpayers and raised questions about the organization’s internal management procedures, highlighting broader concerns about tax administration and the need for improved coordination between withholding agents and tax authorities.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

Love Your Country Dec 17, 2024 01:54pm
If FBR's internal systems were well organised and functioning properly, the nation would not be in the financial mess we are facing for decades. This goes for staff and systems.
thumb_up Recommended (0)