AIRLINK 183.51 Increased By ▲ 3.34 (1.85%)
BOP 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -1.14 (-9.98%)
CNERGY 8.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.29%)
CPHL 94.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.03 (-1.08%)
FCCL 46.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.43%)
FFL 16.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.92%)
FLYNG 28.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.87%)
HUBC 145.90 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (0.45%)
HUMNL 13.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.61%)
KEL 4.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.78%)
KOSM 5.76 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.59%)
MLCF 67.03 Decreased By ▼ -2.41 (-3.47%)
OGDC 213.35 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (0.53%)
PACE 6.08 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1%)
PAEL 47.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.17%)
PIAHCLA 17.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.22%)
PIBTL 9.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-5.86%)
POWER 14.30 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (5.61%)
PPL 170.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-0.3%)
PRL 33.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-2.22%)
PTC 22.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-2.39%)
SEARL 95.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-0.87%)
SSGC 41.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.47 (-3.39%)
SYM 15.61 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (10.01%)
TELE 7.49 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (3.03%)
TPLP 9.98 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.91%)
TRG 67.30 Increased By ▲ 1.70 (2.59%)
WAVESAPP 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.2%)
WTL 1.36 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.26%)
YOUW 3.84 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.67%)
AIRLINK 183.51 Increased By ▲ 3.34 (1.85%)
BOP 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -1.14 (-9.98%)
CNERGY 8.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.29%)
CPHL 94.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.03 (-1.08%)
FCCL 46.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.43%)
FFL 16.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.92%)
FLYNG 28.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.87%)
HUBC 145.90 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (0.45%)
HUMNL 13.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.61%)
KEL 4.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.78%)
KOSM 5.76 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.59%)
MLCF 67.03 Decreased By ▼ -2.41 (-3.47%)
OGDC 213.35 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (0.53%)
PACE 6.08 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1%)
PAEL 47.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.17%)
PIAHCLA 17.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.22%)
PIBTL 9.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-5.86%)
POWER 14.30 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (5.61%)
PPL 170.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-0.3%)
PRL 33.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-2.22%)
PTC 22.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-2.39%)
SEARL 95.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-0.87%)
SSGC 41.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.47 (-3.39%)
SYM 15.61 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (10.01%)
TELE 7.49 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (3.03%)
TPLP 9.98 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.91%)
TRG 67.30 Increased By ▲ 1.70 (2.59%)
WAVESAPP 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.2%)
WTL 1.36 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.26%)
YOUW 3.84 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.67%)
BR100 12,666 Decreased By -36.5 (-0.29%)
BR30 38,108 Decreased By -149.5 (-0.39%)
KSE100 118,430 Increased By 47 (0.04%)
KSE30 36,403 Increased By 8.1 (0.02%)

BERLIN: Bundesliga clubs across Germany may be forced to cover the costs of police at certain ‘high-risk’ games, after a German court upheld a ruling in the city state of Bremen.

The federal constitutional court on Tuesday dismissed an appeal by the German Football Leagues (DFL) against the practice of asking clubs to pay additional police costs in ‘high risk’ games.

In 2015, the government in the state of Bremen handed club Werder Bremen a bill of around 400,000 euros ($410,100) relating to the home derby match with neighbouring Hamburg.

The DFL has waged a 10-year legal battle to have the fine overturned but suffered a series of legal defeats.

On Tuesday the Karlsruhe-based court dismissed the DFL’s claim that the practice was unconstitutional.

While the ruling only applies to Bremen, one of Germany’s 16 federal states, the decision is likely to have wide-ranging impacts, with other state governments considering following suit.

Police maintain a presence at matches in the professional leagues but around 50 games per year, usually derby fixtures or those with long-standing rivalries, are deemed higher risk.

Bremen’s regional interior minister Ulrich Maeurer welcomed the decision and revealed the state had already billed Werder Bremen around two million euros over the past decade.

Recognising how the additional costs will cause a burden for clubs, Maeurer floated the idea of a DFL fund for police costs, an idea the governing body has rejected.

The DFL argued areas outside stadiums were the responsibility of the state and should be covered by tax revenue.

The German FA (DFB) on Tuesday said the ruling was “incorrect”, saying it made clubs “liable for security costs in public areas over which they have no control”.

Covering police costs could “threaten the existence” of smaller clubs, the DFB said, adding the ruling “does not improve fan security at all”.

Tuesday’s decision was also criticised by fan groups.

In a statement, fan organisation ‘Unsere Kurve’ said it was “shocked” at the decision and said German football contributed around 1.6 billion euros per season in tax revenue.

Comments

Comments are closed.