AIRLINK 183.51 Increased By ▲ 3.34 (1.85%)
BOP 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -1.14 (-9.98%)
CNERGY 8.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.29%)
CPHL 94.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.03 (-1.08%)
FCCL 46.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.43%)
FFL 16.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.92%)
FLYNG 28.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.87%)
HUBC 145.90 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (0.45%)
HUMNL 13.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.61%)
KEL 4.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.78%)
KOSM 5.76 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.59%)
MLCF 67.03 Decreased By ▼ -2.41 (-3.47%)
OGDC 213.35 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (0.53%)
PACE 6.08 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1%)
PAEL 47.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.17%)
PIAHCLA 17.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.22%)
PIBTL 9.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-5.86%)
POWER 14.30 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (5.61%)
PPL 170.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-0.3%)
PRL 33.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-2.22%)
PTC 22.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-2.39%)
SEARL 95.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-0.87%)
SSGC 41.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.47 (-3.39%)
SYM 15.61 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (10.01%)
TELE 7.49 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (3.03%)
TPLP 9.98 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.91%)
TRG 67.30 Increased By ▲ 1.70 (2.59%)
WAVESAPP 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.2%)
WTL 1.36 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.26%)
YOUW 3.84 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.67%)
AIRLINK 183.51 Increased By ▲ 3.34 (1.85%)
BOP 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -1.14 (-9.98%)
CNERGY 8.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.29%)
CPHL 94.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.03 (-1.08%)
FCCL 46.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.43%)
FFL 16.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.92%)
FLYNG 28.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.87%)
HUBC 145.90 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (0.45%)
HUMNL 13.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.61%)
KEL 4.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.78%)
KOSM 5.76 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.59%)
MLCF 67.03 Decreased By ▼ -2.41 (-3.47%)
OGDC 213.35 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (0.53%)
PACE 6.08 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1%)
PAEL 47.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.17%)
PIAHCLA 17.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.22%)
PIBTL 9.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-5.86%)
POWER 14.30 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (5.61%)
PPL 170.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-0.3%)
PRL 33.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-2.22%)
PTC 22.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-2.39%)
SEARL 95.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-0.87%)
SSGC 41.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.47 (-3.39%)
SYM 15.61 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (10.01%)
TELE 7.49 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (3.03%)
TPLP 9.98 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.91%)
TRG 67.30 Increased By ▲ 1.70 (2.59%)
WAVESAPP 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.2%)
WTL 1.36 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.26%)
YOUW 3.84 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.67%)
BR100 12,666 Decreased By -36.5 (-0.29%)
BR30 38,108 Decreased By -149.5 (-0.39%)
KSE100 118,430 Increased By 47 (0.04%)
KSE30 36,403 Increased By 8.1 (0.02%)

LAHORE: the Customs department has failed to establish use of an oil tanker in smuggling of diesel, as the relevant appellate forum has confirmed release of the vehicle while dismissing the reference, said sources.

According to details, the department had confiscated an oil tanker involved in smuggling of fuel, and nobody was in it when the department had taken it into custody. Allegation was that oil tanker was used for smuggling of High Spirit Diesel (HSD) without proper documentation. Department filed Reference application as the Customs Appellate Tribunal while setting aside Order-in-Original, ordered release of the vehicle-in-question against the payment of 20%.

The department took the plea that oil tanker was very much part and parcel of the illegality and violation made by the respondent. Official record revealed that when the oil tanker was taken into custody there was nobody in it, thereafter it was taken the concerned Customs House. When a show-cause notice was issued, in response the owner of the oil tanker appeared and submitted before the Customs authorities that he had nothing to do with the HSD and stated that his oil tanker was plying on hire basis.

Despite the fact that the subject-vehicle was found abandoned but it was also confirmed that it was registered with Motor Vehicle Authority. However, the appellate forum noted that the Authorities failed to acquire details and to issue show-cause notice to the owner. Though ownership documents were furnished, however, no effort was made by the authorities to verify the same from the Excise Department.

Also, prior to the incident, the department was not in possession of any material or evidence against the owner of the oil tanker to be involved in any objectionable activity.

It added that the authorities made no effort to create a link between the HSD and the oil tanker, which established that the confiscation of HSD and the oil tanker were two different aspects requiring different treatments.

Therefore, the relevant appellate forum maintained that confiscation of the oil tanker was unwarranted and could not be approved.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed.