AIRLINK 160.28 Decreased By ▼ -4.30 (-2.61%)
BOP 9.48 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.94%)
CNERGY 7.81 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (3.58%)
CPHL 86.11 Increased By ▲ 1.91 (2.27%)
FCCL 43.73 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (1.77%)
FFL 14.96 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.94%)
FLYNG 28.69 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (1.7%)
HUBC 137.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-0.54%)
HUMNL 12.45 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.47%)
KEL 4.11 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.74%)
KOSM 5.24 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 68.92 Increased By ▲ 2.45 (3.69%)
OGDC 207.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.09%)
PACE 5.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.34%)
PAEL 43.20 Increased By ▲ 1.30 (3.1%)
PIAHCLA 16.78 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.9%)
PIBTL 8.92 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.45%)
POWER 13.48 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.43%)
PPL 157.10 Decreased By ▼ -3.15 (-1.97%)
PRL 28.59 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (2.47%)
PTC 20.58 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (1.48%)
SEARL 84.59 Increased By ▲ 0.86 (1.03%)
SSGC 39.33 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (4.27%)
SYM 15.18 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (3.97%)
TELE 7.03 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TPLP 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.92%)
TRG 63.84 Increased By ▲ 1.30 (2.08%)
WAVESAPP 8.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.66%)
WTL 1.26 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 3.54 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (1.14%)
AIRLINK 160.28 Decreased By ▼ -4.30 (-2.61%)
BOP 9.48 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.94%)
CNERGY 7.81 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (3.58%)
CPHL 86.11 Increased By ▲ 1.91 (2.27%)
FCCL 43.73 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (1.77%)
FFL 14.96 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.94%)
FLYNG 28.69 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (1.7%)
HUBC 137.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-0.54%)
HUMNL 12.45 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.47%)
KEL 4.11 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.74%)
KOSM 5.24 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 68.92 Increased By ▲ 2.45 (3.69%)
OGDC 207.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.09%)
PACE 5.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.34%)
PAEL 43.20 Increased By ▲ 1.30 (3.1%)
PIAHCLA 16.78 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.9%)
PIBTL 8.92 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.45%)
POWER 13.48 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.43%)
PPL 157.10 Decreased By ▼ -3.15 (-1.97%)
PRL 28.59 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (2.47%)
PTC 20.58 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (1.48%)
SEARL 84.59 Increased By ▲ 0.86 (1.03%)
SSGC 39.33 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (4.27%)
SYM 15.18 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (3.97%)
TELE 7.03 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TPLP 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.92%)
TRG 63.84 Increased By ▲ 1.30 (2.08%)
WAVESAPP 8.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.66%)
WTL 1.26 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 3.54 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (1.14%)
BR100 12,154 Increased By 88.7 (0.74%)
BR30 35,868 Increased By 101.3 (0.28%)
KSE100 114,872 Increased By 808.3 (0.71%)
KSE30 35,267 Increased By 233.5 (0.67%)
Pakistan

No treaty of alliance with Pakistan, nor is Islamabad a technical ally: White House

  • Remarks come in backdrop of Pakistan's appeal to global community over emerging terrorist threats from Afghanistan
Published January 15, 2025

The United States has said that Pakistan was never a technical ally of the United States and that “there was no treaty of alliance with Islamabad”.

White House National Security Communications Advisor John Kirby’s remarks came after a journalist asked if the Biden administration was making any efforts concerning Pakistan’s appeal to the global community over the “mess in Afghanistan, regrouping of al-Qaida, IS, Taliban, TTP and all those terrorist groups” during a press briefing on Tuesday.

“Well, first, I’d – as you know, Pakistan was never a technical ally of the United States,” Kirby said.

“I mean, there was no treaty of alliance with Pakistan.

“But certainly, over many, many years in the last couple of decades, we partnered with Pakistan as appropriate to deal with the terrorist threat that still exists on that spine between Afghanistan and Pakistan. And we recognize that Pakistan is still – still the Pakistani people fall victim to terrorist violence coming from across that border.

“We recognize that. And we have and for as long as we’ll be in office here remain committed to working with Pakistan to address those common threats and challenges. And that’s not – that hasn’t changed. It’s not going to change.”

US asks Kabul to conduct itself responsibly

The remarks come in the backdrop of the US urging Taliban to ensure terrorist attacks are not launched from Afghan soil.

“I’ll first say that, of course, the Pakistani people have suffered greatly at the hands of violent extremists and terrorists. We have a shared interest with the Pakistani people and the Government of Pakistan in combating threats to regional security,” US State Department Spokesperson Matthew Miller had said in a presser last year.

“That has been a priority for us in engagements with them, and it continues to be.”

Comments

200 characters
Someone Jan 15, 2025 06:16pm
We have similar complements for you - we were indeed never allies. You just used us when you needed to!
thumb_up Recommended (7) reply Reply
Fatima Jan 15, 2025 07:01pm
How to register for this project
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Yaqoot Mir Jan 15, 2025 07:05pm
Go and Ally with India, Pakistan should clearly align with China, we dont need the US to counter terrorism we DO IT OURSELVES without an iota of support from the US. Fight terrorism on your own soil.
thumb_up Recommended (2) reply Reply
KU Jan 15, 2025 07:25pm
That there is the true picture of long-term ally of Pak, this should wake up our leading horde, but chances are it won't, they would much rather focus on aid /loans n celebrate it as economic success.
thumb_up Recommended (2) reply Reply
Re=== Jan 15, 2025 08:07pm
@Someone, This reeks of ingratitude. US used Pakistan for its adventurous disastrous war in Afghanistan and now this. Folks this is what happens when a country is politically and economically weak
thumb_up Recommended (2) reply Reply
Re=== Jan 15, 2025 10:13pm
You can call this America's fault or the failure of Pakistan's leadership and foreign policy. When a country is weak it gets beat up by everyone. Can Pakistan be strong and stand up to America?
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply