AIRLINK 193.77 Decreased By ▼ -6.98 (-3.48%)
BOP 9.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-3.33%)
CNERGY 7.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.82%)
FCCL 39.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-1.62%)
FFL 16.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.52 (-3.09%)
FLYNG 25.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.81 (-3.04%)
HUBC 129.86 Decreased By ▼ -2.74 (-2.07%)
HUMNL 13.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.65%)
KEL 4.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.58%)
KOSM 6.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.82%)
MLCF 45.57 Decreased By ▼ -1.17 (-2.5%)
OGDC 209.11 Decreased By ▼ -3.32 (-1.56%)
PACE 6.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-2.61%)
PAEL 41.85 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (1.38%)
PIAHCLA 17.13 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.76%)
PIBTL 7.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.59%)
POWER 9.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.64%)
PPL 177.92 Decreased By ▼ -3.54 (-1.95%)
PRL 39.01 Decreased By ▼ -2.77 (-6.63%)
PTC 25.53 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (3.36%)
SEARL 106.73 Decreased By ▼ -5.11 (-4.57%)
SILK 0.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-1%)
SSGC 39.53 Decreased By ▼ -4.39 (-10%)
SYM 19.45 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (2.48%)
TELE 8.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.59%)
TPLP 12.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-3.02%)
TRG 65.34 Decreased By ▼ -2.13 (-3.16%)
WAVESAPP 11.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-2.36%)
WTL 1.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-3.35%)
YOUW 3.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.25%)
BR100 12,030 Decreased By -140.3 (-1.15%)
BR30 35,812 Decreased By -776.7 (-2.12%)
KSE100 113,520 Decreased By -1360.2 (-1.18%)
KSE30 35,651 Decreased By -473.7 (-1.31%)

EDITORIAL: Months after sanctioning three Chinese companies, including a research institute, accusing them of supplying missile applicant items to Pakistan’s National Development Complex (NDC), the US has slapped new sanctions on NDC, along with three commercial entities, purportedly for developing long-range ballistic missiles.

Speaking at think-tank in Washington a day after the action, Deputy National Security Adviser Jon Finer said Pakistan has developed increasingly sophisticated missile technology, from long-range ballistic missile systems to equipment, and went on to make the bizarre claim that if this trend continues “Pakistan will have the capability to strike targets beyond South Asia, including the United States.”

The State Department’s Principal Deputy Spokesperson Vedant Patel rubbed it in again at a media briefing, saying that the designations were “based on our concerns about Pakistan’s long-range ballistic missiles”, adding the rhetorical assertion that the US is committed to maintaining the global non-proliferation regime. The message being conveyed to Pakistan is that staying on good terms with both the US and China is incompatible.

Any impartial observer of the scene knows that this country’s conventional and unconventional capabilities are defensive in nature, aimed at countering India with which it has fought two full-scale wars and third a limited one over the unresolved Kashmir issue. It maintains minimal nuclear deterrence capability and missiles programme to prevent its adversary from starting a major conflict in the future.

Predictably, the Foreign Office in Islamabad has reacted sharply to America’s new measures which, it said, are based on mere doubt and suspicion without any evidence, and that “such policies have dangerous implications for the strategic stability of our region and beyond.”

Rightly terming them as discriminatory and reflective of the US’ double standards, the FO cited past waivers of advanced military technology and transfers “to other countries” — an indirect reference to India.

In fact, the US has been doing a lot more to bolster India’s capabilities in a bid to pitch it as a counterweight to China’s military heft and increasing political influence.

As a press report points out, during the recent years the US permitted the transfer of high-end defence technologies, including advanced missile systems under the Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement and the Communications Capability and Security Agreement.

The two countries have also collaborated on missile development, complete with co-production of systems under the Defence Technology and Trade Initiative as well as the Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technologies.

Meanwhile, New Delhi is playing both sides against the middle, putting one foot in the US-led QUAD grouping dedicated solely to encircling China and curbing its power in the Pacific region; and the other foot in the China-Russia led Global South bloc, the BRICS, which now is challenging the Western nations’ devised international order by evolving alternative economic and diplomatic options.

Coming back to the issue at hand, Pakistan has faced sanctions before on account of its nuclear programme and stayed its ground. So it is expected to do this time around since the primary objective of its nuclear and missile programme is to deal with the threat India poses to its security.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

Aam Aadmi Dec 24, 2024 02:49pm
An article scripted by the Foreign Ministry of Pakistan. Every country has a right to express its concerns and impose sanctions in 'self- defense'.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Az_Iz Dec 25, 2024 06:12am
What is said here is so true.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Re=== Dec 27, 2024 11:19pm
Meanwhile, New Delhi is playing both sides against the middle--well that country is smart. If you are not able to manage such balances, then it is your fault.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Re=== Dec 27, 2024 11:20pm
Pakistan has ceased to exist as a normal country. It goes from hiccups to hiccups losing respect. And when that happens, you become the punching bag. This world is cruel and not for the weak.
thumb_up Recommended (0)