AIRLINK 140.01 Decreased By ▼ -13.31 (-8.68%)
BOP 9.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-5.52%)
CNERGY 6.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-7.19%)
CPHL 75.01 Decreased By ▼ -6.70 (-8.2%)
FCCL 42.79 Decreased By ▼ -1.25 (-2.84%)
FFL 13.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.03 (-7.04%)
FLYNG 35.15 Decreased By ▼ -1.52 (-4.15%)
HUBC 127.50 Decreased By ▼ -5.97 (-4.47%)
HUMNL 12.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-5.14%)
KEL 4.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-4.11%)
KOSM 4.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-9.23%)
MLCF 66.98 Decreased By ▼ -3.22 (-4.59%)
OGDC 197.20 Decreased By ▼ -5.73 (-2.82%)
PACE 4.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-9.63%)
PAEL 40.90 Decreased By ▼ -2.20 (-5.1%)
PIAHCLA 15.21 Decreased By ▼ -1.26 (-7.65%)
PIBTL 7.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.89 (-10.09%)
POWER 13.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-4.17%)
PPL 144.75 Decreased By ▼ -7.05 (-4.64%)
PRL 27.10 Decreased By ▼ -2.42 (-8.2%)
PTC 18.70 Decreased By ▼ -1.69 (-8.29%)
SEARL 73.80 Decreased By ▼ -7.71 (-9.46%)
SSGC 32.47 Decreased By ▼ -3.61 (-10.01%)
SYM 13.44 Decreased By ▼ -1.14 (-7.82%)
TELE 6.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.61 (-8.7%)
TPLP 7.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-7.45%)
TRG 59.60 Decreased By ▼ -4.48 (-6.99%)
WAVESAPP 8.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.99 (-10.27%)
WTL 1.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-8.27%)
YOUW 3.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-8.77%)
AIRLINK 140.01 Decreased By ▼ -13.31 (-8.68%)
BOP 9.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-5.52%)
CNERGY 6.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-7.19%)
CPHL 75.01 Decreased By ▼ -6.70 (-8.2%)
FCCL 42.79 Decreased By ▼ -1.25 (-2.84%)
FFL 13.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.03 (-7.04%)
FLYNG 35.15 Decreased By ▼ -1.52 (-4.15%)
HUBC 127.50 Decreased By ▼ -5.97 (-4.47%)
HUMNL 12.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-5.14%)
KEL 4.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-4.11%)
KOSM 4.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-9.23%)
MLCF 66.98 Decreased By ▼ -3.22 (-4.59%)
OGDC 197.20 Decreased By ▼ -5.73 (-2.82%)
PACE 4.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-9.63%)
PAEL 40.90 Decreased By ▼ -2.20 (-5.1%)
PIAHCLA 15.21 Decreased By ▼ -1.26 (-7.65%)
PIBTL 7.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.89 (-10.09%)
POWER 13.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-4.17%)
PPL 144.75 Decreased By ▼ -7.05 (-4.64%)
PRL 27.10 Decreased By ▼ -2.42 (-8.2%)
PTC 18.70 Decreased By ▼ -1.69 (-8.29%)
SEARL 73.80 Decreased By ▼ -7.71 (-9.46%)
SSGC 32.47 Decreased By ▼ -3.61 (-10.01%)
SYM 13.44 Decreased By ▼ -1.14 (-7.82%)
TELE 6.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.61 (-8.7%)
TPLP 7.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-7.45%)
TRG 59.60 Decreased By ▼ -4.48 (-6.99%)
WAVESAPP 8.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.99 (-10.27%)
WTL 1.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-8.27%)
YOUW 3.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-8.77%)
BR100 11,689 Decreased By -420.9 (-3.48%)
BR30 33,581 Decreased By -1757.6 (-4.97%)
KSE100 110,139 Decreased By -3429.9 (-3.02%)
KSE30 33,689 Decreased By -991.3 (-2.86%)

This is apropos a Business Recorder op-ed ‘Six canals kerfuffle’ carried by the newspaper yesterday. The writer, Rashed Rahman, has rightly portrayed Sindh government’s response to Federal Minister Ahsan Iqbal’s “dismissive attitude” to Sindh’s objections to the proposed construction of six new canals on the Indus to water the Cholistan desert in Punjab.

Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Sindh president Nisar Khuhro and former chairman Senate Raza Rabbani have criticised Ahsan Iqbal for rubbishing Sindh’s objections to the project as a ‘baseless debate’. “To prove the worthy Federal Minister for Planning wrong, Khuhro and Rabbani have in no uncertain terms laid out Sindh’s case on the issue,” according to the writer.

Here I have a question to ask with a view to seeking plausible answers from the Sindh government in particular. It was last month that almost all political and religious parties, nationalist groups and civil society organizations took part in widespread rally held across Sindh against the plan of digging six canals to irrigate land in Punjab. Unfortunately, PPP was conspicuous by its absence in protests.

My question is why the Sindh government or the Sindh chapter of PPP stayed away from those protests when it too has rejected the federal and Punjab governments’ plan? Secondly, the party or its government in Sindh has done little or nothing so far to ensure that Sindh received its due share from the Indus waters. In my view, the six canals plan is more inimical to the future of Sindh’s agriculture than the seemingly shelved Kalabagh Dam project.

Nasir Husain Nizamani

Karachi

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed.