AIRLINK 177.92 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (0.52%)
BOP 12.88 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.55%)
CNERGY 7.58 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.2%)
FCCL 45.99 Increased By ▲ 3.97 (9.45%)
FFL 15.16 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (2.16%)
FLYNG 27.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.3%)
HUBC 132.04 Decreased By ▼ -2.47 (-1.84%)
HUMNL 13.29 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (2.55%)
KEL 4.46 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.45%)
KOSM 6.06 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 56.63 Increased By ▲ 2.12 (3.89%)
OGDC 223.84 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (0.57%)
PACE 5.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.66%)
PAEL 41.51 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.51%)
PIAHCLA 16.01 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (2.5%)
PIBTL 9.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.79%)
POWER 11.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.09%)
PPL 186.63 Increased By ▲ 2.64 (1.43%)
PRL 34.90 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (1.72%)
PTC 23.53 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.81%)
SEARL 94.96 Increased By ▲ 3.89 (4.27%)
SILK 1.14 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.7%)
SSGC 35.50 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (4.47%)
SYM 15.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-2.01%)
TELE 7.87 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.13%)
TPLP 10.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.73%)
TRG 59.20 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (0.82%)
WAVESAPP 10.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.09%)
WTL 1.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.74%)
YOUW 3.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.26%)
AIRLINK 177.92 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (0.52%)
BOP 12.88 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.55%)
CNERGY 7.58 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.2%)
FCCL 45.99 Increased By ▲ 3.97 (9.45%)
FFL 15.16 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (2.16%)
FLYNG 27.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.3%)
HUBC 132.04 Decreased By ▼ -2.47 (-1.84%)
HUMNL 13.29 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (2.55%)
KEL 4.46 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.45%)
KOSM 6.06 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 56.63 Increased By ▲ 2.12 (3.89%)
OGDC 223.84 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (0.57%)
PACE 5.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.66%)
PAEL 41.51 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.51%)
PIAHCLA 16.01 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (2.5%)
PIBTL 9.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.79%)
POWER 11.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.09%)
PPL 186.63 Increased By ▲ 2.64 (1.43%)
PRL 34.90 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (1.72%)
PTC 23.53 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.81%)
SEARL 94.96 Increased By ▲ 3.89 (4.27%)
SILK 1.14 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.7%)
SSGC 35.50 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (4.47%)
SYM 15.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-2.01%)
TELE 7.87 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.13%)
TPLP 10.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.73%)
TRG 59.20 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (0.82%)
WAVESAPP 10.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.09%)
WTL 1.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.74%)
YOUW 3.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.26%)
BR100 12,130 Increased By 107.3 (0.89%)
BR30 37,246 Increased By 640.2 (1.75%)
KSE100 114,399 Increased By 685.5 (0.6%)
KSE30 35,458 Increased By 156.2 (0.44%)

EDITORIAL: Our governing politicians are unwilling to embrace the idea of devolution of power to the grassroots. Local governments (LGs) elections in the largest province of Punjab were last held in 2017 upon the apex court’s repeated directives, but the renewal process has remained stalemated since those LGs’ term ended in 2022. During the recent years, the other three provinces have conducted polls to this third tier of governance, but without handing them essential administrative powers and financial autonomy. And the fate of LGs in the Islamabad capital territory continues to hang in the balance since February 2021 when the previous local bodies completed their term.

Notably, the last elections were won by the then ruling party, the PML-N, by a significant margin. Consequently, its candidate became the first mayor of Islamabad. Yet the federal government having little interest in delivering efficient services to people at the grassroots did not bother to provide its mayor with necessary funds or to finalise the required rules for infrastructure development. Later, the PTI government treated the Metropolitan Corporation of Islamabad with similar indifference.

The present ruling alliance’s reluctance to go for fresh elections may be attributable to an apprehension of losing to its rival opposition party, whose popularity graph is believed to have risen substantially. The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) also appears to be acting as a facilitator. In the last four years, it has issued several schedules for the polls, only to cancel them on one pretext or the other. Under the previous PDM government, it had announced elections for 50 union councils (UCs) but postponed them after the UCs number was increased to 101. Before August 20 polling schedule the present ruling alliance raised that number to 125. Later, it made yet another change, upping the number of seats in the UCs from six to nine, followed by an amendment to the Local Governments Act. Thus far, the ECP’s deferment decisions could be understandable. But then on August 20 of this year, it extended the polling date from September 29 to October 9, this time acknowledging that it was acceding to the request of local politicians — belonging to the ruling PML-N, of course. And the next month, it issued a notification holding the electoral exercise “in abeyance” till further orders. Now, as per its latest order announced this past Tuesday, delimitation of constituencies and wards is to start from December 21 onwards. That work followed by other procedural requirements is to be completed and final lists of constituencies/wards published on March 12.

However, a fresh and firm date for elections stays elusive. Meanwhile, all signs suggest the ruling alliance is unprepared to take the risk of going for the electoral exercise. And considering its track record the ECP is likely to take advantage of the ambiguity in the relevant law regarding timelines for specific procedures and schedule to keep delaying the LG polls for the foreseeable future. As with the wider national scene, those in positions of power will have no qualms about delivering politics of disappointment to voters in Islamabad.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

zh Dec 22, 2024 10:44pm
Neither the provincial governments nor the establishment is interested in the entitled LGs. There will too many independent bodies to control.
thumb_up Recommended (0)